2018 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
User avatar
Vanja #66
1571
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: 2018 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Zynerji wrote:
08 Jul 2018, 18:28
PS: we still need to see how a points gap between Hamilton and Vettel plays out, as I can see the red team bringing engine 3 a race or two early, knowing that they will take an engine penalty later by introducing a 4th spec unit. If you can soak up a 10 place penalty in Japan or so to avoid a mechanical DNF, it may be the best strategy I think.
Where do you come up with this stuff?
And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

User avatar
Zynerji
110
Joined: 27 Jan 2016, 16:14

Re: 2018 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:
10 Jul 2018, 17:33
Zynerji wrote:
08 Jul 2018, 18:28
PS: we still need to see how a points gap between Hamilton and Vettel plays out, as I can see the red team bringing engine 3 a race or two early, knowing that they will take an engine penalty later by introducing a 4th spec unit. If you can soak up a 10 place penalty in Japan or so to avoid a mechanical DNF, it may be the best strategy I think.
Where do you come up with this stuff?
20 years of long term planning experience?

The worst case scenario for Vettel would be a mechanical DNF, close to the end of the year, in such a tight championship battle. Hamilton showed that making up 10 places in this year's field isn't very hard. So a strategic penalty on an easy- to- overtake circuit to ensure a fresh engine that can be ran hard at the last events would make a lot of sense.

Hamilton nursing a 5,6,7 race spec 3 Merc against a turned up race 1,2,3 spec 4 Ferrari would be a covetous advantage in my eyes.

User avatar
Vanja #66
1571
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: 2018 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

That's all well and good and perfectly logical. Just that you are presenting it as a fact and a necessity, when both teams are clearly on top of the situation (for now) and they are going towards avoiding penalty. :) However, it's possible they might just push each other towards using a lot more often high-power modes in races, which will result in a need for another component set to avoid mech DNF.
And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

User avatar
Zynerji
110
Joined: 27 Jan 2016, 16:14

Re: 2018 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

In my post, I use the phrase "I can see the red team..." I thought that would be enough to show it was an opinion, not fact.

Who knows? They both might have a similar idea, and it will balance out.

It would be epic to see if done as a surprise, as they would have to put it in for FP3, and announce, then see if the other tries to change before Qualifying by skipping FP3...

Crazy things happen in close seasons, and it's been a long time since 2 different teams were this close, so who knows?

User avatar
Vanja #66
1571
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: 2018 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Depends on how Red Bull does in the final third of the season, if they keep improving, it might be too risky to pull this off.
And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

Brenton
Brenton
1
Joined: 17 Dec 2017, 07:28

Re: 2018 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

If average points is 18 per race without factoring random events like non-mechanical DNFs or collisions,
And starting with a grid penalty will cost an average of 7 points in result,
Taking a 4th PU would have to reduce the PU DNF risk from over 30% to 0% to be worth it,
and that's without factoring things like increased risk of collision due to starting further back.
I doubt that reducing the PU mileage by 30% (?) is going to increase the usable PU performance level much at all.
Taking an unnecessary penalty not only costs Vettel points in that race but could gain Hamilton as much as 7 more points.

The costs are likely much worse than the benefits of deliberately taking a penalty to use 4 PU.

User avatar
Zynerji
110
Joined: 27 Jan 2016, 16:14

Re: 2018 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:
11 Jul 2018, 00:22
Depends on how Red Bull does in the final third of the season, if they keep improving, it might be too risky to pull this off.
Completely agree! That was my concern when I mentioned the points spread making the decision.

User avatar
Zynerji
110
Joined: 27 Jan 2016, 16:14

Re: 2018 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Brenton wrote:
11 Jul 2018, 02:19
If average points is 18 per race without factoring random events like non-mechanical DNFs or collisions,
And starting with a grid penalty will cost an average of 7 points in result,
Taking a 4th PU would have to reduce the PU DNF risk from over 30% to 0% to be worth it,
and that's without factoring things like increased risk of collision due to starting further back.
I doubt that reducing the PU mileage by 30% (?) is going to increase the usable PU performance level much at all.
Taking an unnecessary penalty not only costs Vettel points in that race but could gain Hamilton as much as 7 more points.

The costs are likely much worse than the benefits of deliberately taking a penalty to use 4 PU.
I would weigh running a fresh, upgraded PU/trans against a long used engine. I wouldn't do it with another spec 3 unit.

However, the chance to take 21 points over second place in the last 3 races with a big power advantage is very tasty, and may well be worth the risk!

f1316
f1316
82
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 18:36

Re: 2018 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Another point to factor would be the statistical likelihood of a safety car at the race in question - because that can completely negate the penalty of starting at the back depending on the timing.

However, that likelihood is also usually higher on a track that’s easier to overtake, so it’s a tough one.

That said, if for whatever reason you’re forced to start at the back anyway (e.g. Hamilton in Brazil last year) it’s a slam dunk to take a new one and then it could turn into a positive for subsequent races.

MakkieT
MakkieT
0
Joined: 07 Feb 2015, 21:47

Re: 2018 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Who's dominating the headlines!!
Image
:D

User avatar
adrianjordan
24
Joined: 28 Feb 2010, 11:34
Location: West Yorkshire, England

Re: 2018 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

What's the story about Marchionne being ill? They mentioned it on 5Live text coverage, but it was the first I've heard about it. What's he ill with?
Favourite driver: Lando Norris
Favourite team: McLaren

Turned down the chance to meet Vettel at Silverstone in 2007. He was a test driver at the time and I didn't think it was worth queuing!! 🤦🏻‍♂️

User avatar
adrianjordan
24
Joined: 28 Feb 2010, 11:34
Location: West Yorkshire, England

Re: 2018 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Favourite driver: Lando Norris
Favourite team: McLaren

Turned down the chance to meet Vettel at Silverstone in 2007. He was a test driver at the time and I didn't think it was worth queuing!! 🤦🏻‍♂️

Ringleheim
Ringleheim
9
Joined: 22 Feb 2018, 10:02

Re: 2018 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

I still can't figure out if Marchionne is genuinely in serious condition, perhaps on the brink of dying, or if this simply means he lost the power struggle and is out a year or so earlier than planned.

I don't think his shoulder surgery or complications resulting therefrom are the true cause for the change in power right now.

Curious to see how John Elkann does as chairman and Camilleri as CEO at Ferrari.

saviour stivala
saviour stivala
52
Joined: 25 Apr 2018, 12:54

Re: 2018 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

adrianjordan wrote:
21 Jul 2018, 16:26
What's the story about Marchionne being ill? They mentioned it on 5Live text coverage, but it was the first I've heard about it. What's he ill with?
What ever it is he is ill with, it has been decided that he would not be able to return to his job, so a replacement has been appointed.

saviour stivala
saviour stivala
52
Joined: 25 Apr 2018, 12:54

Re: 2018 Scuderia Ferrari F1 Team

Post

Ringleheim wrote:
22 Jul 2018, 05:57
I still can't figure out if Marchionne is genuinely in serious condition, perhaps on the brink of dying, or if this simply means he lost the power struggle and is out a year or so earlier than planned.

I don't think his shoulder surgery or complications resulting therefrom are the true cause for the change in power right now.

Curious to see how John Elkann does as chairman and Camilleri as CEO at Ferrari.
i am not saying it is the case with Marchionne, but i have a friend that a cancer bigger than a pizza has been removed from his shoulder.