Is that Alonso?
İf their one cylinder job were worked we were talking about very different things. I hope they will come up with 2016 merc level or something closej.yank wrote: ↑12 Jun 2017, 21:14I tried to figure out where the supposed 80-100 hp deficit of Maclaren-Honda to Mercedes is coming from. It seems that this is based on standard ET 1/4 mile Horse Power calculators that you can find on internet. You can get the speed and time for passing 1/4 mile from the onboard qualification laps of Alonso and Hamilton from here https://youtu.be/uCP79ZKMMdI and here https://youtu.be/yx6BbFTNyy0 . Look at the timing from the start of the final straight to the red lights on left that are slightly before the middle of the straight (if you look on Google Earth this is roughly 1/4 mile). However, you need a chronometer to get more precise timing. In this way, you see some very strange results. The Alonso time deficit is about 0.3 sec but surprisingly he is faster with about 10 km/h (note that this is 1/4 mile, not the full length of the straight). In this case, the only way the calculator could give 80-100 hp deficit is Maclaren-Honda to be about 10 kg lighter than Mercedes. This is very interesting. This means that Maclaren-Honda have better initial speed on the straights but don't have enough power to maintain this speed to the end or even to middle of the straight. Also, this means that Maclaren-Honda have very, very light car comparing to other cars, and Hasegava comments on this are in fact true (probably this also explains why they are so good in the corners). IMO if they successfully resolve the combustion and vibration problems in order to maintain this speed and keep the same weight of the car, with the upcoming update they suddenly could be ahead of the rest. I don't think that this is impossible.
Don't forget that the Honda uses much more fuel than the others. They are running "embarrassing power modes" all the time.GoranF1 wrote: ↑12 Jun 2017, 20:57I remeber looking at the time screen...Alonso was playing whit Stroll...he was 3 sec behind then in less than a lap the gap was 0.7....but he couldnt pass.McL-H wrote: ↑12 Jun 2017, 20:19I'd like to add to that, that Stroll couldn't manage to drive away from Alonso in anyway after using DRS to pass him. Alonso stayed within one second of Stroll for many laps. He could use DRS to keep up on the straights, but was in no way able to pass the Williams, while clearly being much faster in the corners.Joseki wrote: ↑12 Jun 2017, 13:43
Where did I mention traction and braking? I just stated a true fact: from mid straight the Honda PU is like a parachute behind the car.
It was clear when Stroll came out of the hairpin 30-40 meters behind and was in front of Alonso mid straight. And Stroll had used tyres against Fernando's fresh SS.
Bang. Clunk. Agh.
Here's what I think, Alonso is just pushing everything, if it breaks it doesn't bother him because he's not even in the points. Understanding what fails can go a long way to making it better.
I thought the same. It would go some way towards explaining the gap to Stoffel (different engine modes)godlameroso wrote: ↑13 Jun 2017, 03:29Here's what I think, Alonso is just pushing everything, if it breaks it doesn't bother him because he's not even in the points. Understanding what fails can go a long way to making it better.
Exit speed from last corner is not 0. it would explain why final speed is higher on mclaren compared to Merc even with time lost. Also i remember noticing comparison between merc and ferrari. Merc was setup for more strightline speed, ferrari was a bit more downforce for Corners.j.yank wrote: ↑12 Jun 2017, 21:14I tried to figure out where the supposed 80-100 hp deficit of Maclaren-Honda to Mercedes is coming from. It seems that this is based on standard ET 1/4 mile Horse Power calculators that you can find on internet. You can get the speed and time for passing 1/4 mile from the onboard qualification laps of Alonso and Hamilton from here https://youtu.be/uCP79ZKMMdI and here https://youtu.be/yx6BbFTNyy0 . Look at the timing from the start of the final straight to the red lights on left that are slightly before the middle of the straight (if you look on Google Earth this is roughly 1/4 mile). However, you need a chronometer to get more precise timing. In this way, you see some very strange results. The Alonso time deficit is about 0.3 sec but surprisingly he is faster with about 10 km/h (note that this is 1/4 mile, not the full length of the straight). In this case, the only way the calculator could give 80-100 hp deficit is Maclaren-Honda to be about 10 kg lighter than Mercedes. This is very interesting. This means that Maclaren-Honda have better initial speed on the straights but don't have enough power to maintain this speed to the end or even to middle of the straight. Also, this means that Maclaren-Honda have very, very light car comparing to other cars, and Hasegava comments on this are in fact true (probably this also explains why they are so good in the corners). IMO if they successfully resolve the combustion and vibration problems in order to maintain this speed and keep the same weight of the car, with the upcoming update they suddenly could be ahead of the rest. I don't think that this is impossible.
fuelsaving was made at the end of first stint. he lost ability to pit before kvyat and hulkenberg because of that. even lost positions to them.ZakB wrote: ↑12 Jun 2017, 23:19Don't forget that the Honda uses much more fuel than the others. They are running "embarrassing power modes" all the time.GoranF1 wrote: ↑12 Jun 2017, 20:57I remeber looking at the time screen...Alonso was playing whit Stroll...he was 3 sec behind then in less than a lap the gap was 0.7....but he couldnt pass.McL-H wrote: ↑12 Jun 2017, 20:19
I'd like to add to that, that Stroll couldn't manage to drive away from Alonso in anyway after using DRS to pass him. Alonso stayed within one second of Stroll for many laps. He could use DRS to keep up on the straights, but was in no way able to pass the Williams, while clearly being much faster in the corners.
I think PU modes are determined by engineers, not by drivers. If so, are you saying Alonso ignore his engineers and always use a more aggressive mapping than he´s told to?godlameroso wrote: ↑13 Jun 2017, 03:29Here's what I think, Alonso is just pushing everything, if it breaks it doesn't bother him because he's not even in the points. Understanding what fails can go a long way to making it better.
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
It's very likely as much utter nonsense as it sounds.
That's not what I was saying at least. Of course I'm not suggesting he is going rogue.Andres125sx wrote: ↑13 Jun 2017, 10:06I think PU modes are determined by engineers, not by drivers. If so, are you saying Alonso ignore his engineers and always use a more aggressive mapping than he´s told to?godlameroso wrote: ↑13 Jun 2017, 03:29Here's what I think, Alonso is just pushing everything, if it breaks it doesn't bother him because he's not even in the points. Understanding what fails can go a long way to making it better.