Interesting, quite close competition all across the field. This season starts to look like 2008 to me, not bad.
But we'll see...
Different engine, aero, backend, Everything is different. Your logic is so correct...iotar__ wrote: ↑07 Apr 2018, 19:53- They used de facto team orders in the first race of the season . It goes downhill after that.
Haven't watched but:
- Another chapter of creative excuses for Sixth Sense driver: unspecified (=made up) problems in Aus, power increase from heavens now .
- FIA should look closer into Toro Rosso = Red Bull partnership. Unfair and potentially illegal advantages like that are against the spirit of F1. Did you notice that headlines about FIA investigating Haas (they made sure to put "cheating" in them) were big and those with "clarification" either small or non-existent?
I don't know how it's team order to pit your leading driver? It's a thing every team does. This was the most possible way to do an undercut or put pressure on Mercedes. If they had pitted Vettel first, Mercedes would have told "Thank you" and just kept on driving and also looking after tyres. What's more, then again people would have told that Ferrari pitted Vettel first to put pressure or even overtake Kimi. VSC was a lucky thing and Vettel would have not even overtaken Kimi, if it didn't happen.
Thats an interesting point because it may be true, Ferrari is now more aero efficient?
haha, I cannot help but smile. Keep blaming engines Mclaren and Redbull.. Horner will ask for the "white smoke ban" from the Ferrari engines after the "party mode ban".Vasconia wrote: ↑07 Apr 2018, 20:55Thats an interesting point because it may be true, Ferrari is now more aero efficient?
for the record, Gene has said that China will be quite more difficult track for them so it will be interesting to see where is the ferrari really fast, I guess we need more races
Congratulations for Toro Rosso, that was a stunning performance, Mclaren must be shocked with this
What "if". You think they dontLM10 wrote: ↑07 Apr 2018, 18:58I don't really believe Ferrari did this on purpose, do you? I mean, why should they risk losing a car on front row? If Mercedes could have improved on their second runs, Kimi would have possibly dropped to P4.
If they wanted to favor Vettel, they would do it in the race after starting both cars in front row instead of purposely losing important team points to Mercedes.
I think they do. Just meant that if they had to choose between having both cars on front row or let one car qualify behind Mercedes, they would go with first option I assume.foxmulder_ms wrote: ↑07 Apr 2018, 21:09What "if". You think they dontLM10 wrote: ↑07 Apr 2018, 18:58I don't really believe Ferrari did this on purpose, do you? I mean, why should they risk losing a car on front row? If Mercedes could have improved on their second runs, Kimi would have possibly dropped to P4.
If they wanted to favor Vettel, they would do it in the race after starting both cars in front row instead of purposely losing important team points to Mercedes.
Agreed. Isn't venting the crank cases against what F1 stands for being all green and stuff?