2014-2020 Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
Brian Coat
Brian Coat
99
Joined: 16 Jun 2012, 18:42

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

In general, FW17s idea of reducing heat 'leakage' to the walls is sensible though, isn't it?

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Yes it is, whether you'd use gold exclusively is debatable though. maybe strategically at the quench area of the cylinder head maybe it's a good idea?
Saishū kōnā

User avatar
FW17
169
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Image

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Is that actually gold tho?

I was under the impression that gold had a comparatively low melting point compared to other metals and would therefore be unsuitable for use in a combustion chamber.
"In downforce we trust"

3jawchuck
3jawchuck
37
Joined: 03 Feb 2015, 08:57

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

That's gold but not gold gold, probably titanium nitride or something like that.

User avatar
FW17
169
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

I don't want to say gold is to be used but the idea of reflecting the heat back away from the surfaces so that it is not lost in the block and block cooling. Like we have seen during blown diffuser days teams were using some exotic materials to make ducts on the bodywork, can such pyrosic material be be used?
Is it safe to insulate the walls?
Will this mean more turbine power?
Will engine structure remain stable?
Can combustion be controlled with higher combustion chamber temperatures?

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

djos wrote:
Is that actually gold tho?

I was under the impression that gold had a comparatively low melting point compared to other metals and would therefore be unsuitable for use in a combustion chamber.
1063deg C which is better than most (all?) aluminium alloys.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Just_a_fan wrote:
djos wrote:
Is that actually gold tho?

I was under the impression that gold had a comparatively low melting point compared to other metals and would therefore be unsuitable for use in a combustion chamber.
1063deg C which is better than most (all?) aluminium alloys.
Well steel is 1400+ plus Iirc.
"In downforce we trust"

Jolle
Jolle
133
Joined: 29 Jan 2014, 22:58
Location: Dordrecht

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Just a thought, I guess it would be possible to scrap all the whole flywheel (as small as its has been in a racing engine) and have the K unit support the ICE at low revs.

Brian Coat
Brian Coat
99
Joined: 16 Jun 2012, 18:42

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Perhaps the ideal coating would be highly reflective, non-conductive and strong (ie knock tolerant).

Is the nearest real world coating to this 'ideal' likely to be metallic or ceramic?

Jolle
Jolle
133
Joined: 29 Jan 2014, 22:58
Location: Dordrecht

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Remembering that Ferrari didn't wrap their exhausts in the beginning to retain heat, this way of thinking (retaining as much energy as possible) must be one of their biggest flaws and catch-ups during the past 1 ½ seasons.

PhillipM
PhillipM
386
Joined: 16 May 2011, 15:18
Location: Over the road from Boothy...

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

3jawchuck wrote: That's gold but not gold gold, probably titanium nitride or something like that.
This, looks much more like TiN to me. That's not gold.

Brian Coat
Brian Coat
99
Joined: 16 Jun 2012, 18:42

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

So folks, which piston crown coating would be best, overall?

Titanium Nitride?
Yttrium Stabilised Zirconia?
Other?

It's an interesting question.
Last edited by Brian Coat on 19 Aug 2016, 23:11, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

It gets even more interesting when you consider that maybe it's not which coating works best, but which combination of coatings works best. Maybe the coating you use for the cylinder walls doesn't work so well as a piston crown coating, or the quench area where the combustion chamber joins the head. Maybe the intake valves need a different coating than the exhaust valves. Or maybe you use a different coating on the piston skirts, or wrist pins, then there's the CC roof as well. Maybe different coatings can strategically retain heat while others improve lubrication, while others dissipate heat, while others give better acoustic properties.

That's another thing, no one really talks about it because it such a basic part that should be sorted but the harmonics of an engine can certainly affect friction, and by consequence efficiency.
Saishū kōnā

PhillipM
PhillipM
386
Joined: 16 May 2011, 15:18
Location: Over the road from Boothy...

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

I think that's probably just a fairly thick layer of TiN because it has great IR reflectivity and good thermal insulation too, whether that's over a basecoat for better flexibility given the thermal expansion of the piston vs the coating is another matter. Skirts appear to have either titanium disulphide or a mix of that and molybdenum disulphide - looks a bit too light for just a usual moly-based coating, although could be the photo.