AP, quoting Marco Andretti wrote:If you ask me, it was sabotage. It was.
They wanted him to fail. I don't know, it was a very bad deal. The reality of it was, they had Mika Hakkinen ready to come in for a lot less than what my dad was getting paid, and that's all it was. Right then and there, they had to make him look (bad).
They would make the car do weird things in the corner electronically, stuff out of his control.
And I think my dad's biggest supporter over there was Ayrton Senna. Because he was one of the few who knew what was really happening in the team, and I think he believed in my father. It was at Monza that he really said, 'Give him my car. Give him exactly what I had.'
...
I don't have any other mentality other than to go over there and win. Because I think it's a bigger story if I go over there and fail, really. It really is. Because that's what people are waiting for, to be honest, over there.
The reason it's tough right now is, if I go win Kentucky, Ferrari's not going to come say, 'Hey, we want you'. But maybe (winning) a series championship and the Indy 500, that could help.
Oh boy, Marco going on
record with this stuff was somewhat of a shocker. It seems he's surprisingly oblivious, as a person with a stated desire to try out F1, to some very basic realities therein. From what he's saying, Michael went to McLaren already believing that the sport was political and it'd ruin everything; did he even understand that in his first year he was under no external pressure whatsoever to match Senna, the yardstick for any driver, but to deliver decent results consistently and prove his winning ability from there on? It seems not. Perhaps he expected to, but that's a personal assertion the translation of which to others has to be functional rather than immaterial. The notion of a "bargain price" Hakkinen is, if possible, even more naïve. There's no shortage of talented people lining up to drive in Formula One, that's just a fact of Formula One life and not some ominous way to pressure someone in particular.
Sure, active suspensions, traction control, semi-automatic gearboxes and such do "weird things" if you're not used to those, indeed "stuff out of drivers' control" if he doesn't know what to expect and make use of. Exactly my point about so called "driver aids" and the purported ease with which F1 cars can be controlled with them, btw ... The frailty of that equipment must've also seemed nearly unfathomable to someone used to reliability and mechanical control of his vehicle. But sabotage, in a sport where even lesser mistakes can get someone killed, that'd carry some fairly hefty legal liabilities with it. Also, the loss of money associated with a nonperforming driver is a major concern to a struggling team; that McLaren held on to Michael for almost the whole season rather than draw conclusions sooner is indication enough that they gave him every opportunity they could afford.
The notion of Senna giving his setup to Andretti in Michael's final F1 race at Monza - as "proof" that Michael lacked support from his team - is a classic: Ayrton, while he could be ruthless in competition, had a rarely tuned empathy for those around him coupled with an acute sense of occasion. He must've seen that whatever Michael's preferences were, Andretti's setup hadn't and couldn't come close to what he himself routinely achieved. Of course this amounted to support, but it misses the larger point - Ayrton gave Michael an experience he could relate to and cherish, hoping that he'd have something positive to reflect on from his shortlived bid at Formula One stardom. A feeling of hope and understanding of a sport that, partly by chance, had dealt such a harsh hand for him to play with. Quite a present.
Marco reckons that "F1" would want to see him fail for entertainment purposes. Proof that not jadedness, nor pessimism, nor adopted negative preconceptions can make up for inexperience and doing one's own homework. In the whole sphere of F1, I have scarcely seen or heard a negative comment about the prospect of him emerging as a F1 driver. In fact, his test with Honda was met with such enthusiasm that the team had to play down its importance. Despite his surprising take on his father's trials, I'm no less welcoming of him. It'll take more than trashing McLaren to get on the good side of the likes of Ferrari, though. I hope Marco can yet balance his talent, respect for the experiences of his father and a realistic appraisal of what F1 demands of him as a driver.
AP, quoting Michael Andretti wrote:I'm not going to go into all of it. Let's just say it was not a pleasant experience. It was a time where I think I was sort of caught in a political battle of auto racing, and because of that wasn't a very good experience. If my dad went through that, I would obviously probably approach it a different way and tell that story. But it sounds like sour grapes coming from me.
He (Marco) is one of the bright young stars here in America, and open-wheel racing I think now is about ready to rocket (in popularity). I think there's something to that, for him to look at that, to think, 'Maybe I can help take IndyCar racing to the top.' I'm sure that's in the top of his mind.
I wonder if he's ever read
this?