i thought teams saved fuels when cars were running alone in the middle of the race? Why would they go into fuel saving mode in the second lap when everyone is bunched up and has DRS?
i thought teams saved fuels when cars were running alone in the middle of the race? Why would they go into fuel saving mode in the second lap when everyone is bunched up and has DRS?
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2017/08/27/n ... say-honda/Honda’s Yusuke Hasegawa says that the engine supplier could see ‘nothing in the data’ to indicate there was a problem with Fernando Alonso’s McLaren prior to his retirement.
After dropping gradually through the field during the Belgian Grand Prix, Alonso retired from the race on lap 26, complaining of an engine problem on his car.
Despite Alonso’s claims, Hasegawa says the decision was made to pull Alonso out of the race even though there was no indication of any problems in the team’s data.
For that to happen Renault has to brake contract with one of the teams are supplying, probably Toro Rosso and they are not gonna do it. So Renault deal is more and more away.
Please stop, they will resign Bottas quickly. Mercedes made it quite clear that Alonso won't join the team as long as Hamilton is there.Redragon wrote: ↑27 Aug 2017, 20:55For that to happen Renault has to brake contract with one of the teams are supplying, probably Toro Rosso and they are not gonna do it. So Renault deal is more and more away.
Mercedes sign still open as they haven't renewed Bottas, why are they waiting? Next week is September already when Alo will decide his future. I wouldn't be surprise they had a precontract on Christmas. Alo was the first one to be called rumours were saying, so why Mercedes would be interested on last Chistmas and not now? Also Lauda critisizing his salary etc... a kind of indirect message to drop the salary.
Probably he just parked car in garageetusch wrote: ↑27 Aug 2017, 20:27http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2017/08/27/n ... say-honda/Honda’s Yusuke Hasegawa says that the engine supplier could see ‘nothing in the data’ to indicate there was a problem with Fernando Alonso’s McLaren prior to his retirement.
After dropping gradually through the field during the Belgian Grand Prix, Alonso retired from the race on lap 26, complaining of an engine problem on his car.
Despite Alonso’s claims, Hasegawa says the decision was made to pull Alonso out of the race even though there was no indication of any problems in the team’s data.
I read quite a few posters saying that Alonso was right to stop the car due to his frustration (If that indeed is the case) and say there's a PU issue. However, Honda is also doing the right thing by calling out Alonso in public if there was nothing wrong. If Alonso has his way then Honda is out of F1 (What other team will use the current Honda PU?). They will not go out without a fight. I think this attack from Alonso on Honda may close even more doors with other manufacturers if he's not careful.F1NAC wrote: ↑27 Aug 2017, 21:45Probably he just parked car in garageetusch wrote: ↑27 Aug 2017, 20:27http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2017/08/27/n ... say-honda/Honda’s Yusuke Hasegawa says that the engine supplier could see ‘nothing in the data’ to indicate there was a problem with Fernando Alonso’s McLaren prior to his retirement.
After dropping gradually through the field during the Belgian Grand Prix, Alonso retired from the race on lap 26, complaining of an engine problem on his car.
Despite Alonso’s claims, Hasegawa says the decision was made to pull Alonso out of the race even though there was no indication of any problems in the team’s data.
https://i.imgur.com/2BQF88th.jpg
On his pole lap In china for example, hamilton did 328 kph on the start/finish straight and he did 329 kph on the back straight, which is 3 times the length. Very clearly they do not deploy at the same rates for those 2 stretches do they? There's only one reason why that would be the case and that is the fact they can't do it at max output over the whole lap.henry wrote: ↑27 Aug 2017, 18:11can I ask which of the numbers I used you disagree with? I think they have more than enough electrical energy to achieve full deployment for WOT over a full lap. I didn't include the charging they can do under part throttle which would provide even more energy.Juzh wrote: ↑27 Aug 2017, 11:21No on can deploy for entire lap at max power (120 kw) and wont be able to for as long as the rules stay as they are. It's very obvious they can't do it from how different acceleration is at different parts of tracks.henry wrote: ↑27 Aug 2017, 10:05I think Mercedes and Ferrari can run full MGU-K deployment for all of a qualy lap. It is likely that they don't but not because they don't have enough energy to deploy but more likely because they run part of the lap with wastegate open and the MGU-H driving the compressor.
Do you have some examples of the variation in acceleration rates?
Why? Until Bottas is signed it is open the possibitlityZakB wrote: ↑27 Aug 2017, 21:13Please stop, they will resign Bottas quickly. Mercedes made it quite clear that Alonso won't join the team as long as Hamilton is there.Redragon wrote: ↑27 Aug 2017, 20:55For that to happen Renault has to brake contract with one of the teams are supplying, probably Toro Rosso and they are not gonna do it. So Renault deal is more and more away.
Mercedes sign still open as they haven't renewed Bottas, why are they waiting? Next week is September already when Alo will decide his future. I wouldn't be surprise they had a precontract on Christmas. Alo was the first one to be called rumours were saying, so why Mercedes would be interested on last Chistmas and not now? Also Lauda critisizing his salary etc... a kind of indirect message to drop the salary.
Juzh wrote: ↑27 Aug 2017, 23:07On his pole lap In china for example, hamilton did 328 kph on the start/finish straight and he did 329 kph on the back straight, which is 3 times the length. Very clearly they do not deploy at the same rates for those 2 stretches do they? There's only one reason why that would be the case and that is the fact they can't do it at max output over the whole lap.henry wrote: ↑27 Aug 2017, 18:11can I ask which of the numbers I used you disagree with? I think they have more than enough electrical energy to achieve full deployment for WOT over a full lap. I didn't include the charging they can do under part throttle which would provide even more energy.
Do you have some examples of the variation in acceleration rates?
http://i.imgur.com/zvPWQqE.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/VYWjeuR.jpg
I also doubt it.A maximum of 4MJ per lap can be returned to the MGU-K and from there to the drivetrain - that’s ten times more than was possible with KERS, the ‘bolt-on’ recovery system ERS replaced in 2014. That means drivers have access to an additional 160bhp or so for approximately 33 seconds per lap.
Mercedes won't take Alonso while Hamilton is there. Alonso doesn't have a good name, he has a difficult personality. We like it, but the teams not so much. Mercedes don't want to create another Hamilton-Rosberg battle. Wolff also confirmed that the Bottas deal will be done quickly.Redragon wrote: ↑27 Aug 2017, 23:14Why? Until Bottas is signed it is open the possibitlityZakB wrote: ↑27 Aug 2017, 21:13Please stop, they will resign Bottas quickly. Mercedes made it quite clear that Alonso won't join the team as long as Hamilton is there.Redragon wrote: ↑27 Aug 2017, 20:55
For that to happen Renault has to brake contract with one of the teams are supplying, probably Toro Rosso and they are not gonna do it. So Renault deal is more and more away.
Mercedes sign still open as they haven't renewed Bottas, why are they waiting? Next week is September already when Alo will decide his future. I wouldn't be surprise they had a precontract on Christmas. Alo was the first one to be called rumours were saying, so why Mercedes would be interested on last Chistmas and not now? Also Lauda critisizing his salary etc... a kind of indirect message to drop the salary.
The technical regulations state that the PU is 100% controlled by the throttle. Article 5.6 is very clear, it's only about where the energy comes from!Zynerji wrote: ↑27 Aug 2017, 04:24I'm completely against GPS tuning to these items.
Hybrid deployment should be directly related to throttle deployment, not a track awareness via technology.
How is this kind of control scheme NOT considered a driver aid?
What would happen in reverse? What if it gave way too much in the wrong place?
The power deployment should be under the drivers control 100% of the time. Not a computer.
The Renaults were running a relatively high downforce set up. This would have slowed him on the straight, while giving a good tow to Alonso. And I am sure Alonso used every last J of battery power in that move. And he had a full battery, as it was just after the start. Hulkenberg was, probably, using a more normal engine mode.
Depends on the severity. I guess. The lap is long at spa.Sayeman wrote: ↑27 Aug 2017, 19:10i thought teams saved fuels when cars were running alone in the middle of the race? Why would they go into fuel saving mode in the second lap when everyone is bunched up and has DRS?