Every team besides Ferrari had blistering maybe we actually see the different tyres at some more GP.
Every team besides Ferrari had blistering maybe we actually see the different tyres at some more GP.
You don’t think it made things more interesting? Maybe it wouldn’t be a bad thing if cars had to stop twice a race instead of a 100% secure, bolted on one stop race after race.
Max handled it quite well as far as I could tell.
Ha! So you'd rather mention Lewis than blame the team for today's failure? Sorry, but that's either seriously upside down or straight out biased.popovic94 wrote: ↑01 Jul 2018, 17:07Yeah it affected both cars today FIRST time after 1955 Italian GP. This was just bad luck and tough track that caused both fails. I agree it was strategy mistake that they havent pited but I am more surprised by Hamilton's behavior after the team's fault. You are at 4 place 11 laps younger tires than people around you in arguably fastest car on a track with 3 DRS zones and you go on and on on a radio instead to race and speak after race. That was not we win and lose together etc.I chear for Mercedes and for Hamilton but this was again whole world is against me moment... If he was at Alonsos place he would crash that car direct in pitwall.GrandAxe wrote: ↑01 Jul 2018, 16:53My point is only buttressed by the fact that it seems to have affected not just one, but both cars. So, you have strategy and engineering fails thoroughly trashing a race that was theirs for the taking, losing valuable constructor and driver points.
The last time it was folk getting dimensions of the engine wrong, today it was a shocking strategy failure and an equally shocking double DNF.
Something has become old and tired at Merc. After today, Ferrari now leads both constructor and drivers championships.
Well we always say its up to the other teams to catch up to the Mercedes PU, so its up to the other teams to get on top of the tyre blistering
It's the benefit everyone gets controlling the race from up front.
It definitely spiced up the race with tyres not lasting for 60 laps (unless you're in a Ferrari or really nursing them home) as it should be. I hope we see more races like this and that Silverstone is the last race with the special tyres.
+100Chene_Mostert wrote: ↑01 Jul 2018, 17:20
Well we always say its up to the other teams to catch up to the Mercedes PU, so its up to the other teams to get on top of the tyre blistering![]()
Dummies that have to nurse their fuel. No SC meant they HAD to nurse.Fulcrum wrote: ↑01 Jul 2018, 17:22If Ferrari were actively instructing Raikkonen and Vettel to run to deltas once Ricciardo and Hamilton were out of the way, which is what I'm hearing, then I bet they're both a bit p'd off right now. Why would Ferrari do this? Let one driver try full beans immediately and, if he destroys the tyres, you have another in reserve. For goodness sake, this is strategy for Dummies.
Has this been mentioned in the reporting or is this your hypothesis?TAG wrote: ↑01 Jul 2018, 17:30Dummies that have to nurse their fuel. No SC meant they HAD to nurse.Fulcrum wrote: ↑01 Jul 2018, 17:22If Ferrari were actively instructing Raikkonen and Vettel to run to deltas once Ricciardo and Hamilton were out of the way, which is what I'm hearing, then I bet they're both a bit p'd off right now. Why would Ferrari do this? Let one driver try full beans immediately and, if he destroys the tyres, you have another in reserve. For goodness sake, this is strategy for Dummies.
Whats biased I just told you that I cheer for team and for him in championship!?GrandAxe wrote: ↑01 Jul 2018, 17:20Ha! So you'd rather mention Lewis than blame the team for today's failure? Sorry, but that's either seriously upside down or straight out biased.popovic94 wrote: ↑01 Jul 2018, 17:07Yeah it affected both cars today FIRST time after 1955 Italian GP. This was just bad luck and tough track that caused both fails. I agree it was strategy mistake that they havent pited but I am more surprised by Hamilton's behavior after the team's fault. You are at 4 place 11 laps younger tires than people around you in arguably fastest car on a track with 3 DRS zones and you go on and on on a radio instead to race and speak after race. That was not we win and lose together etc.I chear for Mercedes and for Hamilton but this was again whole world is against me moment... If he was at Alonsos place he would crash that car direct in pitwall.GrandAxe wrote: ↑01 Jul 2018, 16:53
My point is only buttressed by the fact that it seems to have affected not just one, but both cars. So, you have strategy and engineering fails thoroughly trashing a race that was theirs for the taking, losing valuable constructor and driver points.
The last time it was folk getting dimensions of the engine wrong, today it was a shocking strategy failure and an equally shocking double DNF.
Something has become old and tired at Merc. After today, Ferrari now leads both constructor and drivers championships.
That Merc introduced a new engine and straight away suffered a double DNF is statistically beyond bad luck.
That the team has made more strategy errors than others is also statistically beyond bad luck.
The team has to look itself in the mirror, shine lights into its dark nooks and crannies to remove any hints of the lackadaisical practices that tend creep in when an organisation gets used to seeing monumental success come their way.
Definitely. The cars were designed and built with a specification of tyre in mind so to make in-season changes without the agreement of all teams would be disgraceful.Chene_Mostert wrote: ↑01 Jul 2018, 17:20Well we always say its up to the other teams to catch up to the Mercedes PU, so its up to the other teams to get on top of the tyre blistering![]()