HAHA yeah my crystal ball telling me thingsMcG wrote: ↑09 Oct 2017, 23:58Your post doesnt make sense. It reads like you are saying Honda won't make a good engine but then you say spec 4 will be magic, which is magic that you can tell the future.loner wrote: ↑09 Oct 2017, 16:47okey but if Fabrega know a future information iam sure ALO know about it as well
the delusional poster who think who believes Honda will produce a good PU is delusion well he is delusion because Mclaren is not going anywhere except the Williams route so i excuse him if he thinks Honda will remain noncompetitive, just 14 days for them to bite their fingers in massive bitterness while spec 4 perform in COTA.
Also the Williams comparison is old and too simple so don't go there.
Dude you make no sense. Both McLaren and Alonso have access to confidential information about Honda's plans for the future that you don't have. Both of them know what Honda is going to bring with spec 4. You don't. You are making baseless guesses with absolutely no information at hand. McLaren made a decision KNOWING WHAT SPEC 4 is. They made a decision knowing how Honda works. So stop this BS.loner wrote: ↑10 Oct 2017, 05:34HAHA yeah my crystal ball telling me thingsMcG wrote: ↑09 Oct 2017, 23:58Your post doesnt make sense. It reads like you are saying Honda won't make a good engine but then you say spec 4 will be magic, which is magic that you can tell the future.loner wrote: ↑09 Oct 2017, 16:47
okey but if Fabrega know a future information iam sure ALO know about it as well
the delusional poster who think who believes Honda will produce a good PU is delusion well he is delusion because Mclaren is not going anywhere except the Williams route so i excuse him if he thinks Honda will remain noncompetitive, just 14 days for them to bite their fingers in massive bitterness while spec 4 perform in COTA.
Also the Williams comparison is old and too simple so don't go there.
ALO care only for ALO he know there is huge upgrade coming in spec 4 its not magic from my side to know the future
there are many articles from several sources saying spec 4 is a major upgrade so anyway ALO will not sign new contract with Mclaren before evaluate the spec 4 if it really deliver he will give Mclaren the middle finger and sign with Honda true reason will be the massive wages but he will mask it with the power boost of spec 4.
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
Indeed.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑10 Oct 2017, 00:40The Renault PU aint looking too shabby in the races though... If they finally add a quali mode McLaren should be in the mix.
If Honda says spec 4 will bring 30-40 hp and this make us 3d powerful engine, what's McLaren's data? Do you think Honda show them their work and McLaren guys saw it's wrong, it won't bring power?
Few question that I expect answers to just the way I have asked them. i.e. Post the answers to each question in a numbered manner so I understand the rationale behind your statement.etusch wrote: ↑10 Oct 2017, 10:15If Honda says spec 4 will bring 30-40 hp and this make us 3d powerful engine, what's McLaren's data? Do you think Honda show them their work and McLaren guys saw it's wrong, it won't bring power?
No as you they just don't believe Honda can do that. All they know is a belief inside them
Anyone able to make such comparison with Verstappen or Riciardo?diffuser wrote: ↑09 Oct 2017, 15:53
I was looking at the S1 section of the video where they put Hamilton and Alonso's Best Quali lap side by side. Alonso looses a ton of time down the straight(ok, that was a given). In the exit of Turn 2 they both get on the throttle at the same time (Fly Emirates add on the far left). By the time they complete the exit of turn 2 Alonso is already 7KPH behind in speed). Hamilton gets to turn 3 at 259 and comes off the throttle slightly. Alonso, still only at 249, takes it flat out (having never reached Hamilton's speed). Alonso and Hamilton both come off the throttle and brake for the approach for turn 4.
Turn 5 and 6 are fairly even and speed not power limited. Hamilton goes into turn 7 5 KPH faster than Alonso as the Honda can't get the car up to 237KPH in the time out of turn 6 and into 7, not sure why Alonso did NOT stay full throttle in turn 7 to get his speed up. He does go full throttle much earlier than Hamilton out of turn 7. Almost catching Hamilton's speed exiting turn 7. Then Hamilton goes Full throttle and by the time he gets to the braking spot for turn 8 (little over 50 Meters) from the corner, he at 298 KPH and 15 KPH faster than Alonso.
1 I don’t know how powerfull spec 4. But I know hasegawa said we are planning to beat Renault. In my statement it is not important numbers but logic is important. Hasegawa said what I mentioned before divorce declared. So how you can assume that mclaren has data to show honda can’t be better or at least same level of Renault. What is your data or logic ? If hasegawa san says "I have numbers, we will beat renault before the end of the season", tell us which datas are mclaren looked and had a decision ?makecry wrote: ↑10 Oct 2017, 11:10
Few question that I expect answers to just the way I have asked them. i.e. Post the answers to each question in a numbered manner so I understand the rationale behind your statement.
1) How do you know Spec 4 will being 30-40 bhp? I haven't seen anyone from Honda make that comment so I am kinda confused about that number and what that source is.
2)How will 30-40bhp help exactly? Efficiency is the key. Cranking out 30-40bhp more is not going to help unless they can run that for a longer amount of time.
3)What do you think Honda and McLaren were? Coz as far as I know they are "PARTNERS".
They work together, they have access to each other's data. Anyone who says otherwise is talking out of his ass.
4)How many deadlines has Honda missed? How many times has Honda said,"The update didn't work as planned?" or "It's not ready yet"
5)What is this belief you talk about? You think McLaren would let go of $700mill over next 7 years based on their "belief"? What do you think is going on here? An elementary school project?
etusch wrote: ↑10 Oct 2017, 12:191)I don’t know how powerfull spec 4. But I know hasegawa said we are planning to beat Renault. In my statement it is not important numbers but logic is important. Hasegawa said what I mentioned before divorce declared. So how you can assume that mclaren has data to show honda can’t be better or at least same level of Renault. What is your data or logic ? If hasegawa san says "I have numbers, we will beat renault before the end of the season", tell us which datas are mclaren looked and had a decision ?makecry wrote: ↑10 Oct 2017, 11:10
Few question that I expect answers to just the way I have asked them. i.e. Post the answers to each question in a numbered manner so I understand the rationale behind your statement.
1) How do you know Spec 4 will being 30-40 bhp? I haven't seen anyone from Honda make that comment so I am kinda confused about that number and what that source is.
2)How will 30-40bhp help exactly? Efficiency is the key. Cranking out 30-40bhp more is not going to help unless they can run that for a longer amount of time.
3)What do you think Honda and McLaren were? Coz as far as I know they are "PARTNERS".
They work together, they have access to each other's data. Anyone who says otherwise is talking out of his ass.
4)How many deadlines has Honda missed? How many times has Honda said,"The update didn't work as planned?" or "It's not ready yet"
5)What is this belief you talk about? You think McLaren would let go of $700mill over next 7 years based on their "belief"? What do you think is going on here? An elementary school project?
2 I think this part no need to answer.
3 This is related number 1. There were partners but this not mean Honda or mclaren opened everything to each other. Where do you know they can reach each of data of other one?
4 Can you see difference start of season and now. Do you think all of that because of mcaren chassis?
5 Not me but you have to explain that how someone ( zak brown ) can say if they win next year we will look amateurish. If they are talking with data what that means ? If they made their decision what means “enough is enough” ?
You can bet they did! I think Honda had McLaren sign one too after that "GP2 engine!" outburst from Alonso. McLaren have complained about power but outright disrespect on the levels of RedBull did not happen in recent memory.
focus .. Hasegawa said the spec 4 will surpass Renault this is the so called confidential information you claimed thatmakecry wrote: ↑10 Oct 2017, 08:47Dude you make no sense. Both McLaren and Alonso have access to confidential information about Honda's plans for the future that you don't have. Both of them know what Honda is going to bring with spec 4. You don't. You are making baseless guesses with absolutely no information at hand. McLaren made a decision KNOWING WHAT SPEC 4 is. They made a decision knowing how Honda works. So stop this BS.
This is currently a fuel restricted formula, so anytime you increase power at max fuel flow you automatically increase efficiency.
Did Hasegawa actually state spec 4 would surpass Renault? I don't recall seeing this ever posted, all I recall is him saying they "hope" to surpass Renault by the end of the year, which are two very different things. They also "hoped" to be on the podium towards the end of the last two seasons & we all know how well that worked out. Until it actually happens or is specifically stated, we should not be going on "hope".loner wrote: ↑10 Oct 2017, 17:06
focus .. Hasegawa said the spec 4 will surpass Renault this is the so called confidential information you claimed that
Mclaren know but it seems they don't believe it,non of my business .. i believe Hasegawa end of the story.
COTA is the date (based on statement from Eric B and Fabrega ) w'll see who is right and who will be bitter.