you confuse win with
lose-lose-lose
Fair enough.KeiKo403 wrote: ↑16 Jan 2018, 15:41I never said anything about not liking Williams or any of the issue's are Lance's fault.wesley123 wrote: ↑16 Jan 2018, 15:17Of course, anything you don't like in Williams is because of Stroll. It couldn't possibly be that Williams made the choice themselves! I mean, who would pick a driver you can rely for the whole season over a driver who's performance is uncertain, consistency is uncertain and is completely unclear if he could even finish the season.
But Massa retired (again) because he wasn't going to be re-signed. They had all of those things in Massa so why not just re-sign him? Also recent history has proven that there are many drivers on the current/recent F1 grid who lack performance & consistency.
Red Bull has much more resources at its disposal to cope with such a situation than that Williams does. Also, Red Bulls position in the championship is much less competitive than that of Williams. Losing a tenth of pace can have serious consequences for Williams' championship position.Yes, very good point, however teams do swap drivers mid season....again recent history has shown this. And although extreme and admittedly a rare occurrence, you only need to look at the Verstappen/Kyvat swap May '16. I wouldn't say that turned out too badly.wesley123 wrote: ↑16 Jan 2018, 15:17Outside of that, in the tests with Williams that he did the headrest had to be modified, and it is fair to doubt Kubicas ability to get out of the car, with the halo, in the required time.
Consistency will be very important for Williams, and having to suddenly change their driver lineup in the middle of the season wouldn't be very good either.
I personally think Maldonado has the pace to win races, just not the racecraft. In the same way as I think Stroll has a bright future ahead of him. While he had a difficult season, I do think he grew incredibly and he certainly had his highlights over the course of the year. You wouldn't qualify 4th at a rain soaked Monza track if you didn't have any talent.It's a car & driver championship. Williams > Sauber, Stroll > Palmer. Also, even Maldonado won a race...
I do think that referring to Strolls money is overly harsh and completely ignores where it does matter; His ability. Everyone talks about his money, how he should have done x because of this money, but everyone forgets -or simply chooses to ignore- that Lance had a really successsful career prior to his F1 debut.I'm not knocking Lance, everyone needs to start somewhere. Although IMO Williams is nothing more than an investment in Lances' future by his father. A playground if you like, somewhere to build experience and confidence. I suspect he wouldn't get the confidence if Kubica would start beating him.wesley123 wrote: ↑16 Jan 2018, 15:172. Who cares if Lance would get beaten to begin with? 2017 showed very well that Lance still is learning, and it is fairly reasonable to assume that Lance would still learn things through the 2018 season. Anyone who would expect, or require him to beat an experienced teammate is being completely unreasonable.
3. This argument makes me sad that it isn't Kubica next to Stroll, because if Stroll would completely destroy Kubica, that would have been really funny. But on the other hand, Kubica not getting the seat and all the people getting mad about it is pretty funny as well.
I wish that people would take a honest look at the driver lineup instead of blaming anything they don't like on Stroll.
Couldn't have put it better myself, If I could upvote it 20 times, I would!
Sebastian Bourdais did EXACTLY that! 4th, Monza, rain soaked. and he in F1 terms didn't have any talent.
Also one race proves very little pastor Maldonado has won a race while i don't see him being classed as better than hulk, heifield or even someone like kobiashi
Sad for Robert, but not surprised at all. There is little sentiment in business. Now to see how Sirotkin performs relative to Stroll.Fulcrum wrote: ↑12 Dec 2017, 15:01I'm not surprised at all.
"How fast is Robert capable of driving?"
The longer this drags on, the more it favours Sirotkin.
I know there is a lot of sentiment within the forum and wider community for Robert, but if Sirotkin is simply faster (with significantly less testing time I might add), and brings more money, then the decision is an absolute no-brainer.
because of chandhok's comments, somebody who managed to turn an already slow hrt in almost time travelling slow?Sevach wrote: ↑17 Jan 2018, 14:17https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/kubi ... ok-996580/
Chandok's thoughts on the matter.
Clear at this point that Kubica didn't set the world on fire on the tests he did.
He's a Williams employee so i assume he is speaking with inside knowledge of how the tests went, and how the guys in the garage reacted to it.Manoah2u wrote: ↑18 Jan 2018, 01:14because of chandhok's comments, somebody who managed to turn an already slow hrt in almost time travelling slow?Sevach wrote: ↑17 Jan 2018, 14:17https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/kubi ... ok-996580/
Chandok's thoughts on the matter.
Clear at this point that Kubica didn't set the world on fire on the tests he did.
sorry but he's one of the last people in F1 that i'd take really serious.
.9s behind his teammate though, who qualified on pole(and won the race). Compared to the example I gave, where Stroll was 1.2s ahead of his teammate who qualified 9th. Also Stroll was 3 points behind his teammate in the season standings, compared to Bourdais being 31 points behind.NathanOlder wrote: ↑16 Jan 2018, 21:47Sebastian Bourdais did EXACTLY that! 4th, Monza, rain soaked. and he in F1 terms didn't have any talent.