PlatinumZealot wrote:Glad i am not the only onw that think so!toraabe wrote:Sounds very similar to the PU106D.
Mainly because of the length of the plenum.
http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/vide ... 62058.html
PlatinumZealot wrote:Glad i am not the only onw that think so!toraabe wrote:Sounds very similar to the PU106D.
Mainly because of the length of the plenum.
http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/vide ... 62058.html
Interesting idea. Line 5.14.1 states that all air entering the engine must pass through the normal, regulated intake. The turbine is defined as part of the engine. So the feed for the pump would have to split off the main intake. The braking regs say that no other system except for the PU may provide a braking force. Whether or not adding a pneumatic pump & reservoir to the PU would specifically contravene any rules, I'm unsure.FW17 wrote:Rather than a hydraulic system they could use a open pneumatic system connected to the front wheels to store energy in a pressure vessel during braking. Then the same air can be let out into the exhaust to blow the turbine there by
1)reducing backpressure and increasing power
2)increasing generation from MGUH
(But I think there are regulations about feeding air into the exhaust and intake system)
You have to change that pressure into electrical energy at some stage.PlatinumZealot wrote:Piston compressor or rotary screw compressor would work. Both are normally heavy items.. But can be engineered to be light weight...
U either will put these in the front wheel hubs. Or use front driveshaft.. Or rear gearbox. Since they recovered air pressure is not part of the regulated MJ from braking?
Oh.. you should of just referenced the Audi air hybrid system. Most here are probably familiar with it. You just lost me when started talking about hydrostatic drive. I was thinking of torque converters or escalators.godlameroso wrote:You have an accumulator act as a reservoir to store hydraulic pressure, much like the fuel pump is driven by the engine to create 500bar pressure, you could charge an accumulator with hydraulic pressure from a gear driven by the transmission input shaft or crankshaft or like any other engine ancillary. You would store this hydraulic pressure independent of the ES and release it to directly drive the MGU-K when needed. This system would be completely separate from the ERS system.
According to the energy flow chart, the engine ancillaries can send power to and from the MGU-K
http://static.sportskeeda.com/wp-conten ... 24x606.jpg
And any non ERS energy storage can recover up to 300kJ. Or about 2 seconds of extra deployment. Although those 300kJ don't specify if they have the same per lap requirement as the ES to MGU-K
Here are the regulations regarding 5.13
5.13 Engine ancillaries :
All coolant pumps, oil pumps, scavenge pumps, oil/air separators, hydraulic pumps and fuel pumps delivering more than 10bar must be mechanically driven directly from the engine and/or MGU-K with a fixed speed ratio.
I thought FW17 was implying using the stored air pressure to boost the engine through the compressor inlet so i was never thinking of conversion to electrical energy. So the system would be separate from the ERS. Basically a cheat system.wuzak wrote:You have to change that pressure into electrical energy at some stage.PlatinumZealot wrote:Piston compressor or rotary screw compressor would work. Both are normally heavy items.. But can be engineered to be light weight...
U either will put these in the front wheel hubs. Or use front driveshaft.. Or rear gearbox. Since they recovered air pressure is not part of the regulated MJ from braking?
How would you do that?
The MGUK is restricted to recovering 2MJ - whether it is from braking or form loading the engine under acceleration.
Also, as stated above, the non-ERS energy store can be no larger than 300kJ, while no more than 20kJ could be recovered by a non ERS (ie not MGUK or MGUH) system at greater than 2kW. The cost of the weight and complexity of such a system would surely be greater than the benefit?
I think that is not allowed:PlatinumZealot wrote:I thought FW17 was implying using the stored air pressure to boost the engine through the compressor inlet so i was never thinking of conversion to electrical energy. So the system would be separate from the ERS. Basically a cheat system.wuzak wrote:You have to change that pressure into electrical energy at some stage.PlatinumZealot wrote:Piston compressor or rotary screw compressor would work. Both are normally heavy items.. But can be engineered to be light weight...
U either will put these in the front wheel hubs. Or use front driveshaft.. Or rear gearbox. Since they recovered air pressure is not part of the regulated MJ from braking?
How would you do that?
The MGUK is restricted to recovering 2MJ - whether it is from braking or form loading the engine under acceleration.
Also, as stated above, the non-ERS energy store can be no larger than 300kJ, while no more than 20kJ could be recovered by a non ERS (ie not MGUK or MGUH) system at greater than 2kW. The cost of the weight and complexity of such a system would surely be greater than the benefit?
wuzak wrote: I think that is not allowed:
5.1.6 Pressure charging may only be effected by the use of a sole single stage compressor linked to a sole single stage exhaust turbine by a shaft assembly parallel to the engine crankshaft and within 25mm of the car centre line. The shaft must be designed so as to ensure that the shaft assembly, the compressor and the turbine always rotate about a common axis and at the same angular velocity, an electrical motor generator (MGU-H) may be directly coupled to it. The shaft may not be mechanically linked to any other device.
FW17 wrote:wuzak wrote: I think that is not allowed:
5.1.6 Pressure charging may only be effected by the use of a sole single stage compressor linked to a sole single stage exhaust turbine by a shaft assembly parallel to the engine crankshaft and within 25mm of the car centre line. The shaft must be designed so as to ensure that the shaft assembly, the compressor and the turbine always rotate about a common axis and at the same angular velocity, an electrical motor generator (MGU-H) may be directly coupled to it. The shaft may not be mechanically linked to any other device.
The idea was for the compressed air to run the turbine to generate more and ease back pressure. Bit it is not possible as all air must enter the engine only through the compressor and exit through the turbine, so cannot add more air into the system.
But as suggested by others recovery can be made to run ancillaries
How about something like the MAN hydro drive but instead of sending power to the wheels it sends it to the MGU-K, assuming of course you can make a complex enough hydraulic system incorporating the engine, and brake pedal to technically be compliant with the regulations.roon wrote:Massage chair for driver.
I still like the idea for a water or oil pump that has a pump stage used only under braking, and an motor stage used during acceleration. Both modes of operation would flow fluid through the engine & radiators. An accumulator with a compressible gas would be incorporated into the system, storing & releasing pressurized fluid from, & to, the pump-motor. System design and/or regulators would prevent the engine & radiators from seeing high pressure fluids.
FW17, for your front axle pneumatic-ERS, I think you can draw the air post inlet, pre compressor, to feed the front axle compressor/ERS. Then dumped through the turbine. Satisfies the wording, maybe not the spirit.
The water or oil pumps, I believe, are required to be driven from the crankshaft.roon wrote:Massage chair for driver.
I still like the idea for a water or oil pump that has a pump stage used only under braking, and an motor stage used during acceleration. Both modes of operation would flow fluid through the engine & radiators. An accumulator with a compressible gas would be incorporated into the system, storing & releasing pressurized fluid from, & to, the pump-motor. System design and/or regulators would prevent the engine & radiators from seeing high pressure fluids.
FW17, for your front axle pneumatic-ERS, I think you can draw the air post inlet, pre compressor, to feed the front axle compressor/ERS. Then dumped through the turbine. Satisfies the wording, maybe not the spirit.
You could have a second "booster" turbine connected to the compressor shaft that uses the accumulated air pressure to spin up the compressor. It would not be piped to the main air stream but simply blows thru this booster turbine to atmosphere.wuzak wrote:I think that is not allowed:PlatinumZealot wrote:I thought FW17 was implying using the stored air pressure to boost the engine through the compressor inlet so i was never thinking of conversion to electrical energy. So the system would be separate from the ERS. Basically a cheat system.wuzak wrote:
You have to change that pressure into electrical energy at some stage.
How would you do that?
The MGUK is restricted to recovering 2MJ - whether it is from braking or form loading the engine under acceleration.
Also, as stated above, the non-ERS energy store can be no larger than 300kJ, while no more than 20kJ could be recovered by a non ERS (ie not MGUK or MGUH) system at greater than 2kW. The cost of the weight and complexity of such a system would surely be greater than the benefit?
5.1.6 Pressure charging may only be effected by the use of a sole single stage compressor linked to a sole single stage exhaust turbine by a shaft assembly parallel to the engine crankshaft and within 25mm of the car centre line. The shaft must be designed so as to ensure that the shaft assembly, the compressor and the turbine always rotate about a common axis and at the same angular velocity, an electrical motor generator (MGU-H) may be directly coupled to it. The shaft may not be mechanically linked to any other device.
Correct. I didn't mean to suggest otherwise.wuzak wrote: The water or oil pumps, I believe, are required to be driven from the crankshaft.