I don't think Honda MotoGP is in the same framework or event talks to Honda F1. Completelly different parent companies within the conglomerate.J.A.W. wrote:Mudflap wrote:I don't think it is the technical level that is lacking - it's the experience.PlatinumZealot wrote:Vibration issues with the crank is too easy to sniff out and solve contrasted against the worry that Hasegawa expressed. I think us westerners seriously underestimate Honda's technical level. A crank balance problem? for an F1 engine maker who made 20k rpm engines in the past? I don't think sooo..
F1 is a completely different discipline and knowing where to cut corners and when to pay special attention is not something that is learned from a book nor from designing road engines.
Very little in an F1 engine runs to published parameters (temperatures, factors of strength, bearing limits, mass flows etc) but it is the experience that dictates where 0.9 will work instead of the 'book limit' of 1.2. Honda have to rediscover all these by themselves with very limited resources.
It is also easy to forget that in EU there is a massive engineering base - for example in UK you have Merc, Ilmor, Cosworth and Mahle that literally share the same postcode and there is a massive supply chain built around them. They have access to specialized suppliers that have been in the motorsport business for a very long time. Engineers are much more inclined to move around and share their knowledge whereas in Japan it is common for engineers to spend their entire career at a single company.
Honda does however, have a great deal of MotoGP/Superbike/MX racing engineering expertise, as
well as a long history of building high performance production cars, which are also regularly raced.
Those engineers are rotated through the Honda organisation which also extends through marine, aviation, agricultural & industrial power unit research - development, & production, so they are no - 'small beer'...
Obviously, correct me if I'm wrong.