Keep in mind that last year's bridgestones required relatively forward weight bias. Also remember that what we may speculate from looking at pictures isn't necessarily what is actually happening on the car (performance-wise).timbo wrote:Seems like they moved aerobalance to the front. And that protruding front wing with thick profile also suggests that they are also concerned with front weigth distribution. I wonder wouldn't it lead to the excessive oversteer and how oversteering attitude combines with lack of throttle control?
That's for sure=)... But that's what lots of us would do anyway;)bettonracing wrote:Also remember that what we may speculate from looking at pictures isn't necessarily what is actually happening on the car (performance-wise).
Using liquids as ballast isn't allowed I think. They use some extra heavy alloy for that (forgot the name of it).rkn wrote:what kind of ballast do they use? I'm thniking water especially if they place it inside a wing, but water might also be too light...?!
Just like:manchild wrote:3-blade front wing, yes, but look how it is attached to nose. Not via first blade like on Mclaren in 2005 but via second element.
bar555 wrote:Any links to high - res pictures
(classic question , i know)