Honda Power Unit Hardware & Software

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

They're limited by the regulations at 18:1, so I'd say they're still well short of that. If I had to guess I'd put it between 13.5:1 and 15:1 more in line with what's being used.
Saishū kōnā

63l8qrrfy6
63l8qrrfy6
368
Joined: 17 Feb 2016, 21:36

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

ziggy wrote:
28 Sep 2017, 20:49
While searching for some other things, I found this article, it's from RE. Maybe someone finds it interesting :wink:
The first prototype engine was run in the back of a development car at Mugello in September 2004, so the team could gather data on performance and the effects of the increased vibrations caused by a V8 on the surrounding systems. The engine development project team was run under Kazuo Sakurahara, who revealed to RE:
‘The most worrying problem would be a level of engine vibration which the design team had never experienced before.’
Honda RA806E

The vibration issue could potentially have lead to a range of problems that would keep both the engine and chassis design teams busy.
http://www.racecar-engineering.com/arti ... -revealed/

Back to my first search: anybody can enlighten me what the compression rates are in the current Honda engine? North of 18:1?
V8 vibrations took everyone by surprise. Cosworth CAs were shedding scavenge pumps and other ancilliaries left and right. They had to use multiphase bolts to keep them together.

Squid
Squid
3
Joined: 08 Jun 2017, 00:55

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

The Honda engine has a very distinctive rumbling sound when accelerating out of corners. Other engines sound much smoother. What could be causing this noise?

flexcon
flexcon
5
Joined: 08 Mar 2017, 09:18

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

Squid wrote:
29 Sep 2017, 09:56
The Honda engine has a very distinctive rumbling sound when accelerating out of corners. Other engines sound much smoother. What could be causing this noise?
I remember reading some replies that suggested in was either Cylinder cutting or the sound of the firing order.

I personally love the sound, almost like traction control era

User avatar
bigblue
24
Joined: 01 Oct 2014, 12:18

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

Mudflap wrote:
28 Sep 2017, 22:23
They had to use multiphase bolts to keep them together.
What's a multiphase bolt ?

User avatar
rscsr
51
Joined: 19 Feb 2012, 13:02
Location: Austria

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

bigblue wrote:
29 Sep 2017, 15:02
Mudflap wrote:
28 Sep 2017, 22:23
They had to use multiphase bolts to keep them together.
What's a multiphase bolt ?
It is a bolt, that kinda acts like a spring. Therefore vibrations can't loosen the bolts so easily.
I couldn't find the correct english Wikipedia, but here is the corresponding german Wikipedia: Dehnschraube

User avatar
Craigy
84
Joined: 10 Nov 2009, 10:20

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

bigblue wrote:
29 Sep 2017, 15:02
Mudflap wrote:
28 Sep 2017, 22:23
They had to use multiphase bolts to keep them together.
What's a multiphase bolt ?
It's a bolt made of a type of multi-phase steel. Google for "steel phase diagram".

The phase of steel is to do with the structure of the crystals and how they are joined together.

Edit: look at figure 3 here https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio ... rip_steels
Last edited by Craigy on 29 Sep 2017, 15:42, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Craigy
84
Joined: 10 Nov 2009, 10:20

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

Mudflap wrote:
28 Sep 2017, 22:23
ziggy wrote:
28 Sep 2017, 20:49
While searching for some other things, I found this article, it's from RE. Maybe someone finds it interesting :wink:
The first prototype engine was run in the back of a development car at Mugello in September 2004, so the team could gather data on performance and the effects of the increased vibrations caused by a V8 on the surrounding systems. The engine development project team was run under Kazuo Sakurahara, who revealed to RE:
‘The most worrying problem would be a level of engine vibration which the design team had never experienced before.’
Honda RA806E

The vibration issue could potentially have lead to a range of problems that would keep both the engine and chassis design teams busy.
http://www.racecar-engineering.com/arti ... -revealed/

Back to my first search: anybody can enlighten me what the compression rates are in the current Honda engine? North of 18:1?
V8 vibrations took everyone by surprise. Cosworth CAs were shedding scavenge pumps and other ancilliaries left and right. They had to use multiphase bolts to keep them together.
The Honda was particularly bad for vibration, especially in comparison to the comparable MB engine.

User avatar
Craigy
84
Joined: 10 Nov 2009, 10:20

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

rscsr wrote:
29 Sep 2017, 15:34
bigblue wrote:
29 Sep 2017, 15:02
Mudflap wrote:
28 Sep 2017, 22:23
They had to use multiphase bolts to keep them together.
What's a multiphase bolt ?
It is a bolt, that kinda acts like a spring. Therefore vibrations can't loosen the bolts so easily.
I couldn't find the correct english Wikipedia, but here is the corresponding german Wikipedia: Dehnschraube
If I understand the robotranslation from German into English, what you are describing is called a stretch bolt in English English, or commonly "torque to yield" in American English.

Stretch bolts are not made of multiphase steel - they are made of mild steel in my experience (Rover K-series).

ziggy
ziggy
11
Joined: 19 Nov 2012, 22:05

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

flexcon wrote:
29 Sep 2017, 11:10
Squid wrote:
29 Sep 2017, 09:56
The Honda engine has a very distinctive rumbling sound when accelerating out of corners. Other engines sound much smoother. What could be causing this noise?
I remember reading some replies that suggested in was either Cylinder cutting or the sound of the firing order.

I personally love the sound, almost like traction control era
From the article:
But perfecting the software to allow the advantages of HCCI principal at appropriate revs and loads, but switching to conventional ignition outside of those limits has proved feasible. The characteristic ‘misfire’ sound of the Honda on part throttle is believed to be the audible giveaway of the changeover point between the two modes.

The effect can also be heard – but less aggressively - on the Ferrari. With the Mercedes however, there is no aural evidence. It’s believed the Mercedes engine has featured this technology from the start in 2014, that it was also incorporated into Honda’s first engine last year and that Ferrari adopted the technology last year. Renault would this be the last of the four manufacturers to introduce it. Although details are sketchy at this point, it’s clear that this new technology has been a major part of the F1 power war in the hybrid turbo formula.
http://www.motorsportmagazine.com/opini ... wer-secret

User avatar
rscsr
51
Joined: 19 Feb 2012, 13:02
Location: Austria

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

Craigy wrote:
29 Sep 2017, 15:58
rscsr wrote:
29 Sep 2017, 15:34
bigblue wrote:
29 Sep 2017, 15:02

What's a multiphase bolt ?
It is a bolt, that kinda acts like a spring. Therefore vibrations can't loosen the bolts so easily.
I couldn't find the correct english Wikipedia, but here is the corresponding german Wikipedia: Dehnschraube
If I understand the robotranslation from German into English, what you are describing is called a stretch bolt in English English, or commonly "torque to yield" in American English.

Stretch bolts are not made of multiphase steel - they are made of mild steel in my experience (Rover K-series).
If that is really the case, than I don't know what the fuss is about. Normal bolts are available with strength class 12.9 (yield strength of 1 080 MPa) (for not even 0.5€ per bolt) usually in stock. And even up to 16.9 is standard.
I kinda would have been pretty surprised if they used anything less than grade 5 Titanium bolts, which have a better strength per weight than even the best steel bolts.
Therefore I kinda assumed that a multiphase bolt meant the construction and not the material.

User avatar
Craigy
84
Joined: 10 Nov 2009, 10:20

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

rscsr wrote:
29 Sep 2017, 17:26
Craigy wrote:
29 Sep 2017, 15:58
rscsr wrote:
29 Sep 2017, 15:34

It is a bolt, that kinda acts like a spring. Therefore vibrations can't loosen the bolts so easily.
I couldn't find the correct english Wikipedia, but here is the corresponding german Wikipedia: Dehnschraube
If I understand the robotranslation from German into English, what you are describing is called a stretch bolt in English English, or commonly "torque to yield" in American English.

Stretch bolts are not made of multiphase steel - they are made of mild steel in my experience (Rover K-series).
If that is really the case, than I don't know what the fuss is about. Normal bolts are available with strength class 12.9 (yield strength of 1 080 MPa) (for not even 0.5€ per bolt) usually in stock. And even up to 16.9 is standard.
I kinda would have been pretty surprised if they used anything less than grade 5 Titanium bolts, which have a better strength per weight than even the best steel bolts.
Therefore I kinda assumed that a multiphase bolt meant the construction and not the material.
I'm not sure what the regs were back in the days of the 2.4 Honda V8, but these days Ti is a banned material for fasteners on the PUs - they have to be alloys of iron/cobalt/nickel.
Ti is allowed on the chassis, but not the engine.

Tommy Cookers
Tommy Cookers
642
Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 16:55

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

tightening torque (friction) is a poor determiner of clamping load
torque-to-yield is a good determiner of clamping load

combined with a longer plastic range than the 'strongest' (highest UTS) materials can provide ? .....
a clamping load that is maintained throughout a high cyclic loading
even with a short bolt

still don't believe mild steel (eg stretch-to-yield as in Ford CVH)
a stronger material than MS but not heat treated to highest UTS ?

GoranF1
GoranF1
155
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 12:53
Location: Zagreb,Croatia

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

Spec 4 not introduced here because it "did not meet target"
"I have no idols. I admire work, dedication & competence."

User avatar
bigblue
24
Joined: 01 Oct 2014, 12:18

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

Saw this Japanese report at jp.motorsport.com on the autosport forum, posted by user Hasika. He, and the machine translated version of the report, says that Spec 4 is still under development, maybe available soon, but not yet reaching the desired power target.