Shoot Mosley

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
bernard
bernard
0
Joined: 06 Jun 2004, 21:10
Location: France/Finland

Shoot Mosley

Post

Ok. I just can't find the words anymore. Basically I'm pissed off. Really pissed off.
Max mosley. I hate him.:x
He is so not the right person to be in carge of f1. He is so clearly in favour of ferrari, eventhough he denies it. And that's --- up. I've taken all his tricks so far, and you guys have said that he is not in favour of ferrari.
His latest trick might very well put a final nail in the coffin of next season.
Mosley's new rule changes and whether they do, as Ron Dennis said, favour ferrari, is a f*cked up thing in itself, but now the FIA(read Mosley) asked ferrari to conduct secret tests during the testban to test the next years rulechanges in effect! :!: As if ferrari wasn't dominant enough, do we really need to make the rulechanges in co-operation with them? They say this didn't quite work, lets try that, and Mosley listens. And what do you know, we start next season with one team a giant leap ahead of the others, because that team was making the rules. Sadly that team is ferrari, who the Mosley's rulechanges seem already to be made for, and who are already too dominant. :roll:
So Mosley, you f*ckhead, stop making things easier for ferrari, even if they are your favourite team.
And the other people in charge of Formula1, Ecclestone, for example, wake up and realise that mosley is ruining the sport, your investment. Kick him out. Nobody needs him.
Why didn't he resign like he promised? :x :x :x

User avatar
sharkie17
0
Joined: 16 Apr 2004, 03:38
Location: Texas

Post

calm down frenchmen...

better get all your sources in row before throwing some crazy story like that around.

Monstrobolaxa
Monstrobolaxa
1
Joined: 28 Dec 2002, 23:36
Location: Covilhã, Portugal (and sometimes in Évora)

Post

sharkie17 wrote:calm down frenchmen...

better get all your sources in row before throwing some crazy story like that around.
Aproved! :lol:

bernard
bernard
0
Joined: 06 Jun 2004, 21:10
Location: France/Finland

Post


Reca
Reca
93
Joined: 21 Dec 2003, 18:22
Location: Monza, Italy

Post

I was at the secret test, this qualify me as a spy ? If so then the same is true for another 2-3000 spectators and also for several members of all the other F1 teams. No, wait... I even took some pics... and I also “questioned” a Ferrari engineer... I’m not just a spy, I’m James Bond.

User avatar
sharkie17
0
Joined: 16 Apr 2004, 03:38
Location: Texas

Post

Bernard, i saw that when it came out...

but what do you consider Mosley/Ferrari connection?
The test seems pretty innocuous, its not even a test to make the car go fast, but rather slower... and also to see the effect of slipstreaming (which would allow/encourage passing) all of the things which will be GOOD for F1, not just Ferrari...

I tell you what, Bernard... whenever the other F1 teams start to bitch about this secret test, i will protest right along with you.


p.s. would you still be bitching if FIA had asked Williams to conduct this test? or Renault?

bernard
bernard
0
Joined: 06 Jun 2004, 21:10
Location: France/Finland

Post

Reca wrote:I was at the secret test, this qualify me as a spy ? If so then the same is true for another 2-3000 spectators and also for several members of all the other F1 teams. No, wait... I even took some pics... and I also ?questioned? a Ferrari engineer... I?m not just a spy, I?m James Bond.
Sorry. I thought it was a secret test since there were no news about it and nobody paid it any attention.

And sharkie, if williams was the only team that was locked so tightly with the FIA to make the rules about the design of the car for the next year, I sure as hell would be pissed off. But in ferrari's case the situation is even worse, because Ferrari is already so dominant, giving them a headstart into next year is a suicide for F1. And ferrari already has a suspiciously close relationship with Mosley. I guess it's just a "coincedence" that Mosley asked ferrari to test his rulechanges. And that too that FIA has been in
contact with ferrari the most in making up the rulechanges.
Quess I'm just a big conspiracy theorist. One with a bit of a temperament.

Oh, and I'm not completely alone with my opinions, one Ron Dennis does spring to mind. But in his case too people have played down his accusations of favouring ferrari. "Thats just not possible. The FIA is a democratic organisation." ...With a ferrari favouring boss. :lol:

bernard
bernard
0
Joined: 06 Jun 2004, 21:10
Location: France/Finland

Post

Here is what Ron Dennis thinks of the rules, and FIA's response.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/motorsp ... 609826.stm
(and don't bother telling me youve already read that, it's just to give an example that other people, that are rather high and rather deep in F1 think so too.)

hudsonhawk
hudsonhawk
0

Post

Bernard,

Its a lost cause. Let them do what they want. When the money dries up cause fan have left the sport, they might realise.

You can have an effect. Join the MOTOGP revolution. Make the switch, its racing without the greed. Leave these money hungry bums to drown in their dollars. EJECT EJECT EJECT.

Don't calm down Bernie - FIRE UP. =D>

Sharkie12 will be the only one left on this site posting to himself. :lol:

Catchya on the highway.

Monstrobolaxa
Monstrobolaxa
1
Joined: 28 Dec 2002, 23:36
Location: Covilhã, Portugal (and sometimes in Évora)

Post

Humm...it's a lost cause bernard!You're saying all that but but it seems to me that you do not pay attention to F1....in 1994/5 who developed the crash-tests for the FIA?????? Mclaren! In 1999 who tested a new diffuser for FIA????? Minardi did!!! So don't come with the story about Mosley prefering Ferrari cause other teams have participated in the past in FIA testing sessions.

Another thing is that Mosley doesn't choose who gets to test the parts....there is a FIA technical panel who analysis these things and they are the ones that choose.

If it was all like you said don't you think every single team would be angree about it??? Only Ron has said anything about it....and he is one of the guys that didn't even want to sign the Concorde agreement!!!(back in 1996/7)

So calm down cause if the conspiracy theory real existed probably all the teams would be talking about it and not only Mclaren. Untill the end of the year probably the other big teams will also have a test.

Monstrobolaxa
Monstrobolaxa
1
Joined: 28 Dec 2002, 23:36
Location: Covilhã, Portugal (and sometimes in Évora)

Post

Just remembered...who did the inicial development work on the grooved tires in 1997?????? Beneton did! So thing are moved around....or do you think in those years everyone made a big fuss because one team got an advantage.

I know what you're thinking that the are favoring the team that has won the last 4 World Championships....but probably not....it was Ferraris turn to do the inicial work. I the previous years no body complained because the tests weren't preformed by the winning team....they were preformed by a front/mid-field team. Now it was pure coincidence.

User avatar
sharkie17
0
Joined: 16 Apr 2004, 03:38
Location: Texas

Post

Thank you Monstro, for clearing that up :)

and Hudsonchicken, go back to your MotoGP corner... as usual, your post had nothing to add. :roll:

bernard
bernard
0
Joined: 06 Jun 2004, 21:10
Location: France/Finland

Post

Ok. I'll put a lid on my conspiracy theories for now. :lol: But just as soon as I get some more info backing my theories I'll be sure to make some noise again.
Just because there is no real evidence baking the Mosley/ferrari marriage doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I'll keep my eyes open! :D

User avatar
sharkie17
0
Joined: 16 Apr 2004, 03:38
Location: Texas

Post

bernard wrote:Ok. I'll put a lid on my conspiracy theories for now. :lol: But just as soon as I get some more info backing my theories I'll be sure to make some noise again.
Just because there is no real evidence baking the Mosley/ferrari marriage doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I'll keep my eyes open! :D
lol... you crack me up...

but hey, somebody's gotta keep a tab on things, right?

hudsonsquawkie
hudsonsquawkie
0

Post

There never will be any evidence to back these consipracy theories causes its too political. There is too much money involved.

Vote with your feet, as have so many fan already.

:lol: Your the funniest poster suckie2 :lol:

suckie suckie two dolla suckie suckie