"I love wet races, unless it was a race I expected my driver/team to win."
No offense, but why call it a masterclass as he in both years had the best car on the grid?PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑19 Mar 2018, 14:35Another Hamilton wet weather masterclass. revenge for 2014 and 2010. Never forget!!
His team mates too!epo wrote: ↑19 Mar 2018, 14:39No offense, but why call it a masterclass as he in both years had the best car on the grid?PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑19 Mar 2018, 14:35Another Hamilton wet weather masterclass. revenge for 2014 and 2010. Never forget!!
wet race would be awesome for the start of the season
One of the few times I've seen him slow in the wet. Was very odd.GPR-A wrote: ↑19 Mar 2018, 15:04His team mates too!epo wrote: ↑19 Mar 2018, 14:39No offense, but why call it a masterclass as he in both years had the best car on the grid?PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑19 Mar 2018, 14:35Another Hamilton wet weather masterclass. revenge for 2014 and 2010. Never forget!!
In 2010, he qualified 11th and his team mate qualified 4th, 3 tenth behind the pole sitter. That's how best the car was!
They wouldn't bother going out, first race or not, installation plus a couple of sighters is all you'd get. For you to see DF comparison potential with nullified PU differences is during a critical competitive session, qually or race. But even then, wet maps for the engine must play a huge part?atanatizante wrote: ↑19 Mar 2018, 18:10If we`ll have a wet track on FP1/FP2 that means PU influence is less important hence we could see which car has the biggest DF out there ... looking forward to seeing that ...