Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Breaking news, useful data or technical highlights or vehicles that are not meant to race. You can post commercial vehicle news or developments here.
Please post topics on racing variants in "other racing categories".
User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

bill shoe wrote:Seems like a pretty good approach. Only drawback is that batteries may have overtaken SuperCapacitors for energy density and even power density. Could ideally use the MGU mass as part of the flywheel mass?

All current (pun, ha-ha) hybrid systems are there for some kind of rule compliance, whether it's an emissions legality thing, or an F1 technical regulation thing. It's interesting to ponder the role of hybrid in an uncompromised unregulated performance car.
True, capacitors do have much faster charge/discharge rates which could be useful in this scenario however Lithium-NMC might have better energy density and thus capacity and possibly even more flexible packaging options too.
"In downforce we trust"

Jolle
Jolle
133
Joined: 29 Jan 2014, 22:58
Location: Dordrecht

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

bill shoe wrote:
Jolle wrote:Around 20kg together, 200Hp? 10 HP/kg, including storage.
You will want these addresses-

http://www.mclaren.com/careers/

http://auto.ferrari.com/en_EN/ongoing-h ... y/careers/

I've started your Letter of Interest for you--
Sir:

I am interested in working with your company. I've recently determined that electric hybrid systems of around 10 HP/kg are quite feasible with current technology, but you continue to persist with supercar hybrid systems that are 5 times as heavy, and with F1 systems that are still 2 times as heavy. I know something that everyone else in your company does not. Specifically...
We're talking about a road car that must outperform a F1 car. There is a lot of skunkworks tech needed to make this thing work. A next (big) step in hybrid tech is one of them. Let loose everything that had been done before.
The McLaren Formula E motor is 26kg and now several years old. Could be at least 30% lighter and more powerful. Same goes for a small "quick boost" ES pack. This car is about pushing boundaries.

User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

djos wrote:True, capacitors do have much faster charge/discharge rates which could be useful in this scenario however Lithium-NMC might have better energy density and thus capacity and possibly even more flexible packaging options too.
I use lithium batteries with 65C discharge rate, wich means they can be fully discharged in 60 seconds or even less. And I´m talking about hobby batteries made for radiocontrolled planes/helis/drones.

I don´t think anyone need more discharging rate than this sincerely, and about charging, people is charging this at up to 10C wich means fully charged in 6 minutes. Probably this is still a limit for hybrid systems tough, as you can harvest some serious energy so even if it´s only for some seconds, the charging rate might be too high

User avatar
rscsr
51
Joined: 19 Feb 2012, 13:02
Location: Austria

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

Andres125sx wrote:
djos wrote:True, capacitors do have much faster charge/discharge rates which could be useful in this scenario however Lithium-NMC might have better energy density and thus capacity and possibly even more flexible packaging options too.
I use lithium batteries with 65C discharge rate, wich means they can be fully discharged in 60 seconds or even less. And I´m talking about hobby batteries made for radiocontrolled planes/helis/drones.

I don´t think anyone need more discharging rate than this sincerely, and about charging, people is charging this at up to 10C wich means fully charged in 6 minutes. Probably this is still a limit for hybrid systems tough, as you can harvest some serious energy so even if it´s only for some seconds, the charging rate might be too high
May I ask what batteries you use? These rates sound awesome, but how many cycles do they withstand at these rates (with adequat cooling of course)?

Cold Fussion
Cold Fussion
93
Joined: 19 Dec 2010, 04:51

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

bill shoe wrote:
Jolle wrote:The advantages of hybrid technology for hyper performance cars is so obvious that it would be very low tech if a project wouldn't have a hybrid PU system.
I figure we can take a 2012-era 2.4L V-8 with rev-limit and minimum-weight as a useful metric for IC engine performance. This is 750 hp and 100 kg, so 7.5 hp/kg.

Current F1 hybrid stuff is ~ 45 kg for the whole MGU-K/control electronics/battery package, yes? It puts out 200 hp? So then 4.4 hp/kg.

It appears that any hybrid car will need both a multi-gear transmission and a fuel (petrol) tank in order to use any combo of IC and/or electric. For example, all electric power in a hybrid is originally sourced from the petrol unless you’re doing very short trips or add lots of battery weight. In other words it doesn’t make sense to attribute transmission or petrol weights exclusively to one motive type or the other (IC or electric).

If you were Mr. Newey would you achieve your oodles-of-power target by adding more IC at 7.5 hp/kg, or by adding hybridization at 4.4 hp/kg?

So high performance track cars are lighter with IC-only rather than hybrid. Street cars with catalysts and mufflers would be a closer contest. However, the street-legal aspect of Newey’s hyper-car may be fading. They may end up going for more of a “street-type” car that is not actually production-car road-legal in most developed countries.

I can see a mild hybrid unit that replaces the weight of starter, alternator, and reverse gear with a small unit that adds a useful 100 hp for temporary bursts. This type of system justifies its tubby weight by replacing some of the admittedly tubby IC accessories.
The problem with this is the assumption is engine is more than likely not going to be a small displacement super high revving engine. This car needs around 900-1000hp to meet their performance targets, looking at current high performance road NA engines, the highest specific power is around 150hp/L, which necessitate a 6+L engine. They'll probably have to push this to at least 200hp/L in order for their goals to be reached. How light can they make a 5L V10/V12? I would also suspect that any hybridisation would be much closer to that of the 2009 era cars (1/10th the battery pack size, no MGU-H etc), so the power density can be quite a bit higher than the current F1 cars.

User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

rscsr wrote:
Andres125sx wrote:
djos wrote:True, capacitors do have much faster charge/discharge rates which could be useful in this scenario however Lithium-NMC might have better energy density and thus capacity and possibly even more flexible packaging options too.
I use lithium batteries with 65C discharge rate, wich means they can be fully discharged in 60 seconds or even less. And I´m talking about hobby batteries made for radiocontrolled planes/helis/drones.

I don´t think anyone need more discharging rate than this sincerely, and about charging, people is charging this at up to 10C wich means fully charged in 6 minutes. Probably this is still a limit for hybrid systems tough, as you can harvest some serious energy so even if it´s only for some seconds, the charging rate might be too high
May I ask what batteries you use? These rates sound awesome, but how many cycles do they withstand at these rates (with adequat cooling of course)?
Turnigy Graphene

There´s a thread on RcGroups where people and specially rampman (the OP) is doing some serious tests (continuous charging and discharging at 30 and 10Cs), and they´re holding up around three times the cycles of normal lithium batteries (900-1000 vs 300), wich is the real advantage of this graphene batteries, as there´s some others with same discharging rate (Tatto claims 75C for theirs) but they don´t last that much.

But at 65C I don´t think they´ll last a tenth of that obviously. I discharge them in around 3 minutes (a bit more or less depending on the flying) so around 20C average, and they get warm, but not hot at all.

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

Andres that's seriously impressive stuff, I imagine that's what would be used in F1 and WEC?
"In downforce we trust"

User avatar
DiogoBrand
73
Joined: 14 May 2015, 19:02
Location: Brazil

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

Just out of curiosity: What would be the downsides of using a CVT?
The main one I can think of is that they'd probably have to develop it from scratch, since I don't think there are any CVT's made for that kind of power. But apart from that, considering weight, volume and every other factor, would it be viable?

User avatar
FW17
169
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

There is probably more power loss with a CVT in comparison to a conventional

graham.reeds
graham.reeds
16
Joined: 30 Jul 2015, 09:16

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

DiogoBrand wrote:Just out of curiosity: What would be the downsides of using a CVT?
The main one I can think of is that they'd probably have to develop it from scratch, since I don't think there are any CVT's made for that kind of power. But apart from that, considering weight, volume and every other factor, would it be viable?
Purchase the IP from Williams if they want a strong lightweight CVT.

Transmission loss is more than a conventional transmission, but not massively.

User avatar
SR71
5
Joined: 27 Jan 2016, 21:23

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

graham.reeds wrote:
DiogoBrand wrote:Just out of curiosity: What would be the downsides of using a CVT?
The main one I can think of is that they'd probably have to develop it from scratch, since I don't think there are any CVT's made for that kind of power. But apart from that, considering weight, volume and every other factor, would it be viable?
Purchase the IP from Williams if they want a strong lightweight CVT.




Transmission loss is more than a conventional transmission, but not massively.

Direct drive seems more feasible...

Pat Pending
Pat Pending
3
Joined: 22 Feb 2016, 13:11

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

SR71 wrote:
graham.reeds wrote:
DiogoBrand wrote:Just out of curiosity: What would be the downsides of using a CVT?
The main one I can think of is that they'd probably have to develop it from scratch, since I don't think there are any CVT's made for that kind of power. But apart from that, considering weight, volume and every other factor, would it be viable?
Purchase the IP from Williams if they want a strong lightweight CVT.


Transmission loss is more than a conventional transmission, but not massively.

Direct drive seems more feasible...
Have a Google of the Koenigsegg(sic) Regera. Turbo IC plus 3 electric motors with single gear direct drive, albeit with a torque converter to allow engine/transmission slip at low speeds.

User avatar
SR71
5
Joined: 27 Jan 2016, 21:23

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

Pat Pending wrote:
SR71 wrote:
graham.reeds wrote: Purchase the IP from Williams if they want a strong lightweight CVT.


Transmission loss is more than a conventional transmission, but not massively.

Direct drive seems more feasible...
Have a Google of the Koenigsegg(sic) Regera. Turbo IC plus 3 electric motors with single gear direct drive, albeit with a torque converter to allow engine/transmission slip at low speeds.
Thats what I meant :-)

User avatar
AratzH
9
Joined: 07 May 2013, 09:24
Location: Michigan

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

Is this an ECO version of AM's hypercar or was it a source of inspiration for Newey? :lol:

Image

Image
MVRC -> TF

Jolle
Jolle
133
Joined: 29 Jan 2014, 22:58
Location: Dordrecht

Re: Aston Martin wants hyper-car to be faster than F1 cars

Post

AratzH wrote:Is this an ECO version of AM's hypercar or was it a source of inspiration for Newey? :lol:

http://images.cdn.autocar.co.uk/sites/a ... k=t3KBxJpV

https://ecourbanlab.com/wp-content/uplo ... BANLAB.jpg
Well... a Porsche 911 also started off, more or less, as a (fast) variation of a Volkswagen Beetle...