I'm sure this would help with the homogeneous mixing to fill the pre-chamber.roon wrote: ↑22 Jan 2018, 23:40If each runner (per-cylinder) is individually throttled as part of a VIM system, then you could indeed effectively have variable flow properties without variable valve timing. Call it variable flow timing. One valve can actuate earlier than another via asymmetrical cam lobe phasing. The throttles would be used preference flow into one runner or the other, which in turn determines when the bulk of the intake flow enters the cylinder.
To eliminate flow restriction trade-offs, you oversize the runners. Which might explain a taller head.
Any indication (that you can share) as to how the baseline engine compares to the end of season 617?Wazari wrote: ↑22 Jan 2018, 22:24Yes I meant the "boxer" engine camshafts. Some of you are spot on on your assumptions.
I hear that dyno testing is going well in terms of reliability and efficiency. After accomplishing those targets comes power. The baseline for the 618 is done and running. They are many more innovations in the pipeline which I highly doubt the other manufacturers will have in 2018 or ever for that matter, that Honda will try and fully incorporate by mid-season.
I would like to see the fuel flow limit go away and allow refueling during a race. This is racing....????
This quote fascinates me. That's a super confident claim, especially while they are still trying to reach a strong baseline, but I never underestimate the Japanese, especially a company as large as this with as much pressure that's in been faced with. I'm hoping for an enormous reaction! I'm very excited to see what Honda pulls out of the hat this yearWazari wrote: ↑22 Jan 2018, 22:24Yes I meant the "boxer" engine camshafts. Some of you are spot on on your assumptions.
I hear that dyno testing is going well in terms of reliability and efficiency. After accomplishing those targets comes power. The baseline for the 618 is done and running. They are many more innovations in the pipeline which I highly doubt the other manufacturers will have in 2018 or ever for that matter, that Honda will try and fully incorporate by mid-season.
I would like to see the fuel flow limit go away and allow refueling during a race. This is racing....????
I had initially understood this as a very pesimistic statement.GhostF1 wrote: ↑26 Jan 2018, 02:40This quote fascinates me. That's a super confident claim, especially while they are still trying to reach a strong baseline, but I never underestimate the Japanese, especially a company as large as this with as much pressure that's in been faced with. I'm hoping for an enormous reaction! I'm very excited to see what Honda pulls out of the hat this yearWazari wrote: ↑22 Jan 2018, 22:24Yes I meant the "boxer" engine camshafts. Some of you are spot on on your assumptions.
I hear that dyno testing is going well in terms of reliability and efficiency. After accomplishing those targets comes power. The baseline for the 618 is done and running. They are many more innovations in the pipeline which I highly doubt the other manufacturers will have in 2018 or ever for that matter, that Honda will try and fully incorporate by mid-season.
I would like to see the fuel flow limit go away and allow refueling during a race. This is racing....????.
That seems to me very good news Wazari, thanks.Wazari wrote: ↑22 Jan 2018, 22:24
I hear that dyno testing is going well in terms of reliability and efficiency. After accomplishing those targets comes power. The baseline for the 618 is done and running. They are many more innovations in the pipeline which I highly doubt the other manufacturers will have in 2018 or ever for that matter, that Honda will try and fully incorporate by mid-season.
Or efficiency improved, but power stayed level, so fueling for the race can be decreased which improves lap times. Mercedes caries significantly less fuel than the other three.
Well, not really. Peak power comes as a function of efficiency of the PU which I know that you know of course. I don't think repeating that is particularly conducive to understanding what's going on here though. Reducing losses in the ERS won't show on a peak power graph but will cut the lap times.godlameroso wrote: ↑26 Jan 2018, 16:43Efficiency = power. It means achieving the same with less, so if you use the same you achieve more(over a fixed number of laps)
Power is a function of force over time.
Agreed, godlamerso.