Yea...and Bottas car didnt exactly look great. Ferrari looked very strong until Q1, temps got upto 44C and that was it I think.F1Krof wrote: ↑13 Jun 2017, 23:14Or they upgraded their suspension resmebling more to what they were doing before Ferrari & Charlie spilled their milk before the season started when their tricky "active" yet "passive" suspension were banned.
The car looked very calm and precise all the way through.
Lets see if the trend continues like this.
Ferrari have looked strong in every FP3 session this season and it never transpires to be the true picture. Time you noticed the pattern.ferkan wrote: ↑14 Jun 2017, 00:19Yea...and Bottas car didnt exactly look great. Ferrari looked very strong until Q1, temps got upto 44C and that was it I think.F1Krof wrote: ↑13 Jun 2017, 23:14Or they upgraded their suspension resmebling more to what they were doing before Ferrari & Charlie spilled their milk before the season started when their tricky "active" yet "passive" suspension were banned.
The car looked very calm and precise all the way through.
Lets see if the trend continues like this.
Really? They looked shakey in Australia and Bahrain, and in both races their deficit in Q was larger then anywhere else. In Russia, China, Spain and Monaco they looked strong and in all of those there was very littled difference bewteen two teams.J0rd4n wrote: ↑14 Jun 2017, 04:22Ferrari have looked strong in every FP3 session this season and it never transpires to be the true picture. Time you noticed the pattern.ferkan wrote: ↑14 Jun 2017, 00:19Yea...and Bottas car didnt exactly look great. Ferrari looked very strong until Q1, temps got upto 44C and that was it I think.F1Krof wrote: ↑13 Jun 2017, 23:14Or they upgraded their suspension resmebling more to what they were doing before Ferrari & Charlie spilled their milk before the season started when their tricky "active" yet "passive" suspension were banned.
The car looked very calm and precise all the way through.
Lets see if the trend continues like this.
Huh???ferkan wrote: ↑14 Jun 2017, 18:05Really? They looked shakey in Australia and Bahrain, and in both races their deficit in Q was larger then anywhere else. In Russia, China, Spain and Monaco they looked strong and in all of those there was very littled difference bewteen two teams.
Maybe you ae talking about 2016 because it definitely doesnt apply to 2017.
7 tenths was an exaggerated gap due to the fact he failed to improve on his previous Q3 lap.ferkan wrote: ↑15 Jun 2017, 02:20Ok, but the point is, if Ferrari was 3-4 tenths faster then Merc in FP3s it would usually come down to a tenth of a difference or Ferrari slight advantage after Bahrain (in Spain Seb had engine that has done 5 races, surely he lost some time on it). Non the less, its not Ferraris FP3 form that is flattering, its more that Merc is conservative until Q3 where engine mods are running full pelt. But as I said, Ferraris advantage in FP3 in last few races meant tiny advantage in Q3. Here, it wasnt the case, that was my point.
It looked actually like Lewis car was only car really looking great on the track as he is in no way, shape or a form 7 tenths faster then Bottas over one lap.
Ok, my point was that Ferrari looked relatively similar in FP3 to how they looked ever since Bahrain, but gap between these on front row was much bigger then usual. It was observation that Lewis car handled much better then anyone else and that temps that spiked up alot in comparison to FP3 could also be to blame (given how close Bottas looked entire weekend).J0rd4n wrote: ↑15 Jun 2017, 02:257 tenths was an exaggerated gap due to the fact he failed to improve on his previous Q3 lap.ferkan wrote: ↑15 Jun 2017, 02:20Ok, but the point is, if Ferrari was 3-4 tenths faster then Merc in FP3s it would usually come down to a tenth of a difference or Ferrari slight advantage after Bahrain (in Spain Seb had engine that has done 5 races, surely he lost some time on it). Non the less, its not Ferraris FP3 form that is flattering, its more that Merc is conservative until Q3 where engine mods are running full pelt. But as I said, Ferraris advantage in FP3 in last few races meant tiny advantage in Q3. Here, it wasnt the case, that was my point.
It looked actually like Lewis car was only car really looking great on the track as he is in no way, shape or a form 7 tenths faster then Bottas over one lap.
My point is that Ferrari were looking no greater than they usually do before Q1... which has often failed to get them pole position.
This is even more interesting!Asked in an interview with the Daily Mail who the real ‘bad guy’ was in the three years of Mercedes’ utter domination which resulted in two titles for Lewis Hamilton (2014 and 2015) and one for Rosberg last year, Wolff revealed, “The one who is no longer here. The vicious one. Nico just tried to use all the weapons he had.”
“There were all the psycho games that you can play to destabilise your rival,” explained the Mercedes team principal, “With Nico and Lewis there may be factors we do not even know about.”
One of the more high profile salvos in the battle between the two was during qualifying for the 2014 Monaco Grand Prix where Rosberg was accused (by most of the F1 paddock) of deliberately botching his final lap to prevent Hamilton having a shot at pole.
Wolff was reminded of the the incident and asked for his opinion, “I have an answer but I am thinking how you would write it. It caused friction in the relationship. That was a big one.”
Let's say by the end of the season if Mercedes fixes their tyre issues and surge ahead, would Vettel be still happy to be at Ferrari? But then, would he be willing to go against Lewis in the same car?