Mercs turned to Daimler to sort their start issues...Andres125sx wrote:Yeah Mercedes starts are better than Manor, Renault and Sauber... you proved me wrong!Juzh wrote:Just look at this horrendous start from hamilton here. /sAndres125sx wrote: Mercedes PU is the best, but they´ve also struggled at many starts. People usually say that´s due to the clutch but, may be possible that their electric motor/setup is optimized for higher revs what makes them struggle at the starts?
https://youtu.be/ChTPzkW9VQo?t=5s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4POGsCda_c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaiJ12YJc3A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQch7B0WXOY
Drivers errors/bad start procedure. There's nothing to suggest merc PU is in any way responsible for some of their bad starts. But then again, if you go and look you will find some bad starts from any driver.Andres125sx wrote:Yeah Mercedes starts are better than Manor, Renault and Sauber... you proved me wrong!Juzh wrote:Just look at this horrendous start from hamilton here. /sAndres125sx wrote: Mercedes PU is the best, but they´ve also struggled at many starts. People usually say that´s due to the clutch but, may be possible that their electric motor/setup is optimized for higher revs what makes them struggle at the starts?
https://youtu.be/ChTPzkW9VQo?t=5s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4POGsCda_c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaiJ12YJc3A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQch7B0WXOY
Yes. Question is how much.GoranF1 wrote:can Honda extract more power from SPA update by software optimization in Monza,Singapoure...?
There's probably a nice amount of drivability they can improve, under braking and out of corners for instance, better throttle response, there's a lot that can improve particularly under trail braking, where and how the MGU-K starts harvesting. Which is essentially braking with the rear wheels, as in brake steer. Ensuring that the engine delivers power predictably and smoothly as well as the electric motors is something that can always be improved. Not to mention any other systems on the car that depend on the power unit, such as the drive train, and other "stuff" that may or may not exist.gianluca.mateo wrote:Yes. Question is how much.GoranF1 wrote:can Honda extract more power from SPA update by software optimization in Monza,Singapoure...?
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
Yes there is, or there was as lately their starts are consistently better.Juzh wrote:Drivers errors/bad start procedure. There's nothing to suggest merc PU is in any way responsible for some of their bad starts. But then again, if you go and look you will find some bad starts from any driver.Andres125sx wrote:Yeah Mercedes starts are better than Manor, Renault and Sauber... you proved me wrong!Juzh wrote: Just look at this horrendous start from hamilton here. /s
https://youtu.be/ChTPzkW9VQo?t=5s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4POGsCda_c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaiJ12YJc3A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQch7B0WXOY
PlatinumZealot wrote:Optimizing the software brings a whole lot because the Power unit's energy management is programmed to the track being raced on. How it harvest, deploys, the throttle response etc. The peak power is more or less whatever they can squeeze out on the dyno, but the dynamics of drive ability and energy management is tuned to each circuit. They turn the wick up if things look good after some laps.
I would think "IF" Honda currently has that capability, then they surely do exactly as you suggest to give them a ballpark estimate map to work with. Of course once the physical car is on track the mapping will have to be adjusted to driver input, temp, humidity, tires, fuel load, downforce, etc. As stated earlier in this thread, dyno can only simulate so much. When you get on track and compare actual "car on track" data to sim data then you adjust car maps for current conditions and then send the data to the dyno personnel to input into their system for more accurate future dyno simulations.Brian Coat wrote:PlatinumZealot wrote:Optimizing the software brings a whole lot because the Power unit's energy management is programmed to the track being raced on. How it harvest, deploys, the throttle response etc. The peak power is more or less whatever they can squeeze out on the dyno, but the dynamics of drive ability and energy management is tuned to each circuit. They turn the wick up if things look good after some laps.
Why wouldn't you look to optimise much of that on a whole-powertrain dynamic dyno with models of each circuit and enjoy the benefits as early as possible?