Yes pleasegodlameroso wrote: ↑17 Aug 2017, 23:17Would you prefer a wall of text detailing harvesting and deployment algorithms, strategies, fuel delivery rates, pressure ratios, blowdown % vs electric super charging, differential entry and exit mapping, brake by wire strategies? Come on man, lighten up.
Yes, please!henry wrote: ↑17 Aug 2017, 23:36Yes pleasegodlameroso wrote: ↑17 Aug 2017, 23:17Would you prefer a wall of text detailing harvesting and deployment algorithms, strategies, fuel delivery rates, pressure ratios, blowdown % vs electric super charging, differential entry and exit mapping, brake by wire strategies? Come on man, lighten up.
You're really asking that on HERE?? Of course they would!!godlameroso wrote: ↑17 Aug 2017, 23:17Would you prefer a wall of text detailing harvesting and deployment algorithms, strategies, fuel delivery rates, pressure ratios, blowdown % vs electric super charging, differential entry and exit mapping, brake by wire strategies? Come on man, lighten up.
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
It's probably the MGU-H that's got a reliability upgrade, I'd guess McLaren expect Alonso has a chance of scoring points. So he keeps the old spec and Vandoorne gets to be the test mule given he's got a grid drop. Whichever part it is, sounds like Alonso will be getting it at the next race.godlameroso wrote: ↑24 Aug 2017, 16:08https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/mcla ... pa-944158/
Seems they're both getting updates, just Vandoorne is taking a whole new PU. There's one reliability component that Alonso isn't getting just yet. So apparently this is spec 3.5? 3.6 in Vandoorne's case.
Not sure if I should laugh or cry. Un-believable.The update is worth 0,1s according to Hasegawa
That is in absolute ratio, I think this update is also focus on readability, and with more readability comes more pace...