https://www.sport.de/news/ne3175231/qua ... ro-update/
Updates in Monaco, Canada and Silverstone according to EB.
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
To bring updates in Monaco is madness, the chances of damages and DNFs is too high and would be pointless to update there.Thunder wrote: ↑03 May 2018, 12:35https://www.sport.de/news/ne3175231/qua ... ro-update/
Updates in Monaco, Canada and Silverstone according to EB.
Some things to consider:nzjrs wrote: ↑02 May 2018, 12:00I often wonder if the aerodynamicists learn something from situations like these. In Austria? I think Max took small floor damage and claimed the car was undrivable - but the McLaren takes off half its diffuser and Alonso finishes P7.iichel wrote: ↑01 May 2018, 13:08Damage on Alonsos diffuser, slightly different lighting than the pictures above
https://i.imgur.com/9juBysb.png
The effect could have been track specific, Baku is quite unique, but interesting nonetheless.
Maybe it's not an upgrade as such, maybe more of a Monaco package or aero configuration, specifically for said race.bauc wrote: ↑03 May 2018, 12:52To bring updates in Monaco is madness, the chances of damages and DNFs is too high and would be pointless to update there.Thunder wrote: ↑03 May 2018, 12:35https://www.sport.de/news/ne3175231/qua ... ro-update/
Updates in Monaco, Canada and Silverstone according to EB.
come on...We often see "Monaco Specific" packages. You literally throw every little piece of down-force at Monaco. Top speed means nothing there and neither does fuel efficiency.bauc wrote: ↑03 May 2018, 12:52To bring updates in Monaco is madness, the chances of damages and DNFs is too high and would be pointless to update there.Thunder wrote: ↑03 May 2018, 12:35https://www.sport.de/news/ne3175231/qua ... ro-update/
Updates in Monaco, Canada and Silverstone according to EB.
To take that point further, even if it is an aero update then it doesn't have to visible or can be a very subtle change on the outside that is almost undetectable.
It just shows how far Vandoorne is from Alonso in ability. He is not going to keep his seat next year if this continues.
Alonso shines specially when the car is not perfect. On a perfect car he’s just one of the (very) top drivers. When things aren’t perfect, setup is off the sweet spot or there’s a need to adapt to the unforeseen then he is unique, me thinks. He’s so fast reading car conditions and adapting his style to them.Hammerfist wrote: ↑04 May 2018, 06:43It just shows how far Vandoorne is from Alonso in ability. He is not going to keep his seat next year if this continues.
“That level of integration, we didn’t see that coming, neither Red Bull or us Renault. That was our common mistake, that we didn’t manage to support and identify and to react and correct. So we have been a little bit complacent with the model in which we wanted to collectively operate. That was not appropriate, that was not suitable or adapted to those new regulations.
I totally agree with you, key word, adapt. Be it to tyres, fuel saving, under/oversteer, he seems to be able to get the best out of a package. A good example is how quickly he adapted to indycar. I heard he set the fastest time at Spa yesterday as well. Hats of to the guy.dr_cooke wrote: ↑04 May 2018, 08:49Alonso shines specially when the car is not perfect. On a perfect car he’s just one of the (very) top drivers. When things aren’t perfect, setup is off the sweet spot or there’s a need to adapt to the unforeseen then he is unique, me thinks. He’s so fast reading car conditions and adapting his style to them.Hammerfist wrote: ↑04 May 2018, 06:43It just shows how far Vandoorne is from Alonso in ability. He is not going to keep his seat next year if this continues.