Honda Power Unit Hardware & Software

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

Does this mean different lift and duration for each intake and exhaust valve? Are these head channels supposed to act as variable ports? That's very clever, I'm impressed if so.
Saishū kōnā

roon
roon
412
Joined: 17 Dec 2016, 19:04

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

godlameroso wrote:
21 Jan 2018, 00:56
Does this mean different lift and duration for each intake and exhaust valve? Are these head channels supposed to act as variable ports? That's very clever, I'm impressed if so.
Yeah, might be a reference to asymmetrical camshaft lobes. I'm not sure what this would have to do with "complex" ports, though.

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

roon wrote:
21 Jan 2018, 01:43
godlameroso wrote:
21 Jan 2018, 00:56
Does this mean different lift and duration for each intake and exhaust valve? Are these head channels supposed to act as variable ports? That's very clever, I'm impressed if so.
Yeah, might be a reference to asymmetrical camshaft lobes. I'm not sure what this would have to do with "complex" ports, though.
Since there's no variable cam timing or lift then with unique cam profiles and variable ports maybe you could get the effect indirectly.
Saishū kōnā

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
565
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

roon wrote:
21 Jan 2018, 01:43
godlameroso wrote:
21 Jan 2018, 00:56
Does this mean different lift and duration for each intake and exhaust valve? Are these head channels supposed to act as variable ports? That's very clever, I'm impressed if so.
Yeah, might be a reference to asymmetrical camshaft lobes. I'm not sure what this would have to do with "complex" ports, though.
I think he means the axis and movement of the valves is not perpendicular to the axis of the camshaft and also not paralell to its sister valve.
In other words, the valves are splayed out wide to give some sort of desired flow pattern into the cylinders. Special cam followers would need to be used if this is true and the cylinder head would indeed be slightly taller maybe 1cm taller...?
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

Racing Green in 2028

63l8qrrfy6
63l8qrrfy6
368
Joined: 17 Feb 2016, 21:36

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

PlatinumZealot wrote:
21 Jan 2018, 16:48
roon wrote:
21 Jan 2018, 01:43
godlameroso wrote:
21 Jan 2018, 00:56
Does this mean different lift and duration for each intake and exhaust valve? Are these head channels supposed to act as variable ports? That's very clever, I'm impressed if so.
Yeah, might be a reference to asymmetrical camshaft lobes. I'm not sure what this would have to do with "complex" ports, though.
I think he means the axis and movement of the valves is not perpendicular to the axis of the camshaft and also not paralell to its sister valve.
In other words, the valves are splayed out wide to give some sort of desired flow pattern into the cylinders. Special cam followers would need to be used if this is true and the cylinder head would indeed be slightly taller maybe 1cm taller...?
Correct - the pad on the finger follower is ground with a '3D' surface profile to maintain the desired contact with the valve end. They've been doing this ever since compound angles became the norm.

63l8qrrfy6
63l8qrrfy6
368
Joined: 17 Feb 2016, 21:36

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

Wazari wrote:
20 Jan 2018, 22:45
"Tanol" = butanol.
Oil tank issue was attributed to shape, PU location and mounting angles. This led to intermittent cavitation causing air to go into the supply line for the MGU-H. Slosh dynamics is very difficult to mimic.
Camshaft design is part witchcraft and voodoo. This version of camshaft is slightly unique due to a very complex intake and exhaust passages in the cylinder head. One reason for a slightly taller and heavier head. Point to ponder: think BMW motorcycle engine camshafts.
I hear dyno testing to date is no comparison to same time last year. Both in terms of power and reliability.
Would the main/big end bearings not have failed first? Or is there a split oil circuit with multiple oil pumps ?

Normally cavitation on its own doesn't cause air in the oil system as vapor bubbles collapse very fast.

User avatar
Wouter
114
Joined: 16 Dec 2017, 13:02

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

Wazari wrote:
20 Jan 2018, 22:45

I hear dyno testing to date is no comparison to same time last year. Both in terms of power and reliability.
That was also the situation in Abu Dhabi. I was hoping anyone could tell me if they made progress during this wintertime in terms of power and reliability. Nevertheless thank you for answer Wazari.

OO7
OO7
171
Joined: 06 Apr 2010, 17:49

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

godlameroso wrote:
21 Jan 2018, 05:04
Since there's no variable cam timing or lift then with unique cam profiles and variable ports maybe you could get the effect indirectly.
Sounds expensive.

User avatar
carisi2k
28
Joined: 15 Oct 2014, 23:26

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

Is that dyno testing good power and reliability wazari or not so good and what about economy? Will the Honda be using less fuel to go with this extra power and reliability?

hurril
hurril
54
Joined: 07 Oct 2014, 13:02

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

Dear Mr. Wazari,

if you could change something (or a few things) in the PU rules, what would it (or they) be? Freevalves? Port injector too? Two turbos?

Nonserviam85
Nonserviam85
6
Joined: 17 May 2013, 11:21

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

Wazari wrote:
20 Jan 2018, 22:45
Point to ponder: think BMW motorcycle engine camshafts.
Wazari, do you refer to the 1200cc boxer camshafts? The ones with the conical profile and ~20deg valve angle?

Lucky
Lucky
157
Joined: 15 Feb 2014, 09:23

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

Already the opening specification power unit in 2018 has almost completed the specification and it should not think that results will come out soon. Asaki himself said "I want time and I want about half a year."
:lol: :lol: :lol:
https://translate.google.it/translate?s ... t=&act=url

Snorked
Snorked
71
Joined: 16 Mar 2015, 21:00

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

We need a proper translation; is the author of the article saying the opening spec of the engine (which was Hasegawa's ?) is almost complete and won't see the results of Asaki's input, who says he needs 4, 5 or 6 months to implement it?


A new issue of that F1 Sokuho magazine releases on the 25th so maybe we'll get a full interview with the new Honda staff as that photo looks like some press junket setup.

User avatar
dmjunqueira
21
Joined: 12 Nov 2013, 20:55
Location: Brazil

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

Nonserviam85 wrote:
22 Jan 2018, 14:34
Wazari wrote:
20 Jan 2018, 22:45
Point to ponder: think BMW motorcycle engine camshafts.
Wazari, do you refer to the 1200cc boxer camshafts? The ones with the conical profile and ~20deg valve angle?
http://articles.sae.org/8444/
Image

roon
roon
412
Joined: 17 Dec 2016, 19:04

Re: Honda Power Unit

Post

Conical lobes aren't unique to BMW. Look at Brian.G's threads on this forum. I'm not sure this is the valve detail he's referring to.

BMW had asymmetrical cam lobes at one time. Asymmetrical in the sense of timing i.e. indexing of the lobe apexes relative to each other. However, this may also not be unique to BMW.

Image

Image

Keep in mind the "complex" runner reference. It could be that, due to runner shape, a follower or rocker is used on one of the valves which contacts the camshaft at an atypical location i.e. not beneath the camshaft, but at the side or top. If there was no space available directly beneath the camshaft for a traditional bucket and spring arrangement, due to runner shape, such components could be relocated to the side of, or on top of, the camshaft. This would require 'asymmetrical' or out-of-phase lobes.

Another interpretation may be rocker arms, generally. Both valves operated by rockers; no asymmetry. BMW have used cam operated rockers on motorcycle heads before. Again, not unique to them.

Image

Image

Image

This potentially frees up space underneath the camshafts and can permit greater valve inclination angles. There is precedent elsewhere:

Image

Image

hurril wrote:
13 Jan 2018, 14:01
amho wrote:
12 Jan 2018, 21:23
hurril wrote:
12 Jan 2018, 09:15
Injectors on the exhaust side is nothing strange. The injector merely sits on the cylinderbank together with the exhaust valves instead of with the intake valves.
I always thought that the injector is placed in the top of prechamber, but If injector is in exhaust side (as motor fan pic. indicates) how do they have rich mixture in the prechamber? there might be multiple injection first one when piston is near tdc to mainly fill prechamber?
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1tpCUl ... SY3ZJV5gNa
I know, right? I've wondered that from the start and the only thing that seems possible is for the injector to create a denser cloud close to the holes in the pre-chamber and then hope that enough of it gets sucked/ pushed in there by the compression. (The pressure gradient is evened out/ lowered so that it is equal on both sides of the "membrane" that the holes form, thereby pulling the fuel with it.)

There seem to be so many concurrently active factors that go in to this though and it's not that easy to form a working picture of all of them I think.
The piston crown could either partially form the prechamber or contain an internal passage that aligns with the injector at TDC. Either way, the injector would spray into the piston/combustion chamber prior to TDC. At and near TDC, the piston geometry ensures that only a small volume is available for the injector to spray into: the prechamber.
Last edited by roon on 22 Jan 2018, 20:32, edited 4 times in total.