It is not to defend Mr. Dietrich. But he is a businessman, not an engineer. If the rumors are true and Honda is 10HP below Renault, then they are almost the same.
I only guess..
I think gap is more than 10hp. When we think 6 kg weight advantage of Honda PU (we don't know if they have cog advantage still. If lower cog is still there too, we can say Honda is already ahead of renault as performance ) 10 hp is not make renault better than Honda.
aiming Renault becoming very boring .. there is some one cruising for wins ...techman wrote: ↑21 Mar 2018, 22:02I am not suprise that the main guy says honda is equal to renault. they have a full runnin car dyno and they can see the figures. hasegawa mentioned about being close to renault and said that their spec 4 will overtake renault. so no suprise. hope they go beyond renault at least another 20 by end of the year
I'm going with Mateschitz since the STR13 was faster then any Renault powered car in a straight by nearly 2km/h (333.2 STR13 vs 331.2 RB14). If as suspected by some those numbers are draft assisted then the normal top speeds show the STR13 right up their with the top Renault's although I am not sure if carlos sainz 325km/h top speed was normal or assisted.
carisi2k wrote: ↑22 Mar 2018, 00:22I'm going with Mateschitz since the STR13 was faster then any Renault powered car in a straight by nearly 2km/h (333.2 STR13 vs 331.2 RB14). If as suspected by some those numbers are draft assisted then the normal top speeds show the STR13 right up their with the top Renault's although I am not sure if carlos sainz 325km/h top speed was normal or assisted.
No doubt the STR chassis isn't in the same class as the Red Bull but it should easily be able to keep pace with Renault and thrash Mclaren who look like they will be blowing up left right and centre during the first half of the year with there package.
Anyway I am so looking forward to the weekend.
High top speed only means something if its accompanied with fast lap times. If you see high top speed but average to slow lap times that means its setup related.(downforce-drag levels).carisi2k wrote: ↑22 Mar 2018, 00:22I'm going with Mateschitz since the STR13 was faster then any Renault powered car in a straight by nearly 2km/h (333.2 STR13 vs 331.2 RB14). If as suspected by some those numbers are draft assisted then the normal top speeds show the STR13 right up their with the top Renault's although I am not sure if carlos sainz 325km/h top speed was normal or assisted.
No doubt the STR chassis isn't in the same class as the Red Bull but it should easily be able to keep pace with Renault and thrash Mclaren who look like they will be blowing up left right and centre during the first half of the year with there package.
Anyway I am so looking forward to the weekend.
https://grandpx.news/news/honda-will-ca ... marko/amp/the EDGE wrote: ↑21 Mar 2018, 17:01Point well made, and notedivanlesk wrote: ↑21 Mar 2018, 16:23https://www.thisisf1.com/2018/02/19/hel ... r-2019-f1/
19.02.2018
So when i said that Marko changed his mind you thought what? That i read i same interview two things?
If you haven't read something it doesn't mean that it didn't happen.
So have you got the link for Marko saying the end of the season too? I’d be interested in reading that so I was all caught up with the latest development
https://headlines.yahoo.co.jp/hl?a=2018 ... 2-rcg-moto
The Toro rosso was not doing slow lap times. It was running relatively close to Renault and Hass in lap times who are purported to be the number 4 and 5 teams after the big 3. Similar top speeds and lap times to Renault means that dismissing Toro Rosso as running with low downforce is 100% wrong. As you said above Barcelona is a high downforce circuit and if they were running low downforce to achieve a higher top speed it would have shown in lap times.Bisonas wrote: ↑22 Mar 2018, 00:59
High top speed only means something if its accompanied with fast lap times. If you see high top speed but average to slow lap times that means its setup related.(downforce-drag levels).
Since we don't know the actual lap time accomplished when that top speed was registered and taking into account that Torro Rosso didn't made any spectacular lap times, well i would suggest do not be carried away from those numbers. Don't forget that @ Barcelona its well known that highest top speeds doesn't produce the fastest lap time. You have to add some more downforce if you are going to be really fast there, thus reducing your top speed.
If you ask me, i believe Honda will equal Renault at mid or end of season, But Torro Rosso chassis will never equal Renaults or Mclarens chassis this year. That's my Opinion.
Just out of curiosity, why would you remove Fernando's time, and what makes it anomalous?