Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Breaking news, useful data or technical highlights or vehicles that are not meant to race. You can post commercial vehicle news or developments here.
Please post topics on racing variants in "other racing categories".
No Lotus
No Lotus
3
Joined: 26 Jan 2013, 17:22
Location: Reno, NV, USA

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

Jolle wrote:Beautiful technical design! Hard to believe with so much air under the bodywork it will fit two fat rich people, a V12 and the cooling system for 1k HP.

Compared to this, a P1 is a versatile city car....
Yeah, I don't get the packaging. This is the lowest car ever, and yet instead of being densely packed with all the necessary components, it's pretty hollow down below. What does not make sense is how high the cg looks to be. The engine and transmission are well off the deck.
SCUDERIA FASE
2016 Phase 1

User avatar
SR71
5
Joined: 27 Jan 2016, 21:23

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

No Lotus wrote:
Jolle wrote:Beautiful technical design! Hard to believe with so much air under the bodywork it will fit two fat rich people, a V12 and the cooling system for 1k HP.

Compared to this, a P1 is a versatile city car....
Yeah, I don't get the packaging. This is the lowest car ever, and yet instead of being densely packed with all the necessary components, it's pretty hollow down below. What does not make sense is how high the cg looks to be. The engine and transmission are well off the deck.
Because it's a ground effect car?

No Lotus
No Lotus
3
Joined: 26 Jan 2013, 17:22
Location: Reno, NV, USA

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

SR71 wrote:
No Lotus wrote:
Jolle wrote:Beautiful technical design! Hard to believe with so much air under the bodywork it will fit two fat rich people, a V12 and the cooling system for 1k HP.

Compared to this, a P1 is a versatile city car....
Yeah, I don't get the packaging. This is the lowest car ever, and yet instead of being densely packed with all the necessary components, it's pretty hollow down below. What does not make sense is how high the cg looks to be. The engine and transmission are well off the deck.
Because it's a ground effect car?
The engine and transmission should be as low as possible and ground effect supplied by aero tunnels to the sides of the drivetrain. This car is so high off the ground it looks ready for some serious off-roading.

I don't think it's going to have a sophisticated active suspension given their weight targets, apparent lack of space for anything on that car, and repeated statements that it will be incredibly simple.

Someone who was at the reveal in Monaco described a sawtoothed rear wing below the body which obviously doesn't feature in the car shown today.
SCUDERIA FASE
2016 Phase 1

User avatar
SR71
5
Joined: 27 Jan 2016, 21:23

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

No Lotus wrote:
SR71 wrote:
No Lotus wrote: Yeah, I don't get the packaging. This is the lowest car ever, and yet instead of being densely packed with all the necessary components, it's pretty hollow down below. What does not make sense is how high the cg looks to be. The engine and transmission are well off the deck.
Because it's a ground effect car?
The engine and transmission should be as low as possible and ground effect supplied by aero tunnels to the sides of the drivetrain. This car is so high off the ground it looks ready for some serious off-roading.

I don't think it's going to have a sophisticated active suspension given their weight targets, apparent lack of space for anything on that car, and repeated statements that it will be incredibly simple.

Someone who was at the reveal in Monaco described a sawtoothed rear wing below the body which obviously doesn't feature in the car shown today.
I think Adrian Newey disagrees.... Yes this is a concept preview and I'm sure we're not getting the whole story but I'm sure the engine and transmission are plenty low and I highly doubt the car is pictured at track spec ride height.

You did nicely sum it up with this quote though: "Yeah, I don't get the packaging. "

User avatar
VARIANT | one
5
Joined: 30 Mar 2016, 00:56
Location: St. Petersburg, FL, USA

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

No Lotus wrote:
I don't think it's going to have a sophisticated active suspension given their weight targets, apparent lack of space for anything on that car, and repeated statements that it will be incredibly simple.
Why would an active suspension be heavier? Granted, you add some weight from the hydraulics and valving systems, but in the case of a racecar (and let's face it, this is a racecar), you eliminate the springs, the third spring, the anti roll mechanism, and all the respective linkages to make that stuff work. You can even ditch the bell cranks if the package is right like with the Williams Active.

Image

No Lotus
No Lotus
3
Joined: 26 Jan 2013, 17:22
Location: Reno, NV, USA

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

SR71 wrote:
No Lotus wrote:
SR71 wrote:
Because it's a ground effect car?
The engine and transmission should be as low as possible and ground effect supplied by aero tunnels to the sides of the drivetrain. This car is so high off the ground it looks ready for some serious off-roading.

I don't think it's going to have a sophisticated active suspension given their weight targets, apparent lack of space for anything on that car, and repeated statements that it will be incredibly simple.

Someone who was at the reveal in Monaco described a sawtoothed rear wing below the body which obviously doesn't feature in the car shown today.
I think Adrian Newey disagrees.... Yes this is a concept preview and I'm sure we're not getting the whole story but I'm sure the engine and transmission are plenty low and I highly doubt the car is pictured at track spec ride height.
If you had eyes you'd see that they're not plenty low.
SCUDERIA FASE
2016 Phase 1

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

SR71 wrote:
Just_a_fan wrote:
SR71 wrote:

I think it's safe to say this isn't the most beautiful Aston ever so it's also safe to say that most of what we see is performance driven.

Functional Beauty is what we are seeing here... I'd say less than 10% styling details are aesthetic driven, mostly the details that keep it in the AM design language family.
The most beautiful Aston Martin ever, the DBR1, was a pure racing car...it was all performance driven.
and if they had the science knowledge we have now it wouldnt look anything like it did... it would look like the AM/RB-001.
.
No it wouldn't, it would have looked like a current Le Mans LMP1. And it still wouldn't be as beautiful as the DBR1.

I'd be amazed if it will match LMP1 levels of downforce even though it is unfettered by their rules. The fact that it will have much more power is going to be a big help to their lap time aims.

There's a lot of aero bits missing on the press release photos, that much is clear. I bet it won't be so open at the back end when it hits the road.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

User avatar
gandharva
252
Joined: 06 Feb 2012, 15:19
Location: Munich

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

SR71 wrote:My guess, like others have said, is that this program is roughtly 1-1.5 years old. We had a hint at the program when the AM/RB rumors started last year in Monza I believe.
The program with AM is running for 18 month now, according to Horner.

User avatar
RegerandeBull
3
Joined: 03 Dec 2015, 12:52

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

Amateur analysis of the aerodynamics of the AM-RB 001

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XX0G0OpTAdI

What an absolutely bizarre and ridiculous car, I love it. At first I kind of thought it was ugly but it's really growing on me. I hope the headlights on the production version look a lot different than they do now. Also I can't wait to see the track special version.

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

RegerandeBull wrote:Amateur analysis of the aerodynamics of the AM-RB 001

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XX0G0OpTAdI

What an absolutely bizarre and ridiculous car, I love it. At first I kind of thought it was ugly but it's really growing on me. I hope the headlights on the production version look a lot different than they do now. Also I can't wait to see the track special version.
The headlights on the concept are just grey paint atm.
"In downforce we trust"

User avatar
RegerandeBull
3
Joined: 03 Dec 2015, 12:52

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

djos wrote:
RegerandeBull wrote:Amateur analysis of the aerodynamics of the AM-RB 001

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XX0G0OpTAdI

What an absolutely bizarre and ridiculous car, I love it. At first I kind of thought it was ugly but it's really growing on me. I hope the headlights on the production version look a lot different than they do now. Also I can't wait to see the track special version.
The headlights on the concept are just grey paint atm.
Yeah I could tell I hope the with real headlights will make the car look much more 'Aston Martin' than it does now. It's kind of strange without them atm.

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

RegerandeBull wrote: Yeah I could tell I hope the with real headlights will make the car look much more 'Aston Martin' than it does now. It's kind of strange without them atm.
True, some nice laser headlights would be cool!
"In downforce we trust"

User avatar
RegerandeBull
3
Joined: 03 Dec 2015, 12:52

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

djos wrote:
RegerandeBull wrote: Yeah I could tell I hope the with real headlights will make the car look much more 'Aston Martin' than it does now. It's kind of strange without them atm.
True, some nice laser headlights would be cool!
Maybe we'll get some special LMP1 spec headlights but I bet they'll probably end up looking like this

Image
Last edited by RegerandeBull on 06 Jul 2016, 12:56, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

RegerandeBull wrote:
djos wrote:
RegerandeBull wrote: Yeah I could tell I hope the with real headlights will make the car look much more 'Aston Martin' than it does now. It's kind of strange without them atm.
True, some nice laser headlights would be cool!
Maybe we'll get some special LMP1 spec headlights but I bet it'll probably end up looking like this

https://cdn0.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/zOXvZj ... T_42.0.jpg
I think that's a pretty safe bet. 8)
"In downforce we trust"

User avatar
FoxHound
55
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 16:50

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

SR71 wrote: Never said it was a running car. But like I said, anyone with product development knowledge will know that AM/RB didnt arrive at the mock-up shown in the photos by just throwing some lines down on the drawing board. The surfaces you see probably represent 90% final surfaces and this is the result of EXTENSIVE simulation and wind-tunnel testing. NOT something you can mock up in 2 months. Obvious again, I know...
Absolute rubbish I'm afraid. You yourself quoted Horner in April:
SR71 wrote:They also blatantly ignore this:
"Although Aston Martin has not finalised the engine specification for the car yet, it has confirmed that its performance will be helped by extreme ground effect aerodynamics.

They didn't even know what engine it was going to have back then! :lol: Edit, they still actually don't and are currently "working" on it with "partners".

SR71 wrote:Prototype at Goodwood in June!

Foxhound, any response?

Or do you agree you misjudged this project and the actual timeline massively?

What else could you be wrong about?

The projects only a few weeks old :-) so probably not much right ;-)
Yup, Goodwood happened right?! :lol:

Also as far as the project goes, Aston Martin met up with Red Bull a year ago in Silverstone. So it is very likely that a project was agreed a year ago. And yes I'm fully aware how PR releases work.
It still does not detract from the fact that in this time, all we have seen is a shell of a car. Something that any design studio worth their salt could do, especially with a £99m budget.
When the project started in September 2012, it was evident that this new concept had to be ready by early March for the Geneva Motor Show, which is traditionally the most important event for European car design studios.
http://www.carbodydesign.com/2013/06/pi ... n-process/


For what it's worth, I'm impressed by the shell. That car looks tiny, and light, which it will need to be to have any chance of getting close to it's makers objectives of being faster than an F1 car around silverstone.
Last edited by FoxHound on 06 Jul 2016, 17:02, edited 2 times in total.
JET set