Out of curiosity I decided to check. Their websites (F1 & Elec) list the same address in Woking.Chubbs wrote:correct... however your liver, your brain and your heart are all in the same body... Mclaren Technologies and Mclaren F1 are not!! totally differrent!!Belatti wrote:The liver and the heart are separate parts of your body, but it is your brain that makes them work.Chubbs wrote:Mclaren technologies is a completely different company to Mclaren Formula One and is a seperate body... so really Mclaren have the same advantage as any other team...
http://www.mclaren.com/contact/contact.php<-- F1
http://www.mclarenelectronics.com/Contact%20Us/ <-- Elec
Am I missing something?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your logic seems sound and is valid for the long term. But surely You must agree that there are short term disadvantages to teams that are completely new to Mclaren electronics and partnered suppliers (i.e. ECU ancillary suppliers). Quantifying these disadvantages is near to impossible (unless of course u had access to Alonso's highly accurate 'performance gain calculator'...) as the more significant effects are indirectly related to performance.Spencifer_Murphy wrote:TBH I don't see much of an advantage for Mclaren at all, seeing as their technology is going to be used by everyone.
I mean that's why Ferrari got all upset about the spygate scandal, the idea that Mclaren would be using their technology thus diminishing their own advantage.
What I mean is that by having standard ECU's nobody has an advantage do they, that's the whole point in them. Who makes it is irrelevent seeing as everybody will have them.
To claim a disadvantage also requires evidence that Mclaren has access to information/ convenience that the other teams don't have available to them (put simply: they have an advantage). I would propose that having the same operational base and having worked with the ECU designers beforehand has its inherent conveniences but that all teams would have all the information needed to properly run the ECU and its ancilliaries.
One could, however, argue that time zones and language/communication 'barriers' could contribute to Mclaren having an advantage in the information department (these are international companies and the words "$@#%* pos Microsoft!!!" may translate differently).
After all is said and done, I doubt Mclaren gained another magical 0.6s

"Then no advantage!" You say? Having better rested employees and saving a couple dozen grand surely can't be hurting them...
Last but not least, I wonder what will happen to Mclaren F1's budget when The Mclaren Group shows a larger profit partly due to Mclaren Electronics' newfound income?...

Regards,
Kurt