From what i heard it does because its impossible to take it off....its just not runed as it is supposed to.JonoNic wrote: ↑08 Apr 2017, 11:182.7 sec off Hamilton's Q1 pole is much better than the predicted 'last and second last' placings. I just hope that the spec 2 PU has even more potential. The current PU is still not using TJI right?GoranF1 wrote:Car looks from onboard alot less twichy then for example the Renault who finished 6th i think?
Just need that spec 2 Honda now.
Sent from my SM-A700F using Tapatalk
Balance wise i see nothing worng....almost no correction on the steering wheel at all?
GoranF1 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2017, 16:00Balance wise i see nothing worng....almost no correction on the steering wheel at all?
It seems that the problems start in the 5 gear slightly, 6,7,8 gear is more accused.Jef Patat wrote: ↑08 Apr 2017, 16:00No strange upshift sounds anymore. Car looks very stable
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79_z1ufKxnQ
Without anyone in front to be able to use the drs and someone behind the neck to shot drs seems to be easy to overtake.
brazil last year is a bad example. button was sleeping and Alonso had a spin. his fight back from where he ended up was the next best thing after Verstappen that racemrluke wrote: ↑08 Apr 2017, 18:55Once again the circuit with all the long straights that was expected to show up just how weak the Honda engine is, instead gives a pretty solid performance.
It's clearly not working at its best but I don't think it's that far off say the Renault pu. Need to do a bit of analysis on it.
I'm going to say that if it's a wet race then don't expect Mclaren to do that well, think Brazil last year. Their chassis / down force is not really their strength.
Overall its good to see that Mclaren Honda are still knocking on the door of q3 despite all the doom and gloom.
There's a Q2 video above, where do you see lack of DF?mrluke wrote: ↑08 Apr 2017, 18:55Once again the circuit with all the long straights that was expected to show up just how weak the Honda engine is, instead gives a pretty solid performance.
It's clearly not working at its best but I don't think it's that far off say the Renault pu. Need to do a bit of analysis on it.
I'm going to say that if it's a wet race then don't expect Mclaren to do that well, think Brazil last year. Their chassis / down force is not really their strength.
Overall its good to see that Mclaren Honda are still knocking on the door of q3 despite all the doom and gloom.
Mclaren's pace defecit is laregely obscured by Alonso's absolutely stellar driving. If you compare VanDoorne, who supposedly is 'this big thing', then the difference is massive. I've only seen VD struggle, whilst Alonso just does what is best and actually gets it there. It's amazing he was P9 for a seriously long time, it's a shame he couldnt repeat that in Q2 but p13 is rather stellar for what they're dealing with. Especially since Australia 'seemed lucky' but rather is starting to show Alonso's capacity, really. Only hampered by the technical problems of the MCL32, which cost him his result in AUS. Hopefully, that won't be the case in china. 17 kmh speed difference on the straight with Mercedes, is insane to still put it there.mrluke wrote: ↑08 Apr 2017, 18:55Once again the circuit with all the long straights that was expected to show up just how weak the Honda engine is, instead gives a pretty solid performance.
It's clearly not working at its best but I don't think it's that far off say the Renault pu. Need to do a bit of analysis on it.
I'm going to say that if it's a wet race then don't expect Mclaren to do that well, think Brazil last year. Their chassis / down force is not really their strength.
Overall its good to see that Mclaren Honda are still knocking on the door of q3 despite all the doom and gloom.