I hope at the end of the day he won't end up writing his own book: "How NOT to Build a Race car"
I hope at the end of the day he won't end up writing his own book: "How NOT to Build a Race car"
The call it the start of a new concept.
Nothing new, just really laying into them and basically saying that they're not able to identify problems that other teams have solved etc etc etc....also that noone outside of Mclaren thought their chassis last year was any good, it was very draggy and that they blamed Honda for everything etc etc etc... Sounded a lot like some members on here actually...GoranF1 wrote: ↑29 Jun 2018, 13:19What did he said?adrianjordan wrote: ↑29 Jun 2018, 13:12Anyone else hear Andrew (Benson?) on BBC 5Live coverage of first practice? He really has it in for McLaren..!!
He’s a massive hypocrite. He praised the McLaren chassis multiple times last year.adrianjordan wrote: ↑29 Jun 2018, 22:18
also that noone outside of Mclaren thought their chassis last year was any good, it was very draggy and that they blamed Honda for everything etc etc etc...
By contrast, tight and twisty Singapore is a race where the high quality of McLaren's chassis can come to the fore and the team are expecting a decent points score.
or maybe it worked fine, nothing definitive without someone to compare to with last years engine.Dipesh1995 wrote: ↑29 Jun 2018, 22:50He’s a massive hypocrite. He praised the McLaren chassis multiple times last year.adrianjordan wrote: ↑29 Jun 2018, 22:18
also that noone outside of Mclaren thought their chassis last year was any good, it was very draggy and that they blamed Honda for everything etc etc etc...
One example of his words :By contrast, tight and twisty Singapore is a race where the high quality of McLaren's chassis can come to the fore and the team are expecting a decent points score.
No, he is snakes. Typical media person604gtir wrote: ↑30 Jun 2018, 00:15or maybe it worked fine, nothing definitive without someone to compare to with last years engine.Dipesh1995 wrote: ↑29 Jun 2018, 22:50He’s a massive hypocrite. He praised the McLaren chassis multiple times last year.adrianjordan wrote: ↑29 Jun 2018, 22:18
also that noone outside of Mclaren thought their chassis last year was any good, it was very draggy and that they blamed Honda for everything etc etc etc...
One example of his words :By contrast, tight and twisty Singapore is a race where the high quality of McLaren's chassis can come to the fore and the team are expecting a decent points score.
this year is this year, last year is last year.
and this year something isnt right
Benson is an absolute pellet.adrianjordan wrote: ↑29 Jun 2018, 22:18Nothing new, just really laying into them and basically saying that they're not able to identify problems that other teams have solved etc etc etc....also that noone outside of Mclaren thought their chassis last year was any good, it was very draggy and that they blamed Honda for everything etc etc etc... Sounded a lot like some members on here actually...GoranF1 wrote: ↑29 Jun 2018, 13:19What did he said?adrianjordan wrote: ↑29 Jun 2018, 13:12Anyone else hear Andrew (Benson?) on BBC 5Live coverage of first practice? He really has it in for McLaren..!!
Andrew, are you listening??
Yup this guy is nuts and clueless on the technical side and possibly even worse than Ted on sky. He kept using the speed trap figures to highlight the hp diff. His graphs are legendary though, one wonders about his qualifications. Poor guy, they really need some one with him to help on the technical side.Dipesh1995 wrote: ↑29 Jun 2018, 22:50He’s a massive hypocrite. He praised the McLaren chassis multiple times last year.adrianjordan wrote: ↑29 Jun 2018, 22:18
also that noone outside of Mclaren thought their chassis last year was any good, it was very draggy and that they blamed Honda for everything etc etc etc...
One example of his words :By contrast, tight and twisty Singapore is a race where the high quality of McLaren's chassis can come to the fore and the team are expecting a decent points score.
What does MCL32 have to do with MCL33? Different chassis built around two fundamentally different PUs.techman wrote: ↑30 Jun 2018, 08:19i had a debate with Andrew Benson last year. A twitter war of words. if you want i can post it here. i was arguing with him saying that mclaren are running heavy drag and not all honda faults. and he was so convinced mclaren had a chassis as good as the redbull according to his source(Mclaren PR people). Funny enough he did finally say that I was right when he tweeted me back this year when i again tweeted him and questioned him.
same aero concept carried over to this year. i dont see any aero personal change. so yes this car is an evolution of last year. but last year car was bad and this year this car is exposed for its flaws it was hiding last year.Mclaren even managed to bring a b spec but still the problems are there. finally Andrew Benson has changed his opinionWhat does MCL32 have to do with MCL33? Different chassis built around two fundamentally different PUs.
Oh boy, please keep this thoughts to yourself.