data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39ae2/39ae2f29de13e91858e3ed371269b09d2e1e9210" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Didn't run out. It just didn't deploy automatically. Pouhon was taken flat out and the engine map expected a throttle lift. There was no lift so it didn't know where it was on the track and didn't deploy.
Hahahahaha. Honda needs a separate software tester whose job is "Everybody else tests the software for the engine. You test this for Fernando Alonso"fellowhoodlums wrote: ↑26 Aug 2017, 19:23Didn't run out. It just didn't deploy automatically. Pouhon was taken flat out and the engine map expected a throttle lift. There was no lift so it didn't know where it was on the track and didn't deploy.
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/alon ... en-945396/
Andrew Benson (I know some might groan) has a bit more detail it seems. Software didn't pick up that Alonso had already gone through the corner so didn't deploy, so Alonso is too fast for the car and software it seems - https://twitter.com/andrewbensonf1/stat ... 0293412864
It's forbidden by the rules for safety reasons.Dipesh1995 wrote: ↑26 Aug 2017, 20:28Seems strange that their deployment strategy is not based or at least assisted with GPS data as well as major throttle position.
I don't think that ANY team has full deployment for the whole lap, the battiers allows for 33.3 seconds of hybrid boost at max power, and even with some amount of energy recovered while braking by the MGU-K and some on the straights by the MGU-H (I actually doubt it's much considering that it's in the highest possible power output mode) Spa has very long sections at full throttle.
This! Mostly throttle input.. there must be a better way to do this! Even a simple addition of a innertial navigations system would have helped i think.Dipesh1995 wrote: ↑26 Aug 2017, 20:28Seems strange that their deployment strategy is not based or at least assisted with GPS data as well as major throttle position.