wesley123 wrote:Andres125sx wrote:They´ve done that for the past 15 years and they´ve solved nothing. Audience continue decreasing despite there´s new venues at countries where there had never been before.
They solved nothing because there is nothing to solve. There is no problem here. F1 gets a fixed amount from the organisators to hold the venue, if then only one person shows up in the grandstands is, just like turning a profit, not F1's problem
That´s very debatable. It´s not his problem today, but if that trend continue the venue will stop hosting a GP, and F1 will stop receiving the fee. Now it´s F1 problem, their income has been reduced.
They can always go to some other country, but at some point people will realize hosting a F1 GP is only a marketing investment with no direct revenue because fees are too high and tickets sales too low to make it profitable.
IMHO that´s a huge problem for F1, they´re increasing fees, and ignoring the root of the problem, wich is F1 is no longer an interesting motorsport for new fans.
Basically their strategy is compensating the drop in fanbase with higher prices for the remaining fans. Higher track fees means higher ticket prices, and higher TV fees means they go PPV so it´s fans who in the end pay those increases.
But if some day the fanbase is so low they (hosters and TVs) can´t make it profitable, F1 will go to bankrupt. And once that point is reached there will be no salvation for F1, as the fanbase will be too low.
Fanbase is what makes any sport a business, no fanbase, no business.
wesley123 wrote:New venues at Rusia, Arab Emirates, Malaysia, China, Singapore, Azerbaijan, Bahrain... have not been enough to compensate the audiece drop.
But that's not really a problem in their business model.
And that´s exactly the problem, their business model. Or to be more precise, MrE business model.
Some people must be thinking MrE do the best for F1. No, he only do the best for himself. Not a complain, he´s a business man. But what a motorsport like F1 does need is very different to what a 86 years old man need. F1 does need some long term plan. MrE does not, so he´s been squeezing F1 as much as possible. For that his strategy is great, increase fees so the income can even be raised, if the sport fanbase dissapear and the business go to bankrupt in some years that´s not a problem for him, he´ll be retired enjoying the millions he earned
Their business model is great for intant revenue, but IMHO extremely harmfull for the long term.
wesley123 wrote:Means that there´re more people on traditional countries who did follow F1 but is no longer interested, than new people on new countries that start watching. Simple maths
I do not doubt that. I fully agree; there is less viewership. But between that decline and F1's revenue, is that really a problem? While viewership has dropped, F1's revenue has increased. And in a system with shareholders, revenue is of importance.
Off course its very important. But not the only important factor, at least if you want a wealthy business in the long term.
wesley123 wrote:If they want F1 to become a toy for petrodollar millionaires they´re doing great. Otherwise F1 is on a serious problem
F1 would have had a problem if there was an alternative, which there isn't. The calendars (mostly) do not conflict, which means that even if there is an alternative, F1 still has all their reach.
I can agree to some extent with this, but then, do they rely on the lack of alternatives to keep F1 alive?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c17d/0c17d8229049d2323b4ee9c4ee76e5c8074c85fa" alt="d'oh! #-o"