manchild wrote:Old school? It is the first modern car with raised nose with no struts to carry front wing but one blade incorporated as wing carrier. Definitely best suspension geometry of all keel less cars so far (wishbones horizontal) + very low front end of chassis and nose meaning lower overall COG .
I agree that it looks as the mid section of rear blade is choked by nose BUT we have no idea how nose looks from below. What if only vertical sides and top are as it seams while in fact nose and chassis bottom are shaped as a diffuser? Ok, that would make it two-keel car than. I bet nose isn't flat at its bottom.
Me too! And it was not only hope, but Renault's webmaster has suggested it should change! They even repainted some trucks / motorhome with new graphical theme. I'm deeply disapointed they kept it like that. Even their fans hate it!modbaraban wrote:Arrrgh!!! I hoped to see a new paint scheme
Apparently this isn't the case:manchild wrote:Here is what I had in mind.
Longitudinal cross section of nose
I would say that the tunnel is formed in two sections; the nosecone and the tub. The nose cone starts the tunnel, then the keel\wishbone mounts forms the sides of the tunnel under the tub, the roof of the tunnel is the usual underside of the monocoque. Once the sides\keels end (as i said at the rear leg of the wishbone) the tunnel is flat and the sides of the tub radius out to send the flow around the sidepods.Spencifer_Murphy wrote:I knew it! Thanks scarbs. (I'd like to claim it was a most intelligent guess on my part - but really it was pure blind luck. )
Scarbs, you said the "tunnel" (if we can call it that) stretches back to the wishbones. But at that point how does it stop - or rather, how does it join the rest of the nose (or the "twin-keels") if you like? Is it a smooth gradient that eventually joins the rest of the nose?
Kinda like on Machild's sketech, where he draws the tunnel sloping up away from the apparent sides of the nose, does it do the same thing at the aft section of this tunnel.
Hope I've been clear enough lol. Sorry if not.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=5084&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=26manchild, Post Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:07 pm wrote:I agree that it looks as the mid section of rear blade is choked by nose BUT we have no idea how nose looks from below. What if only vertical sides and top are as it seams while in fact nose and chassis bottom are shaped as a diffuser? Ok, that would make it two-keel car than. I bet nose isn't flat at its bottom.