Ok so basically they can get away with a simpler, low demand system for that then.Tommy Cookers wrote: ↑12 Apr 2018, 10:21because the horizontal stabiliser aka tailplane is not moved constantly ie at significant frequency
(I could say it's a jack but there's no law saying electromechanical actuation must be non-backdriveable)
in textbooks trimming eg via HS actuation is classified as secondary flight control
though Moog has tabulated it as primary flight control
trimming action is a slow and infrequent activity
unlike primary control
eg pitch control via the EH elevator servoactuator
There are other good answers above. I'd say in a turbocharged engine with very narrow rpm range (10,500 - 12,000 rpm) there is relatively little gain from variable intakes. But F1 is so competitive you have to turn every knob available to you, not just the high-gain knobs.johnny comelately wrote: ↑12 Apr 2018, 10:40Maybe a dumb question, but why are they using VLIM on (e-turbos)turbo engines?
Because I say crazy out there things so they feel the need to prove me wrong. I am wrong some times, as you showed with my mistaken assumption that rod length changed displacement. If I'm wrong I'm willing to accept it and move on, otherwise I will defend my craziness to the death.Mudflap wrote: ↑13 Apr 2018, 22:25I am not quite sure why electric vs hydraulic is still being debated.
All cars already carry a hydraulic pump so why not actuate everything hydraulically? An electrical actuator is several times heavier than a hydraulic actuator since it normally consists of a low power electric motor that drives a large reduction gearbox to generate any useful torque.
Because hydraulic lines full of hydraulic fluid running the length of the car would weigh more than electric cables.Mudflap wrote: ↑13 Apr 2018, 22:25I am not quite sure why electric vs hydraulic is still being debated.
All cars already carry a hydraulic pump so why not actuate everything hydraulically? An electrical actuator is several times heavier than a hydraulic actuator since it normally consists of a low power electric motor that drives a large reduction gearbox to generate any useful torque.
Is it more power though? This line makes it sound like it's not an increase in the power they currently have, just more use of the high power mode.bucker wrote: ↑13 Apr 2018, 18:47Renault says reliability looks good, so all three teams will have a little bit more power from now onwards. MGU-K upgrade planned with second round of power units.
Source: https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/rena ... e-1025524/
I hope it's more power, make a it a proper 3 way fight at the front, but that may have to wait until PU #2.The works Enstone outfit, Red Bull Racing and McLaren are henceforth all allowed to use higher power modes for longer than was the case in Australia and Bahrain.