Sasha wrote:Late last year a member of HRD asked his uncle(was on Gato engine team in 80's) to take a look at the Honda PU and write a review on it.After the Senior Engineers and Arias read his report,they asked him to come back to work on the PU.There are three other consultants on his team. Mclaren had nothing to do with this,europress just talking from their ass.
Because the 2016 PU was already design by the time they got there and the very little time before the season started,their ideas are not in todays PU.
And the token system is killing them this year.14 tokens is not enough for what is needed to be done.(secondary injection,bigger compressor and better ERS cooling)
The only thing Honda did wrong with the PU was taking the wrong path of size zero.(it cost them a year because of overheating problems.....still have some problems today and put a cap on performance with the compressor in the V)
I'm never sure why people make statements like this, I'm fairly sure the same exact type of statements were made last year. At the time Honda had said that they knew what was wrong and how to fix it and people made the same claims as you. Absolutes, the only thing they did wrong was X because they know how to fix it and thus it will definitely work.
Except they thought that throughout 2014 and ended up with the 2015 engine. Then in 2015 they 'knew' how to fix it and apparently their design was fine but then we have the under powered 2016 engine. But again because someone supposedly says they know how to fix it, it's an absolute truth that the engine and fundamental design is fine and these ideas will certainly make it a good engine?
It was silly when people made such claims last year and just as silly now. The new guy may have great ideas and they might work, they could also be good ideas which they fail to implement correctly or they could be ideas that seem good but don't pan out at all. I said in response to the claims the engine was fixed last year that the engine will be good and fixed when it actually is fast and reliable, until then it's an idea and not at all proven.