Only know that they kept changing nose on Alonso's car between old and new throughout the sessionadrianjordan wrote: β08 Jun 2018, 22:43Some talk over on the team page of an updated version of the new nose.
Is this correct? Any pics?
Old and new nose? They were trying out different front wings. I don't know where you saw the old nose.M840TR wrote: β08 Jun 2018, 22:53Only know that they kept changing nose on Alonso's car between old and new throughout the sessionadrianjordan wrote: β08 Jun 2018, 22:43Some talk over on the team page of an updated version of the new nose.
Is this correct? Any pics?
McLaren uniquely running the most complex RW endplates on the grid for a couple years (?) now. I wonder if this'll be maintained in the coming years or not.godlameroso wrote: β08 Jun 2018, 16:34The mid wing area doesn't change at all, just lower bargeboard leading edge. Neither does the diffuser, and the front wing won't change things too much. The biggest change comes from the draggier rear wing.mclaren111 wrote: β08 Jun 2018, 15:51godlameroso wrote: β08 Jun 2018, 15:25Still in the design phase possibly? It's really hard to develop that area, it's almost baked into the chassis. So changing that requires a B-spec chassis, it's a huge investment. The payoff would have to be guaranteed before going down that route.
Keep in mind the big changes for 2019. I would only persue now what can be used & fixed for 2019.
At the top is Rear Suspension
pretty sure the rules for 2019 will restrict them.roon wrote: β09 Jun 2018, 02:58McLaren uniquely running the most complex RW endplates on the grid for a couple years (?) now. I wonder if this'll be maintained in the coming years or not.godlameroso wrote: β08 Jun 2018, 16:34The mid wing area doesn't change at all, just lower bargeboard leading edge. Neither does the diffuser, and the front wing won't change things too much. The biggest change comes from the draggier rear wing.mclaren111 wrote: β08 Jun 2018, 15:51
Keep in mind the big changes for 2019. I would only persue now what can be used & fixed for 2019.
At the top is Rear Suspension
Can anyone here explain how McLaren's RW of justice works? I remember reading they reduce drag but it would be good if someone who understands Aero can explain.roon wrote: β09 Jun 2018, 02:58McLaren uniquely running the most complex RW endplates on the grid for a couple years (?) now. I wonder if this'll be maintained in the coming years or not.godlameroso wrote: β08 Jun 2018, 16:34The mid wing area doesn't change at all, just lower bargeboard leading edge. Neither does the diffuser, and the front wing won't change things too much. The biggest change comes from the draggier rear wing.mclaren111 wrote: β08 Jun 2018, 15:51
Keep in mind the big changes for 2019. I would only persue now what can be used & fixed for 2019.
At the top is Rear Suspension
That could be. Can't say for sure, however. Intuition says that they're doing the same thing to the lower edge of the endplate as they are with the top i.e. adding louvers to reduce the pressure differential either side of the endplate, reducing the intensity of the vortexes shed by the wing-endplate complex. Supposedly this reduces drag when compared to a solid endplate in the same general arrangement, or at least this how it is often spoken of.makecry wrote: β09 Jun 2018, 05:08Can anyone here explain how McLaren's RW of justice works? I remember reading they reduce drag but it would be good if someone who understands Aero can explain.roon wrote: β09 Jun 2018, 02:58McLaren uniquely running the most complex RW endplates on the grid for a couple years (?) now. I wonder if this'll be maintained in the coming years or not.godlameroso wrote: β08 Jun 2018, 16:34
The mid wing area doesn't change at all, just lower bargeboard leading edge. Neither does the diffuser, and the front wing won't change things too much. The biggest change comes from the draggier rear wing.
http://www.mulsannescorner.com/wingendplates.htmlroon wrote: β09 Jun 2018, 05:59That could be. Can't say for sure, however. Intuition says that they're doing the same thing to the lower edge of the endplate as they are with the top i.e. adding louvers to reduce the pressure differential either side of the endplate, reducing the intensity of the vortexes shed by the wing-endplate complex. Supposedly this reduces drag when compared to a solid endplate in the same general arrangement, or at least this how it is often spoken of.
Looking at the endplate head-on, it's easy to see they have endplate with a distinct lower edge (unique to them), which is louvered in a way similar to the treatment of the commonplace upper endplate louveres. (below)
I think the shape of the bargeboards is more or less dictated by everything in front of it and where they want the air to go. It looks like, with the rather low front wishbones, they want to maximise the air going under the sidepod opening and around the back over the DF. The air on top of the sidepod looks more or less stable so they only need small vanes to direct it where they want it.ringo wrote: β09 Jun 2018, 16:31https://imgr4.auto-motor-und-sport.de/F ... 168826.jpg
I think the biggest improvement mclaren can do to this car is to remove those bargeboards (the part under the "ard mille") and install baregboards with larger area in the vertical plane extending higher up the side of the tub. A redesign of the side pod opening would be done subsequent to that too.
This area is where the biggest deficit is to the other teams aero wise.
https://imgr3.auto-motor-und-sport.de/S ... 168825.jpg
from the front view, we see how nonexistent it is from the front view. This could be down to their philsophy. Could me more biased towards air entering the sidepods than it is about airflow around the sidepods.