I think McLaren will be better of with Renault.
Honda is still not there.. a lost year for RedBull Racing
Still nowhere with Renault and deprived of 100s of millions. They're properly screwed.Starscreamer wrote: ↑19 Jun 2018, 09:30I think McLaren will be better of with Renault.
Honda is still not there.. a lost year for RedBull Racing
Well I guess that makes me special!Cannonballer wrote: ↑19 Jun 2018, 06:25It is pretty safe to say that you are the only person to doubt the additional exposure Alonso gets for his team(s) is worth the cost of his salary. It is even safer to say that you are the only person who thinks Alonso did not have a reasonable chance of winning the Indy 500 before the engine blew up. And it is definitely safe to say that you are the only person who takes issue with Alonso thinking that he is a superior driver to Alexander Rossi.
Mule? Nonsense. They started out with the intention of rekindling the glory-days partnership but it became quickly apparent that Honda had to build an engine for McLaren instead of building a chassis/power-unit combination together. Honda aren't the disaster they were made out to be, McLaren aren't pulling up trees with their "best chassis of the field, let down by the engine" now they've changed engine.
McLaren a winner? Care to elaborate on exactly how they contributed? Oh they let Alonso drive, as if they own him? So now you're saying McLaren mooched a win from Toyota then. Not long ago McLaren fans here had a Japanese culture bashing fest and now you have the audacity to say Toyota are winners thanks to McLaren and Alonso? The race was given to them and the pole setter was Nakajima Kazuki, not Alonso, if you didn't know.Ground Effect wrote: ↑18 Jun 2018, 18:51
First of all, you can't be sure of anything Fernando thinks, unless he comes out and says it, or you read minds now? Secondly, I doubt Toyota are regretting giving him the drive, with all the positive publicity they've gotten, plus the praise Fernando got on his night stint. He obviously proved he didn't just make up the numbers. Toyota are a big company, with a corporate image, and success with Fernando didn't hurt at all. He also brought a lot more awareness and publicity to this year's event, that people would have passed off as a two horse race. So, the winners in all this were the FIA, WEC, the Le Mans organizers, Toyota, Mclaren and Fernando. I doubt any of the above woke up on Monday morning feeling guilty or sorry for themselves.
Finally, a good lesson in life is not to underestimate yourself and what you can achieve, why should Fernando feel he can't win Indy, even at the first attempt?
You don't seem to understand what I'm talking about Toyota winning in all this. They got more publicity, which companies thrive on, if it was so inconsequential, why did WEC/FIA adjust the schedule for Fuji on guess who's request (Toyota). Fernando had already stated that he would miss the event due to a clash with an F1 race. But Toyota made the request for the change, because it would benefit them PR-wise to have him there, not because they can't win without him. It was their call, their decision, because it was seen as beneficial to them. Nobody doubts it's a team event, everybody played a part, including Fernando.ispano6 wrote: ↑19 Jun 2018, 11:24McLaren a winner? Care to elaborate on exactly how they contributed? Oh they let Alonso drive, as if they own him? So now you're saying McLaren mooched a win from Toyota then. Not long ago McLaren fans here had a Japanese culture bashing fest and now you have the audacity to say Toyota are winners thanks to McLaren and Alonso? The race was given to them and the pole setter was Nakajima Kazuki, not Alonso, if you didn't know.Ground Effect wrote: ↑18 Jun 2018, 18:51
First of all, you can't be sure of anything Fernando thinks, unless he comes out and says it, or you read minds now? Secondly, I doubt Toyota are regretting giving him the drive, with all the positive publicity they've gotten, plus the praise Fernando got on his night stint. He obviously proved he didn't just make up the numbers. Toyota are a big company, with a corporate image, and success with Fernando didn't hurt at all. He also brought a lot more awareness and publicity to this year's event, that people would have passed off as a two horse race. So, the winners in all this were the FIA, WEC, the Le Mans organizers, Toyota, Mclaren and Fernando. I doubt any of the above woke up on Monday morning feeling guilty or sorry for themselves.
Finally, a good lesson in life is not to underestimate yourself and what you can achieve, why should Fernando feel he can't win Indy, even at the first attempt?
Finally, a good lesson in life is not take credit for something you didn't do, makes you lose all credibility. Another good lesson is to some people the only important letters in "Team" are "M" and "E". Choose your team wisely.
Yes, and just wait to see the disaster if Alonso leaves the team.Mr. Fahrenheit wrote: ↑19 Jun 2018, 11:11Mule? Nonsense. They started out with the intention of rekindling the glory-days partnership but it became quickly apparent that Honda had to build an engine for McLaren instead of building a chassis/power-unit combination together. Honda aren't the disaster they were made out to be, McLaren aren't pulling up trees with their "best chassis of the field, let down by the engine" now they've changed engine.
We've already seen the benefit of the engine supplier and manufacturer making concessions through Toro Rosso's performances.
Honda aren't blameless and I'm sure they've learnt many things, not just technically but also organisationally especially bridging cultural gaps in development approaches. We'll see whether that's sufficient to satisfy RB.
McLaren are Williams-ing fast.
Oh gosh what a shambles. So McLaren ditched the "GP2 engine" that was slowing down the "third best chassis on the grid" to go to an "engine they can fight with"... Only for redbull a team with the proven best chassis, to dump that same engine and pick up the "crap engine" to win championships with in yhe future. Yeah. McLaren really screwed up there. Must suck.. This surely highlights the shortsightedness of the leadership.
The 2nd paragraph says 'Whitmarsh stepped down as McLaren team boss in 2014, after 25 years with the Woking outfit'sn809 wrote: ↑19 Jun 2018, 12:31This news about Whitmarsh being called back by staff would be funny but in reality is just sad. He was made to leave as he was not performing although Dennis had a lot to do with it so there could be potential for a comeback.
Boullier and Mr Soso to Renault and that will be the first step back to the front.
https://www.f1today.net/en/news/f1/2392 ... ren-crisis
You must be trolling. They were the only drivers working for that team then?ispano6 wrote: ↑19 Jun 2018, 13:02Alonso can't get close to Vettel, Hamilton, or Schumacher in championships so he's gone the complete driver route, only that he chooses to get into teams that already did the hard work. At what point did he help develop Andrettis Honda? At what point did he help develop Toyotas LMP1 car? Zero. zilch. None. That was the hard painstaking work of Sato and Kobayashi.
McLaren hasn't said it was a win for them so why are you saying it is?
Your counting some chickens who's shells aren't cracked yet but yeah.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑19 Jun 2018, 12:57Oh gosh what a shambles. So McLaren ditched the "GP2 engine" that was slowing down the "third best chassis on the grid" to go to an "engine they can fight with"... Only for redbull a team with the proven best chassis, to dump that same engine and pick up the "crap engine" to win championships with in yhe future. Yeah. McLaren really screwed up there. Must suck.. This surely highlights the shortsightedness of the leadership.