What he´s saying is RBR with his fuel has a handicap, they´re a bit behind (literally). That means the gap between RBR and Renault chassis is even higher, so even if they´re blaming RBR for using a different fuel, they´re also reckoning the gap with them is even higher than what we see.Godius wrote: ↑17 Jun 2018, 10:42Abiteboul clearly has gone delusional. The Exxon fueled RBR's lapped both Renault and McLaren with the BP fuel.lawnmower wrote: ↑16 Jun 2018, 12:07https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/rena ... e-1046183/
"I was secretly hoping that Red Bull would have the pace to win," said Abiteboul.
"They were very, very close to that, but not quite there. We have more to come, and they could have more to come from the fuel.
"That's something that's clear. We can guarantee an equity of performance of what is in our control, which is hardware, which is software.
"Not anything other than that, like fuel, because they elected themselves for strategic and commercial reasons to go for their own partner, which we appreciate, and we support by homologating their product.
"I'm sure Exxon has to ability and capacity to catch up, but they are a bit behind. The installation is also a little bit different.
"That's why there are small discrepancies, and I accept that."
Or yours? In McLaren's post race report, which is uploaded couple hours after the race, it said ''...after losing boost pressure thanks to a broken charge air cooler pipe.''.Mudflap wrote: ↑17 Jun 2018, 20:33http://gptoday.com/full_story/view/6419 ... Abiteboul/
So it wasn't the exhaust manifold then, just another Eric Boulanger cockup.
It was meant as a reply to godlameroso's post on the previous page if could have been arsed to read..Benii6 wrote: ↑17 Jun 2018, 21:00Or yours? In McLaren's post race report, which is uploaded couple hours after the race, it said ''...after losing boost pressure thanks to a broken charge air cooler pipe.''.Mudflap wrote: ↑17 Jun 2018, 20:33http://gptoday.com/full_story/view/6419 ... Abiteboul/
So it wasn't the exhaust manifold then, just another Eric Boulanger cockup.
Renault likely do not supply the intercooler nor associated pipework.Benii6 wrote: ↑17 Jun 2018, 21:00Or yours? In McLaren's post race report, which is uploaded couple hours after the race, it said ''...after losing boost pressure thanks to a broken charge air cooler pipe.''.Mudflap wrote: ↑17 Jun 2018, 20:33http://gptoday.com/full_story/view/6419 ... Abiteboul/
So it wasn't the exhaust manifold then, just another Eric Boulanger cockup.
Yes, I agree. I was just trying to point out that EB didn't say that the issue was cracked manifold. And I realize this isn't the place to discuss this, but it's a pet peeve of mine, when people mispresent facts and then call for someone's job based on those facts.roon wrote: ↑17 Jun 2018, 21:26Renault likely do not supply the intercooler nor associated pipework.Benii6 wrote: ↑17 Jun 2018, 21:00Or yours? In McLaren's post race report, which is uploaded couple hours after the race, it said ''...after losing boost pressure thanks to a broken charge air cooler pipe.''.Mudflap wrote: ↑17 Jun 2018, 20:33http://gptoday.com/full_story/view/6419 ... Abiteboul/
So it wasn't the exhaust manifold then, just another Eric Boulanger cockup.
Andres125sx wrote: ↑17 Jun 2018, 19:14What he´s saying is RBR with his fuel has a handicap, they´re a bit behind (literally). That means the gap between RBR and Renault chassis is even higher, so even if they´re blaming RBR for using a different fuel, they´re also reckoning the gap with them is even higher than what we see.Godius wrote: ↑17 Jun 2018, 10:42Abiteboul clearly has gone delusional. The Exxon fueled RBR's lapped both Renault and McLaren with the BP fuel.lawnmower wrote: ↑16 Jun 2018, 12:07https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/rena ... e-1046183/
"I was secretly hoping that Red Bull would have the pace to win," said Abiteboul.
"They were very, very close to that, but not quite there. We have more to come, and they could have more to come from the fuel.
"That's something that's clear. We can guarantee an equity of performance of what is in our control, which is hardware, which is software.
"Not anything other than that, like fuel, because they elected themselves for strategic and commercial reasons to go for their own partner, which we appreciate, and we support by homologating their product.
"I'm sure Exxon has to ability and capacity to catch up, but they are a bit behind. The installation is also a little bit different.
"That's why there are small discrepancies, and I accept that."
I don´t think they would say this if it´s not true
I understand what he says and I'm not trolling. What bothers me is that Abiteboul is always blaming third-parties for the Renault shortcomings. He never takes into account that Red Bull has been a very loyal customer, the most loyal in the last decade. I believe only Force India (with Mercedes) comes close to them in terms of customer loyalty. Even their own Enstone team turned their back against Renault a few years ago. and still Abiteboul grabs every opportunity to drag Red Bull trough the mud. I'm sure the Exxon guys are introducing a new fuel spec that enhances performance in the upcoming races, no need for him to whine about it, he should focus on his own team.
Loyal? They were trying everything they could to get out of the partnership during 2014/15. Even trying to get Bernie to wield some influence to force a Mercedes supply which fell flat on it's face and in the fallout they no longer run badged Renault's. They love doing the same thing you accuse Abiteboul of.Godius wrote: ↑18 Jun 2018, 10:33Andres125sx wrote: ↑17 Jun 2018, 19:14What he´s saying is RBR with his fuel has a handicap, they´re a bit behind (literally). That means the gap between RBR and Renault chassis is even higher, so even if they´re blaming RBR for using a different fuel, they´re also reckoning the gap with them is even higher than what we see.
I don´t think they would say this if it´s not trueI understand what he says and I'm not trolling. What bothers me is that Abiteboul is always blaming third-parties for the Renault shortcomings. He never takes into account that Red Bull has been a very loyal customer, the most loyal in the last decade. I believe only Force India (with Mercedes) comes close to them in terms of customer loyalty. Even their own Enstone team turned their back against Renault a few years ago. and still Abiteboul grabs every opportunity to drag Red Bull trough the mud. I'm sure the Exxon guys are introducing a new fuel spec that enhances performance in the upcoming races, no need for him to whine about it, he should focus on his own team.
Wow, can't believe I got down voted on this!djos wrote: ↑18 Jun 2018, 11:06So funny, Renault have finally realised they haven't got a chance of winning any races at all in the next few years if RedBull leave for Honda and they are pulling out all stops to keep them.
Personally I really hope Honda can pull a rabbit out of their hat and produce a quality PU in time for RedBull to use them for 2019.
Sorry about that. I'm not Eric thoughMudflap wrote: ↑17 Jun 2018, 20:33http://gptoday.com/full_story/view/6419 ... Abiteboul/
So it wasn't the exhaust manifold then, just another Eric Boulanger cockup.