thanksRevs84 wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 16:57It's the new spec.
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/gasl ... e-1045463/
thanksRevs84 wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 16:57It's the new spec.
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/gasl ... e-1045463/
Fishy yet smart move from honda. They dont have big update for next 7 races so put 2 engines instead, another loophole of regulation.Revs84 wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 17:00Here's another conspiracy theory for you. Red Bull were not sure of the gains from the new PU so they asked Honda to revert one of the engines back for quali
They may be thinking that as the car is out of position it is best to pass tail enders as soon as possible and be within 'striking distance' of the mid field by pit stop time. If they can make him a good gap to the last 4 cars by then he may eve get out of the pit just losing 1 or 2 places.
That is not true (even qualy 3:3) Gasley has qualified ahead of Hartley 4 times so the score is 4:2
Wazari said he misunderstood the allocation. Instead of two for the team there were two per car. Please don't forget to thank the insider.Bill wrote:So where are all those insiders who claimed Honda didn't have enough cos there handmade
thats the strategy i was thinking alsoI think its better go to Supersoft and then bring the hypersoft for a last stint fast with low fuel..
Australia is not a true represantative I think. But at the end yes H was better P after qual.tok-tokkie wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 18:22That is not true (even qualy 3:3) Gasley has qualified ahead of Hartley 4 times so the score is 4:2
Australia H=16 G=20
Bahrain G=5 H=11
China H=15 G=17
Uzbekistan G=17 H=20
Barcelona G=12 H=20
Monaco G=10 H=16
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/hart ... e-1045370/"The upgrade we have is a relatively small one in qualifying but where we really potentially made a step is for the race," said Hartley.