But have they? Are Mclaren running noticeably skinnier wings than the other teams?
Vandoorne said they did, after getting eliminated in Q1.
As bad as Honda is in relation to peak power/consumption, how can they be sure that Mercedes engine would flatter the chassis in the same way as Honda is? Is it as tight, light and with equal or better COG? If not, can they calculate in the difference and how would that affect the S1 and S2 times?
Yes. I hope the updated engine says shut up to all hatersdiffuser wrote: ↑11 Jun 2017, 16:48thanks for that GoranF1 ..
The head of Honda’s formula one project, Yusuke Hasegawa, did express feelings of disappointment.
“Of course we can not be satisfied with this result. But it would be wrong if we had brought the engine upgrade to Canada already. It is not completely ready. We would’ve loved to bring it here, because Montreal is a high power track, but it would’ve been a mistake. I can’t give you a date as to when it will come, but we are working hard on it. I hope it will be ready for the race in Baku. And in the mean time we’ll make small adjustments to the current engine.“
Sounds like they want the "UPGRADE" to be a sure thing when they do bring it.
They are talking very rude. Producing this kind of PU is much harder than making chassis and Mclaren couldn't do a winning chassis for a long time that gives Honda still a few years of tolerance if we give both side same amount of timeSoichiro wrote: ↑11 Jun 2017, 15:52As bad as Honda is in relation to peak power/consumption, how can they be sure that Mercedes engine would flatter the chassis in the same way as Honda is? Is it as tight, light and with equal or better COG? If not, can they calculate in the difference and how would that affect the S1 and S2 times?
I know McLaren has done the better (very good indeed) job this year, but I think some credit on that part should be given to Honda too.
I think Alonso and Vandoorne do not criticize Honda as much as Honda deservs...they are to mild to Honda.