OkAndres125sx wrote:They´ve done that for the past 15 years and they´ve solved nothing. Audience continue decreasing despite there´s new venues at countries where there had never been before.wesley123 wrote:Simple, as has been done before; Go to another venue.Andres125sx wrote: Thanks to the increase in fees, both for tracks and TVs.
But if people buying those tickets and subscriptions continue the drop trend it´s just a matter of time revenues start decreasing too.
What will they do once audience is so low revenue can´t be compensated increasing fees? Moreover, before reaching that point there will be a cascade effect. If audience is low, sponsors are no longer interested on paying huge ammounts of money. No money, and F1 is done
New venues at Rusia, Arab Emirates, Malaysia, China, Singapore, Azerbaijan, Bahrain... have not been enough to compensate the audiece drop. Even with all those new countries, audience continue falling. That means something about audience in ´traditional´ countries, means that A LOT of people is no longer interested in F1 and is not watching anymore. Means that there´re more people on traditional countries who did follow F1 but is no longer interested, than new people on new countries that start watching. Simple maths
If they want F1 to become a toy for petrodollar millionaires they´re doing great. Otherwise F1 is on a serious problem
Actually most of the points were opinion which can be considered neither right or wrong. Except for the 'tyres dictate strategy' part which is correct because they do... but its a moot point because they are just about the only pit-stop variable so the strategy has to be about tyres.ChrisM40 wrote:Just because something is a cliché, it doesn't make it wrong. Most of those points are right, even if the details in his post arent always.
Rubbish! Nostalgia was much better before the internet came along...Facts Only wrote:
Remember though everything was better in the old days, it always is according to people on the internet.
Do you disagree with any of them? If so, please explainFacts Only wrote:Blimey you've really gone all in to get as many of the same-old-same-old F1 complaints into one post.
- A dig at Bernie; Check
- Tyres are rubbish; Check
- The designs are the same; Check
- DRS has ruined F1; Check
That´s only because I forgot itFacts Only wrote:If only you had mentioned the way the prize money is distributed you would have had the full set of cliche' F1 moans.
Ok agree with this, I did word it quite poorly. I meant with current tires drivers need to nurse them independently of their strategy, as pushing will destroy them in 1-2 laps. Proper tires should allow for much more laps pushing, tire industry must have evolved and F1 cars are not as fast as they have been previously, so I see no reason to assume pushing tires will destroy them in 1-2 laps.Facts Only wrote:The one thing that baffles me, you say that "Strategies depend on tyres" well what on earth else are they going to depend on? the engineers toilet breaks? I suppose we could bring back refuelling.... and then listen to everyone complain about how "races are only won in the pits" and "all the overtaking is in the pits" blah blah blah
Lucky you, here in Spain only in Alonso era it was that popular, but even in that era not so many people actually watched the GPs. Many people find it too long, too complicated to follow, or not exciting enough (euphemism of boringFacts Only wrote:Also this is just plain BS "Even 20 years ago F1 was not a general public motorsport" I remember 25 years ago Mansell mania taking over, then Schumacher v Hill was headline news for years. People sat an watched F1 on Sunday afternoons as families.
Funny that, because the most popular sport in Spain is one that has a horrendous gap between rich and poor, is dominated by two richest teams, the game is around the same duration as a GP and for a lot of that time not very much happens!Andres125sx wrote: Lucky you, here in Spain only in Alonso era it was that popular, but even in that era not so many people actually watched the GPs. Many people find it too long, too complicated to follow, or not exciting enough (euphemism of boring)
I did mention Hill v Schumacher in my initial post.Just_a_fan wrote:Some of us cheered for Hill against Schuey too, it wasn't straight from Our Nige to Lewis/Jenson...
But football can be played by almost everyone and its super easy to follow. Moreover, in Spain exists an obsessive culture of praising the winner so most of the people support Real Madrid or Barsa, just ignoring the fact that its boring to see always the same two teams winning everything.zac510 wrote:Funny that, because the most popular sport in Spain is one that has a horrendous gap between rich and poor, is dominated by two richest teams, the game is around the same duration as a GP and for a lot of that time not very much happens!Andres125sx wrote: Lucky you, here in Spain only in Alonso era it was that popular, but even in that era not so many people actually watched the GPs. Many people find it too long, too complicated to follow, or not exciting enough (euphemism of boring)
Of course drivers are key, but they´re not the only parameter affecting viewership. Things like competitiveness are important, as it is to cause some excitement in the audience.Facts Only wrote:So while we don't actually disagree about many of your points I think you are wrong to blame tyres/cars/DRS and you have actually made the point that drivers draw people in.
And even so there´s the unpredictable factor wich can make, for example, that Celta de Vigo beats and send home a big team like Real Madrid from the Cupzac510 wrote:Funny that, because the most popular sport in Spain is one that has a horrendous gap between rich and poor, is dominated by two richest teams, the game is around the same duration as a GP and for a lot of that time not very much happens!Andres125sx wrote: Lucky you, here in Spain only in Alonso era it was that popular, but even in that era not so many people actually watched the GPs. Many people find it too long, too complicated to follow, or not exciting enough (euphemism of boring)
And to Alonso himself, what is even more absurdVasconia wrote: Then, all those oportunits started to talk about F1 whithot having any idea about the sport, behaving like fanatics and showing 0 respect to Alonso´s rivals.
I have never done it! I could just blame those fanatisc(and Lobato too because he was responsable too).Andres125sx wrote:And to Alonso himself, what is even more absurdVasconia wrote: Then, all those oportunits started to talk about F1 whithot having any idea about the sport, behaving like fanatics and showing 0 respect to Alonso´s rivals.![]()
But there are fanatics at any sport, you can´t blame a sport because of the fanatics supporting it