If there weren't teams using the same engine on the grid i know what his excuse would be.
- Login or Register
No account yet? Sign up
A double points finish might be great news for any team, and it was too for McLaren when their cars crossed the finish line in 7th and 8th positions at the end of the Bahrain Grand Prix. The story of the team's weekend was however slightly more complicated.
If there weren't teams using the same engine on the grid i know what his excuse would be.
Come on guys, i remember someone being grilled for calling a Renault a Reno. So at least call it an F2 chassis. The last GP2 race was 2016.
The flip flop sponsorship better step up their technical consulting. This cannot and will not be tolerated.
Depends. Fuel efficiency is more important in race or in other words sustained power for the race.PlatinumZealot wrote:Ferrari's engine is just as powerful as Mercedes now so no more excuses!
Saw that on the live map too, Hulk was at the wrong part which meant Raikkonen had to move for the inside line in S2, I forgot which corner that was.
I don't really believe Ferrari did this on purpose, do you? I mean, why should they risk losing a car on front row? If Mercedes could have improved on their second runs, Kimi would have possibly dropped to P4.
Kimi had warned them about sending him out in traffic after his Q2 lap and after his final Q3 lap he said "we did exactly what i didnt want to happen. Exactly"LM10 wrote: ↑07 Apr 2018, 18:58I don't really believe Ferrari did this on purpose, do you? I mean, why should they risk losing a car on front row? If Mercedes could have improved on their second runs, Kimi would have possibly dropped to P4.
If they wanted to favor Vettel, they would do it in the race after starting both cars in front row instead of purposely losing important team points to Mercedes.
If Ferrari has same amount of power as Merc, then fuel consumption is pretty much the same. This formula is about fuel efficiency, since you are capped by 100kg of fuel, so that means more power you have, less fuel you burn actually.
Well, No.2 has to put up with these small inconveniences. How else will No.1 will look good.Silent Storm wrote: ↑07 Apr 2018, 19:04Kimi had warned them about sending him out in traffic after his Q2 lap and after his final Q3 lap he said "we did exactly what i didnt want to happen. Exactly"LM10 wrote: ↑07 Apr 2018, 18:58I don't really believe Ferrari did this on purpose, do you? I mean, why should they risk losing a car on front row? If Mercedes could have improved on their second runs, Kimi would have possibly dropped to P4.
If they wanted to favor Vettel, they would do it in the race after starting both cars in front row instead of purposely losing important team points to Mercedes.
It's becoming finns' specialty.GPR-A wrote: ↑07 Apr 2018, 19:18Well, No.2 has to put up with these small inconveniences. How else will No.1 will look good.Silent Storm wrote: ↑07 Apr 2018, 19:04Kimi had warned them about sending him out in traffic after his Q2 lap and after his final Q3 lap he said "we did exactly what i didnt want to happen. Exactly"LM10 wrote: ↑07 Apr 2018, 18:58
I don't really believe Ferrari did this on purpose, do you? I mean, why should they risk losing a car on front row? If Mercedes could have improved on their second runs, Kimi would have possibly dropped to P4.
If they wanted to favor Vettel, they would do it in the race after starting both cars in front row instead of purposely losing important team points to Mercedes.
Not Really. Depend of MGU H-K extraharvest. Please read honda pu thread.
