Agreed! What I didn't like was that they didn't ask ALO opinion.Andres125sx wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 09:00It was not a matter of opinions or data. McLaren, similar to Red Bull with Verstappen, made a bet. They did bet rain would come, no matter what the weather reports were.
They failed miserably, but they had nothing to loose with one car dead last and the other outside the points, so shouldn´t provide any added drama...
I see no reason for Alonso so stay in McLaren right now. I wouln´t expect too much from those updates, if they exist, because other ones haven´t solved Mclaren´s problems. I hope I am wrong and Alonso can stay.
Around the 2 min mark of https://youtu.be/aw--BkZn7YYmwillems wrote: ↑22 Jul 2018, 14:11Do you have a link to them saying it was solely aero and no other issues?diffuser wrote: ↑21 Jul 2018, 22:12Yes they did say it was soley aero.mwillems wrote: ↑21 Jul 2018, 18:17
Did Mclaren say it is solely aero? They said they have a correlation issue. Ivan then said it wasnt exactly correlation. This makes me think the way the car is maintaining contact with the ground isnt what they expect.
Canada for instance, they ran a particularly hard suspension.... i do.wonder if the suspension causes the car to move too much and causes the floor to stop working. This is something they might find hard to test in a wind tunnel.
Correlation issue is why they didn't see it in the wind tunnel.
I saw them saying correlation issues, not whether the correlation issue was solely the tunnel or issues with car behaviour. The fact that Ivan R has since stated that the issues "arent exactly correlation" clearly shows there is much more we dont understand about the issues. Happy to be wrong, but i have my doubts.
All i hear is a yet to be identified aero issue, which is also a statement from a journo. I guess the truth will out at somepoint.diffuser wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 14:29Around the 2 min mark of https://youtu.be/aw--BkZn7YYmwillems wrote: ↑22 Jul 2018, 14:11Do you have a link to them saying it was solely aero and no other issues?
I saw them saying correlation issues, not whether the correlation issue was solely the tunnel or issues with car behaviour. The fact that Ivan R has since stated that the issues "arent exactly correlation" clearly shows there is much more we dont understand about the issues. Happy to be wrong, but i have my doubts.
Well according to the guy from McLaren they've made some good progress on finding out what went wrong. Zak Brown said in Germany that the car has several problems, which probably means it's fundamentally flawed. So I would expect that they're fully switching to 2019 quite soon, because you can't polish a turd.mwillems wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 14:38All i hear is a yet to be identified aero issue, which is also a statement from a journo. I guess the truth will out at somepoint.diffuser wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 14:29Around the 2 min mark of https://youtu.be/aw--BkZn7YYmwillems wrote: ↑22 Jul 2018, 14:11
Do you have a link to them saying it was solely aero and no other issues?
I saw them saying correlation issues, not whether the correlation issue was solely the tunnel or issues with car behaviour. The fact that Ivan R has since stated that the issues "arent exactly correlation" clearly shows there is much more we dont understand about the issues. Happy to be wrong, but i have my doubts.
Working on the 2021 car, I'm glad you ain't running a racing team.McG wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 13:43I don't think McLaren can improve much if any this year. Their next chance will be 2021 where hopefully the new rules will shake everything up and McLaren concentrate on the 2021 car very early. Also hopefully by that time Renault have a better engine or McLaren change to a better engine by a new manufacturer.
It is not looking good for the next few years.
I didn't see any new bargeboard & midwing parts in Germany. Development starts at the front, always. That's why they were testing FW and brake ducts mostly. Maybe a new floor too.
No and you aren't either so step down from your high horse.RonDennis wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 20:15Well according to the guy from McLaren they've made some good progress on finding out what went wrong. Zak Brown said in Germany that the car has several problems, which probably means it's fundamentally flawed. So I would expect that they're fully switching to 2019 quite soon, because you can't polish a turd.
Working on the 2021 car, I'm glad you ain't running a racing team.McG wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 13:43I don't think McLaren can improve much if any this year. Their next chance will be 2021 where hopefully the new rules will shake everything up and McLaren concentrate on the 2021 car very early. Also hopefully by that time Renault have a better engine or McLaren change to a better engine by a new manufacturer.
It is not looking good for the next few years.
He was 2 laps down.
Mate, the 2021 regs aren't even final yet.McG wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 21:03No and you aren't either so step down from your high horse.RonDennis wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 20:15Well according to the guy from McLaren they've made some good progress on finding out what went wrong. Zak Brown said in Germany that the car has several problems, which probably means it's fundamentally flawed. So I would expect that they're fully switching to 2019 quite soon, because you can't polish a turd.
Working on the 2021 car, I'm glad you ain't running a racing team.McG wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 13:43I don't think McLaren can improve much if any this year. Their next chance will be 2021 where hopefully the new rules will shake everything up and McLaren concentrate on the 2021 car very early. Also hopefully by that time Renault have a better engine or McLaren change to a better engine by a new manufacturer.
It is not looking good for the next few years.
He was 2 laps down.
Mercedes put a lot of very early work into their 2014 car, Honda into the 2009 car. So enough of your crap.
By the end of 2019 when McLaren are still nowhere it will become a realistic option to increase focus on 2021.
One thing you don't understand for sure is that teams do think that far ahead no matter what situation they are in.
There's always the crystal ball...M840TR wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 21:22Mate, the 2021 regs aren't even final yet.McG wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 21:03No and you aren't either so step down from your high horse.RonDennis wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 20:15
Well according to the guy from McLaren they've made some good progress on finding out what went wrong. Zak Brown said in Germany that the car has several problems, which probably means it's fundamentally flawed. So I would expect that they're fully switching to 2019 quite soon, because you can't polish a turd.
Working on the 2021 car, I'm glad you ain't running a racing team.
He was 2 laps down.
Mercedes put a lot of very early work into their 2014 car, Honda into the 2009 car. So enough of your crap.
By the end of 2019 when McLaren are still nowhere it will become a realistic option to increase focus on 2021.
One thing you don't understand for sure is that teams do think that far ahead no matter what situation they are in.