PlatinumZealot wrote:Manoah2u wrote:It might be a game to keep pushing on the issue of how prize money is shared. I do believe Manor is in trouble. If there wasn't a big rule-change next year (format) then
I don't think it would have done so much damage, but in this case, i do think it'll have a hefty impact.
Nevertheless, even though i disgust the Sauber team to the core by now - Kaltenborn is an absolute disease to the team. I can't stand her nor what has happened to the team.
All I see is lies, lies, lies and infinite hypocrisy. I can't stand they lucked themselves into that finish in Brazil, but the fact is, they DID do it, and manor DIDNT.
I think your views are unfounded though. I don't hear Peter Sauber complaining so to me she is doing a good job.
You're entitled to an opinion. Even if it's wrong.
edu2703 wrote:
Good job? Since when do you follow F1? Since Monisha became team leader, Peter Sauber is a 'nobody' on the team.
Monisha's administration has been rated by F1 journalists as 'bad', marked by the 'Drivegate' scandal in 2015, when it was discovered that Monisha has signed with four drivers for two seats. (Nasr, Ericsson, Bianchi and Van de Garde). Giedo filed a lawsuit against Sauber in Melborne to secure a seat on the team.
Not only that. Monisha has already made bad decisions, as to use 2016 engines next season. Now very close to making another bad decision: Hire Esteban Gutierrez.
I don't understand: If Sauber was sold, why they still want a paydriver?
Gutierrez has NO talent, NO charisma and NO ONE wants him in F1. Hiring him is literally destroying the team's image and having another bad season.
a little remark on driver-gate in 2015:
Kaltenborn, a trained lawyer....upon asked whether she was still competent to run the team, Kaltenborn replied: 'I don't see it (the case) having any effect.
Pressed on whether she had considered resigning, Kaltenborn added: 'I've not considered that.
LOL!
Well, her somehow maintaining her position doesn't mean there is no after-effect.
'This whole matter does not have any effect on the way we work, the way the team works.'
Kaltenborn conceded, however, the past week had affected morale with the team's name dragged through the courts.
'It's had a very negative impact on the team because the situation was, for a while, unclear,' added Kaltenborn.
The legal argument resulted in Sauber failing to take to the track for the opening practice session of the year at Melbourne's Albert Park.
as for driving the '16 PU in '17:
The Swiss team will continue with the same 2016-specification Ferrari power units for next season, in order to concentrate on ‘chassis and performance development’.
With Sauber unwilling to wait for the specifications of next year’s Ferrari power unit to come through, Sauber have elected to run this year’s power units
lol lol lol
Sauber team principal Monisha Kaltenborn confirmed that the idea to run an existing power unit was taken some time ago, prior to their takeover by Longbow Finance in the summer.
as for Nasr ;
A point of contention, Kaltenborn admitted, was recent reports that Sauber may have actively sabotaged Nasr's car.
"Do you think we would be crazy enough to give up the fight for a better place in the championship and all the financial implications that has?" she bristled.
Ehmmm. actually, yeah, we DO believe you would be crazy enough. Crazy enough to sign 4 drivers, and the inability to 'fix' the issue prior to a GP resulting in not being able to participate in certain events of the weekend, putting a huge 'blemish' on the image of F1.
I think a decent representation of what is the Sauber F1 team is as following:
yet more proof of the exponential fail-force that is the result of having super-plague Kaltenborn in the team :
i rest my case.