How would that affect an F1 car ?
Is it illegal to used it in F1 ?
Heavier than lead.sgth0mas wrote:Do you need that much density there?
Yes it would be illegal. I can imagine F1 having used it as stationary ballast in the 60s-70's. In that period it was used in other fields (eg. aviation), but not later.FLuidd wrote:How would that affect an F1 car ?
Is it illegal to used it in F1 ?
DU INCASED IN TITANIUM , KEY WORK INCASED.Edax wrote:Yes it would be illegal. I can imagine F1 having used it as stationary ballast in the 60s-70's. In that period it was used in other fields (eg. aviation), but not later.FLuidd wrote:How would that affect an F1 car ?
Is it illegal to used it in F1 ?
I also do not see the benefit of using DU skid plates. You use a skid plate to prevent the plank from being worn down, you don't want the skid plate to wear down as fast. So you are looking for a specific set of properties, mainly hardness, toughness and friction for the wear behavior, and thermal conductivity, thermal capacity and melting point, to control the energy flows associated with rubbing on the road. Weight is a bonus.
When I heard the remark that they were using toxic heavy metals, the first thing which sprang to mind was thoriated tungsten.
Most common heavy metal is tungsten, but it is very brittle and would likely crumble in contact with the road,
Thoriated tungsten has been used for a long period of time for many applications ranging from light bulbs to welding electrodes and was abundantly available. Only a few years ago it became banned (in Europe) under the nuclear act. It has the properties of tungsten but not its brittleness, which could make it an interesting candidate.
by the color of its sparks..FLuidd wrote:Heavier than lead.sgth0mas wrote:Do you need that much density there?
I have heard that DU ballast has been used in F1 before , but i am asking how would that influence if it were to be incased in the titanium skid plates.
How would FIA figure out that is not just titanium.
do they do full x.ray scans on the car?
Im very aware of the density of DU...my question is whether they need that much density at all...especially in the skid plate.FLuidd wrote:Heavier than lead.sgth0mas wrote:Do you need that much density there?
I have heard that DU ballast has been used in F1 before , but i am asking how would that influence if it were to be incased in the titanium skid plates.
How would FIA figure out that is not just titanium.
do they do full x.ray scans on the car?
Well, I can understand why: it's very, very low down the car, the lowest part of the car, and quite central too. This is a benefit when looking at ballast to add weight up to your minimum weight (around 700kg I presume nowadays). Having as much mass as possible down there, will increase your CoG. The denser your material is, the quicker you can get to your minimum weight before looking at less favourable places to add up ballast.sgth0mas wrote:Im very aware of the density of DU...my question is whether they need that much density at all...especially in the skid plate.FLuidd wrote:Heavier than lead.sgth0mas wrote:Do you need that much density there?
I have heard that DU ballast has been used in F1 before , but i am asking how would that influence if it were to be incased in the titanium skid plates.
How would FIA figure out that is not just titanium.
do they do full x.ray scans on the car?
Its like asking if they could gold plate the steering wheel. Even if they are allowed to...why would they?
exactly. a thin layer of titanium on the surface to make contact with the ground , then on the inside a du plate.turbof1 wrote:Well, I can understand why: it's very, very low down the car, the lowest part of the car, and quite central too. This is a benefit when looking at ballast to add weight up to your minimum weight (around 700kg I presume nowadays). Having as much mass as possible down there, will increase your CoG. The denser your material is, the quicker you can get to your minimum weight before looking at less favourable places to add up ballast.sgth0mas wrote:Im very aware of the density of DU...my question is whether they need that much density at all...especially in the skid plate.FLuidd wrote:
Heavier than lead.
I have heard that DU ballast has been used in F1 before , but i am asking how would that influence if it were to be incased in the titanium skid plates.
How would FIA figure out that is not just titanium.
do they do full x.ray scans on the car?
Its like asking if they could gold plate the steering wheel. Even if they are allowed to...why would they?
Good answer! Thanks!turbof1 wrote:Well, I can understand why: it's very, very low down the car, the lowest part of the car, and quite central too. This is a benefit when looking at ballast to add weight up to your minimum weight (around 700kg I presume nowadays). Having as much mass as possible down there, will increase your CoG. The denser your material is, the quicker you can get to your minimum weight before looking at less favourable places to add up ballast.sgth0mas wrote:Im very aware of the density of DU...my question is whether they need that much density at all...especially in the skid plate.FLuidd wrote:
Heavier than lead.
I have heard that DU ballast has been used in F1 before , but i am asking how would that influence if it were to be incased in the titanium skid plates.
How would FIA figure out that is not just titanium.
do they do full x.ray scans on the car?
Its like asking if they could gold plate the steering wheel. Even if they are allowed to...why would they?
I read it as "increases a teams control of the location of CG".turbof1 wrote:Quick correction: when I said "increase the CoG", I meant it as it benefits it and lowers it. My apologies if that come across as the opposite!
Ok misread that part. Mea culpa.FLuidd wrote:DU INCASED IN TITANIUM , KEY WORK INCASED.Edax wrote:Yes it would be illegal. I can imagine F1 having used it as stationary ballast in the 60s-70's. In that period it was used in other fields (eg. aviation), but not later.FLuidd wrote:How would that affect an F1 car ?
Is it illegal to used it in F1 ?
I also do not see the benefit of using DU skid plates. You use a skid plate to prevent the plank from being worn down, you don't want the skid plate to wear down as fast. So you are looking for a specific set of properties, mainly hardness, toughness and friction for the wear behavior, and thermal conductivity, thermal capacity and melting point, to control the energy flows associated with rubbing on the road. Weight is a bonus.
When I heard the remark that they were using toxic heavy metals, the first thing which sprang to mind was thoriated tungsten.
Most common heavy metal is tungsten, but it is very brittle and would likely crumble in contact with the road,
Thoriated tungsten has been used for a long period of time for many applications ranging from light bulbs to welding electrodes and was abundantly available. Only a few years ago it became banned (in Europe) under the nuclear act. It has the properties of tungsten but not its brittleness, which could make it an interesting candidate.