Actually since 2012, so this is the 6th season with the v6t.bblundell72 wrote: ↑12 Apr 2017, 14:31Indycar engine is no longer a V8. It is a 2.2-liter, twin-turbocharged, V6 engine. Has been for 3 years.
Actually since 2012, so this is the 6th season with the v6t.bblundell72 wrote: ↑12 Apr 2017, 14:31Indycar engine is no longer a V8. It is a 2.2-liter, twin-turbocharged, V6 engine. Has been for 3 years.
Well, the Indy 500 is one of the worlds biggest one day sport events in the world. I can't see that being a bad thing, also considering the US probably has a big potential market for sponsoring.Cold Fussion wrote: ↑12 Apr 2017, 18:31Clearly I don't understand marketing because to me having your star driver actively not representing your brand at the most prestigious event for F1 is not positive exposure.BosF1 wrote: ↑12 Apr 2017, 17:07Exposure for the McLaren brand. McLaren needs a title sponsor, Alonso needs another challenge.Cold Fussion wrote: ↑12 Apr 2017, 17:05
How does it benefit Mclaren that their star driver, who they pay millions a year, will not be driving at arguably the most important GP of the F1 calendar (especially for underpowered Mclaren) to instead par-take in a completely unrelated motorsport event?
And unlike in F1, the V6Ts are almost-universally loved by Indycar fans.Pierce89 wrote: ↑12 Apr 2017, 19:27Actually since 2012, so this is the 6th season with the v6t.bblundell72 wrote: ↑12 Apr 2017, 14:31Indycar engine is no longer a V8. It is a 2.2-liter, twin-turbocharged, V6 engine. Has been for 3 years.
(Not my personal opinion) It's noise. The brutally efficient engineering, design and innovation is all completely judged on its (lack of) ability to waste energy, indycar is just a V6 with a pair of turbos strapped to it.Selvariabell wrote: ↑12 Apr 2017, 20:35And unlike in F1, the V6Ts are almost-universally loved by Indycar fans.Pierce89 wrote: ↑12 Apr 2017, 19:27Actually since 2012, so this is the 6th season with the v6t.bblundell72 wrote: ↑12 Apr 2017, 14:31
Indycar engine is no longer a V8. It is a 2.2-liter, twin-turbocharged, V6 engine. Has been for 3 years.
Why is that though?
I think you have hit the spot.BosF1 wrote: ↑12 Apr 2017, 17:07Exposure for the McLaren brand. McLaren needs a title sponsor, Alonso needs another challenge.Cold Fussion wrote: ↑12 Apr 2017, 17:05How does it benefit Mclaren that their star driver, who they pay millions a year, will not be driving at arguably the most important GP of the F1 calendar (especially for underpowered Mclaren) to instead par-take in a completely unrelated motorsport event?
haha no. Do it more
It's a great move. The brand could do well for this, in America, Alonso's profile could rise, he has something to be enthusiastic about and motivate him for a while and fingers crossed by then, they will have a car that he can fight with. All in all it will help get them through a difficult period as a team. Well done Zak Brown and Honda.JuanjoTS wrote: ↑12 Apr 2017, 20:48I think you have hit the spot.BosF1 wrote: ↑12 Apr 2017, 17:07Exposure for the McLaren brand. McLaren needs a title sponsor, Alonso needs another challenge.Cold Fussion wrote: ↑12 Apr 2017, 17:05
How does it benefit Mclaren that their star driver, who they pay millions a year, will not be driving at arguably the most important GP of the F1 calendar (especially for underpowered Mclaren) to instead par-take in a completely unrelated motorsport event?
It is promoted as a brand in the big US market, both Honda and McLaren, with possibility to find sponsor for the F1. In a year in which there is no ALO, they give you the possibility to get closer to the triple crown, giving ALO an incentive to continue in McHonda for another 5 years. It's a master play.mwillems wrote: ↑12 Apr 2017, 21:31It's a great move. The brand could do well for this, in America, Alonso's profile could rise, he has something to be enthusiastic about and motivate him for a while and fingers crossed by then, they will have a car that he can fight with. All in all it will help get them through a difficult period as a team. Well done Zak Brown and Honda.
GP2 engines ....700HP max.dren wrote: ↑12 Apr 2017, 15:30Indy never had the high revving engines that F1 fans grew accustom to. They still revved relatively high compared to road cars, but nothing like the 20k rpm machines of the past F1. I actually preferred the Indy cars. You could feel the growl of the engines on your chest as they flew down the straight.