That photo is a great catch. I wonder if the flow is diverting towards rear tyre from diffuser ramp solely because of Venturi vortices or because of vortex produced by the trip fence. Probably both...Sevach wrote:
What kind of sensor is this?Sevach wrote:...https://imgr1.auto-motor-und-sport.de/L ... 042662.jpg
Maybe a sensor to measure wing flex.humble sabot wrote:What kind of sensor is this?Sevach wrote:...https://imgr1.auto-motor-und-sport.de/L ... 042662.jpg
Related to the camera they were using earlier to watch the wing perhaps?
It's slim waist, wide hips, Mercedes is the opposite.PlatinumZealot wrote:Williams reminds me of a pregnant gold fish. It could be the air to air intercooler why the midsection has to be so wide.
Interesting Pat Symonds did not follow the Colin Chapman school of thought (keep the car as short and compact as possible).LookBackTime wrote:2017 wheelbase and rake for Williams FW40
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C64IIdlW0AAPiku.jpg
How come? Williams is the shortest 2017 car according to that numbers.Mr Brooksy wrote:Interesting Pat Symonds did not follow the Colin Chapman school of thought (keep the car as short and compact as possible).LookBackTime wrote:2017 wheelbase and rake for Williams FW40
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C64IIdlW0AAPiku.jpg
Whereas the Mercedes looks longer and more slender in all the photos I've seen but clearly isn't.
Woops, was reading the wrong years column, my bad!Ft5fTL wrote:How come? Williams is the shortest 2017 car according to that numbers.Mr Brooksy wrote:Interesting Pat Symonds did not follow the Colin Chapman school of thought (keep the car as short and compact as possible).LookBackTime wrote:2017 wheelbase and rake for Williams FW40
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C64IIdlW0AAPiku.jpg
Whereas the Mercedes looks longer and more slender in all the photos I've seen but clearly isn't.