Track data? Which track data? When have any of these parts been put on track till today?RonDennis wrote: ↑11 May 2018, 03:27We're talking about a team that had the "best chassis" in 2017 and has a race winning engine now, while they haven't entered Q3 once and are fighting with teams like Haas, Force India and Toro Rosso.PhillipM wrote: ↑11 May 2018, 03:23Their pace hasn't been terrible though, it's been pretty damned good for an interim car with a rushed engine swap, race pace is top of the midfield.
I haven't heard anyone at the factories even mutter anything about correlation issues.
The nose was delayed because it failed crash tests, so they had to go through iterations + respective lead times. Which is why they only bolted an interim part of the new turning vanes on whilst they waited for it.
When did it fail the crash test?
http://www.marca.com/motor/formula1/gp- ... b45e8.htmlIn fact, this new update should have arrived at the third race of the year, in China, but it has been delayed because it had to be revised, since the track data did not correspond to what the wind tunnel predicted.
So you don´t have a clue, but throw some BS about bad correlation when the parts have not even been bolt into the car?
2 days of testing next week Plus testing for Perelli as well. Perelli testing can be useful this time around.Monster Hesh wrote: ↑10 May 2018, 21:57How many race weekends do we think before they are able to use this design optimally? This was meant to be on the car in Melbourne, so they are already 4 races behind. Maybe not until Austria before they can start extracting peak performance from it?
I didn't see any new parts in FP1. They did change the nose during the session, don't know why (both new spec).