I mostly agree, however there are 2 physical conditions for drivers beside their skill:Henk wrote:Just to add. If you look at the top Tour de France cyclists there are different body types. If you look at Armstrong, Evans, Contador, Quintana, Porte or Froome you will see a big difference in the shape and size of their legs and upper bodies. In cycling the internals of the body, like oxygen intake of the blood and lung capacity, are more important than the perfect shape.
That's why this comparison is not realistic. The most important thing for a racing driver is his or her skill not his or her stamina or strength. That's why the average driver probably don't have much more physical talent than the average person. So they have no specific body type or extra talent to build muscle, lose weight or take in huge amounts of oxygen.
This means that some drivers are prone to build very big and bulky muscles and others have more lean muscles. Some have to work really hard to reach the level of fitness that's required and other are well over it and do triathlons for fun. Maybe we will see some drivers struggle to be fit enough to handle a race or rest their heads like Massa always did through turn 8, but I think all drivers will be able to sustain the forces and race.
And then if you look at track cyclists you'll see they're built like brick shithouses (Robert Förstmann, Chris Hoy etc).Henk wrote:Just to add. If you look at the top Tour de France cyclists there are different body types. If you look at Armstrong, Evans, Contador, Quintana, Porte or Froome you will see a big difference in the shape and size of their legs and upper bodies. In cycling the internals of the body, like oxygen intake of the blood and lung capacity, are more important than the perfect shape.
I didn't want to put too much caveats in the argument. I agree and there is a certain amount of natural selection going on in the lower series that is caused by physical talent. I just wanted to make the case that appearance is not a good way to judge F1 drivers fitness, while in other sports it might make more sense.turbof1 wrote: I mostly agree, however there are 2 physical conditions for drivers beside their skill:
-A certain minimum amount of stamina and stength to cope with the G forces unhindered. Since it only requirer a certain level and not the highest level attainable, you are not seeing extreme things in this regard.
-A very low body weight since the team wants to be as much as possibly able to fill the car up with ballast up to the minimum weight.
I also wanted to mention Tom Dumoulin who is a time trial cyclists with quite a large upper body. He beat Froome in a heavy mountain stage in the Vuelta last year with an awesome rope a dope.Cold Fussion wrote: And then if you look at track cyclists you'll see they're built like brick shithouses (Robert Förstmann, Chris Hoy etc).
I don't agree with that at all, these guys are training day in, day out to keep their stamina up, no matter which way you cut it, 4-5G's for 2 hours in a hot car whilst concentrating is a hard task. It may not be as physical or as hard as it used to be, but the drivers stay on top of their training to make sure they're as good at the end of that 2 hours as they are at the start. They're probably fitter than 99.9% of the population.Henk wrote: That's why the average driver probably don't have much more physical talent than the average person. So they have no specific body type or extra talent to build muscle, lose weight or take in huge amounts of oxygen.
Yes. Anything that hampers getting to a comfortable level of resilliance towards the applied G forces will make you feel dizzy. That can be anything: illness, a recent concussion, or yes failing to reach the required fitness (but again, that's not necessary muscle volume).Andres125sx wrote:Interesting replies, specially those from Turbo and Henk (both upvoted), thanks
So in the supposed scenario of a driver feeling dizzy you think it may be more because of reseistance than strenght
No, I'm sorry, I can't accept that. All professional athletes are far, far, FAR fitter than the average person. Aside from the very definition of average making that an inevitable truth. As with all modern sports, their fitness training is so specific that they have a body shape tailored to the requirements of the sport. But I would be very surprised if every single driver on the grid wasn't capable of running a marathon with their current level of fitness.Henk wrote:That's why the average driver probably don't have much more physical talent than the average person. So they have no specific body type or extra talent to build muscle, lose weight or take in huge amounts of oxygen.
Note he used the word 'talent'. The best athletes have a very high natural aptitude for what they are doing. F1 drivers on average don't have any more physical potential then your average person. They are just trained more. They can run for instance triathlons, but they will always be beaten by people with a more efficient body. That's just how it is, with which genes you are born.adrianjordan wrote:No, I'm sorry, I can't accept that. All professional athletes are far, far, FAR fitter than the average person. Aside from the very definition of average making that an inevitable truth. As with all modern sports, their fitness training is so specific that they have a body shape tailored to the requirements of the sport. But I would be very surprised if every single driver on the grid wasn't capable of running a marathon with their current level of fitness.Henk wrote:That's why the average driver probably don't have much more physical talent than the average person. So they have no specific body type or extra talent to build muscle, lose weight or take in huge amounts of oxygen.
As for why new drivers aren't surprised by the physical demands any more. The advent of driver training programmes etc means that they are already preparing long before they actually make it to the sport....so when they arrive they are already at the required level of fitness.
In the case you were commenting on my previous post: with physical potential I did not include cognitive functions like reaction time.godlameroso wrote:He(Button) had a significantly faster reaction time than the professional athletes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuiksOOby6s
You underestimate the power of the Dark Side (doping). The most "genetically gifted" athlete (or talented as you said) will be beaten by the average person on the right stack of "supplements" (EPO, testosterone, HGH, insulin,cortisone).turbof1 wrote: The video showed perfectly what I meant: despite Button being a very fit and trained triathlete, his body does not get rid of the lactate as well as one of the Brownlees, meaning he went into anearobic state a lot more and a lot faster. That's a gap he'll never be able to close no matter what. The natural aptitude of the Brownlees for endurance is what you can call "talent".