sprint car76, if You try to express Your dislike towards Kubica, better try harder as neither of Your arguments is actually hitting the target. To answer Your questions though, Williams driver choice might have been somewhat biased by healthy paycheck from both of them, which I guess when spent on some major drafts like for example Paddy and Kubica, both very capable in their respective positions, where hoped to balance the drivers lack of experience, by giving them a decent car. Both SS and LS have not one, but two race engineers EACH, and all of them are pretty experienced. As Rob Smedley putted it: "now there's a good equilibrium in terms of level of seniority across the cars", which might even sound like a pun . Even though I am much more of a Kubica's fan than SS or LS, I amongst others actually noticed Lance's progress. He is maturing and good for him. That's probably why Sergey had to give up his FP1, not Lance, when feedback was needed most, as Barcelona is THE track, where all the updates are brought. Lance even admitted that he tries to get as much as he can from Kubica's presence to become a better driver. Lance can show some respect to Robert, so can You. But whether You like it or not, neither of our young drivers are going to top Kubica's experience and skill anytime soon. If the car had some unidentified issues up until now and is "embarrassing", might be partly drivers fault, for not giving precise enough feedback. When Kubica was hiried in a role his in now, both him and Paddy stated that his first job will be evaluating and enhancing simulator usefullness, which is somewhat in line with what Ringo posted and why they knew they're in deep sh.t.
But let's be optimistic they can sort it all out eventually, shall we? We have some testing ahead of us, let's hope that it will bring some answers