Again, if Hamilton was the defacto number one, they would have let him keep the place in order to help his personal title chances. The move to have Bottas let him by was in the hope that Hamilton would be able overtake one or both Ferraris and so improve the team's points haul. As this didn't happen, they reverted their drivers so that Bottas didn't lose out. This is not the action of a team favouring a number one driver.Chene_Mostert wrote: ↑07 Sep 2017, 13:49They were more than willing to sacrifice Bottas... If Lewis managed to get past Kimmi... Something they forgot about in their "act"Just_a_fan wrote: ↑07 Sep 2017, 13:45Hungary proves you wrong. If he had number one status, official or otherwise, he wouldn't have had to give the place back to Bottas.Chene_Mostert wrote: ↑07 Sep 2017, 10:43
Actually he does, but Nico would have none of it, hence the "friction".
For an example of a team favouring a number one driver, see Ferrari's action in the same race. Kimi was not allowed to pass Seb. The team favoured their defacto number one.
None of your accusations against Hamilton and Mercedes apply here. They do apply, however, to Vettel and Ferrari. Funny that.