There you go again telling everyone else what they are thinking.
Probably should substitute them for some of those hot new swedish 5 axis CNC's. Hot!
Right and I do not want to ban tittybars either. I am not against escort girls nor prostitution in general. I don't judge women that choose any of that. This is what some of you seem to fail to understand.Restomaniac wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 12:55have voted with my wallet as you put it. However I wouldn't want them banned because my opinion shouldn't effect others. A lesson you could maybe learn.
Oh BTW those women are not half naked. They are wearing no more or less than you will see being warn by women walking down the street in the middle of summer.
The irony is that the problem is with you. It's YOU who is connecting women wearing no less than what models wear with tittybars. It's YOU who is connecting women wearing what in any other walk would be summer clothes as being 'half naked'.
Do you see the "I think" at the beginning of that sentence? I highlighted it for you.
You're doing it again. Why are you connecting women wearing clothes that wouldn't make anyone look twice on any street with escort girls? That's all on YOU, I think you many need to go and seek help.hurril wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 13:00Right and I do not want to ban tittybars either. I am not against escort girls nor prostitution in general. I don't judge women that choose any of that. This is what some of you seem to fail to understand.Restomaniac wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 12:55have voted with my wallet as you put it. However I wouldn't want them banned because my opinion shouldn't effect others. A lesson you could maybe learn.
Oh BTW those women are not half naked. They are wearing no more or less than you will see being warn by women walking down the street in the middle of summer.
The irony is that the problem is with you. It's YOU who is connecting women wearing no less than what models wear with tittybars. It's YOU who is connecting women wearing what in any other walk would be summer clothes as being 'half naked'.
The problem I have is with using escort girls to sell me motor sport. That is degrading _against me_. "You are a man that likes motorsport. Quick: take a look at these tits." WTF?!
Exactly, thus making out that others think differently.hurril wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 13:01Do you see the "I think" at the beginning of that sentence? I highlighted it for you.Restomaniac wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 12:57There you go again telling everyone else what they are thinking.
So we should ban or disallow pretty much any advertisements where attractive women (and men too) are used as "objects". Fashion magazines? Models? Those poor women.hurril wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 12:43If you cannot see that the women are there because of their looks and not any function at all, thus: their role is to be desired. As objects. I am _against_ this. So, of the guys bickering in here, on the one hand you have guys that _want_ to consume women as objects and you have me. I do not wish to see women as objects in this fashion here.
Yes we should be nailing fashion houses to the Wall too. I mean if the grid girls outfits are now discribed as stuff escort girls wear then so are many outfits bought in the shops. How dare they be allowed to walk the streets in such a manner, have they no shame? Don't they realise that them not having a choice in the matter is being done for their own good in the name of equality?Phil wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 13:12So we should ban or disallow pretty much any advertisements where attractive women (and men too) are used as "objects". Fashion magazines? Models? Those poor women.hurril wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 12:43If you cannot see that the women are there because of their looks and not any function at all, thus: their role is to be desired. As objects. I am _against_ this. So, of the guys bickering in here, on the one hand you have guys that _want_ to consume women as objects and you have me. I do not wish to see women as objects in this fashion here.
Next, we should possibly ban sexy outfits too, period. What's the point, it just makes us (men) perceive them as objects. How dare we allow such a thing to happen!
I would happily agree with the point about having men and women doing this job.Sieper wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 13:20I spent my upvotes today on Hurril, glad to read on open minded and respectful opinion, even if others choose to disagree with that viewpoint.
We all like to see an elegant women (or at least I do) but if there was nothing wrong on why we see this in our world, where are the gridboys? Where is the boybeauty 2018 contest lower Missouri (starting with age class 4?) where are the thousands of stories of boys and young men being sexually intimidated or even being raped by succesfull businesswomen, entertainment stars, movie stars etc? (yes the catholic church goes some way to "rectify" that (but only because priest may not touch women, and are "devout") Where is the first female president of the US that jokingly can state "grab em by the dick" and still remain in office?
Maybe we actually do still have a the problem of inequity between men and women and from that viewpoint it is not such a bad idea to do some symbolic action in one of the worlds largest sports/glamour shows (F1).
Looks like you're the one with the problem if you insist on objectifying women to that degree. I've never thought of the Grid Girls in those terms at all. Do you have a problem with fashion models by any chance? Is that degrading against you too that an aesthetically pleasing person is gainfully employed doing something they have chosen to do?
Yes 100% correct but you wont get that message through to a bunch of fools.
like i said, I thought it was for the drivers to find their grid spots in the crowd of people.bonjon1979 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 12:51Please, someone say it's so people in the crowd can know which car is which. They hold their boards facing towards the start line. Hardly anyone can see what's on the boards as they're viewed from the side. We all understand which car is which on the grid and the teams know where their cars line up.