16:04 I'm watching down at Turn 9, and the Mercedes looks absolutely immense through here. Despite obviously carrying more fuel on board, the car looks really fast - Bottas has the tiniest of lifts of the throttle.
It’s nice to finally see Alonso on track and true to form he’s not short of commitment. He tried to go into Turn 9 flat but the car won’t take it and he has to have a quick lift near the apex to avoid running out of road.
Karun Chandhok
So its basically the same statment, one praising Mercedes and the other criticizing Mclaren?mclaren111 wrote: ↑09 Mar 2018, 16:12Autosport:
16:04 I'm watching down at Turn 9, and the Mercedes looks absolutely immense through here. Despite obviously carrying more fuel on board, the car looks really fast - Bottas has the tiniest of lifts of the throttle.
It’s nice to finally see Alonso on track and true to form he’s not short of commitment. He tried to go into Turn 9 flat but the car won’t take it and he has to have a quick lift near the apex to avoid running out of road.
Karun Chandhok
Well Mercedes has been running more so the car has better setting, Alonso to be fair has been running 20 laps so far this afternoon. So the comments are a bit relevantDFX wrote: ↑09 Mar 2018, 16:16So its basically the same statment, one praising Mercedes and the other criticizing Mclaren?mclaren111 wrote: ↑09 Mar 2018, 16:12Autosport:
16:04 I'm watching down at Turn 9, and the Mercedes looks absolutely immense through here. Despite obviously carrying more fuel on board, the car looks really fast - Bottas has the tiniest of lifts of the throttle.
It’s nice to finally see Alonso on track and true to form he’s not short of commitment. He tried to go into Turn 9 flat but the car won’t take it and he has to have a quick lift near the apex to avoid running out of road.
Karun Chandhok
Vandoorne's number , so at least yesterday's news !
Unfortunately this is the case. We have to remind ourselves that changing to Renault seemed like the only choice to make because the Honda was even worse than Renault.
You can't just make a statement in the beginning that the following will be nonsense and fantasy. Either post the first statement with nothing following it or post what you are going to post and we will know that's what YOU think, rather than having a lame disclaimer that you really don't have a clue.Redragon wrote: ↑03 Mar 2018, 21:06Man can you read?McG wrote: ↑03 Mar 2018, 18:15You're giving Renault a lot of positivity. Why not Williams with its first full Paddy Lowe car or Force India the Mercedes B team with 2 great drivers. Red Bull could get it wrong and Ferrari could be ahead of Mercedes. NO ONE KNOWS AND YOU ARE JUST GUESSING.Redragon wrote: ↑03 Mar 2018, 04:49Well obviously is just the first test and final conclusions can't be made but I don't think @GoranF1 is far from reality
So far it is what we all knew or expected 1. Mercedes 2. Ferrari 3. Redbull 4 or 5 Renault or Mclaren.
It looks like the 4th would be depending on what Renault is gonna do to determining if Mclaren is 4th or 5th
By reading Sky analysis, BBC and other main media from the first week all coincide around the same terms.
So it is not to crazy to say Mclaren is 5th at this stage
It's just all very daft guessing after that test.
McG wrote: ↑09 Mar 2018, 17:12Unfortunately this is the case. We have to remind ourselves that changing to Renault seemed like the only choice to make because the Honda was even worse than Renault.
Now it's looking like Honda have really got their act together (correct me if I'm wrong). And Renault haven't improved have they?
I would like to give McLaren the benefit of the doubt about the failures, but I suspect Podromu just like Newey is pushing the packaging over the limit.
What plan should they have? That's much better than last years. A plan to come on top after this years would be ridiculously bad.Ground Effect wrote: ↑09 Mar 2018, 17:28According to Sky, Mclaren believe they're in the middle of the packwas that the plan?